Tundra Space

Tundra Space

Clinical Research Directory

Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.

Back to Studies
COMPLETED
NCT07702747
NA

The Association Between the Stress Hormone Cortisol and Decision-making

Sponsor: Marie-France Marin

View on ClinicalTrials.gov

Summary

The goal of this study is to learn how acute psychosocial stress influences decision-making in healthy young adults. It will also examine whether cortisol reactivity, a biological stress response, changes the influence of physiological emotional signals on decision-making (i.e., the gut feeling indicating risks). The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Does exposure to an acute psychosocial stressor affect the development of physiological emotional signals during decision-making? 2. Does cortisol reactivity moderate the relationship between physiological emotional signals and decision-making? 3. Are there sex differences in these relationships? Researchers will compare participants exposed to a standardized psychosocial stress procedure, with participants exposed to a non-stressful control condition. Participants will: 1. Be randomly assigned to either a psychosocial stress condition or a control condition. 2. Complete a gambling decision-making task following the experimental manipulation. 3. Provide multiple saliva samples and subjective stress ratings throughout the session to assess stress reactivity. 4. Undergo continuous electrodermal activity recording during the decision-making task to measure physiological emotional signals.

Official title: Stress-induced Cortisol Clouds the Gut Feeling in Decision-making: A Randomized Controlled Study

Key Details

Gender

All

Age Range

18 Years - 35 Years

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Enrollment

116

Start Date

2021-09-13

Completion Date

2024-11-07

Last Updated

2026-07-14

Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Interventions

OTHER

Trier Social Stress Test

Participants completed a slightly modified version of the Trier Social Stress Task (TSST), a validated psychosocial stress induction protocol. The protocol involved a 10-minute anticipation period followed by a 10-minute test phase: a 5-minute mock job interview and a 5-minute surprise mental arithmetic task. During the test phase, participants stood in front of a one-way mirror ("Panel-out" version) and were told they were being observed by behavioral analysts and recorded via camera, although no recording took place and the analysts were lab confederates.

Locations (1)

Centre de recherche de l'Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Montréal

Montreal, Quebec, Canada