Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
Conventional, High-Intensity Laser, and Magnetic Field Therapies in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Sponsor: KTO Karatay University
Summary
This retrospective study aims to compare the clinical effectiveness of conventional physical therapy, high-intensity laser therapy (HILT), and pulsed magnetic field therapy (PMFT) in individuals with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). The study evaluates changes in pain, symptom severity, functional status, hand grip strength, and electrophysiological findings following treatment. Researchers will compare the outcomes of the three treatment approaches to determine whether HILT or PMFT provides additional clinical benefits beyond conventional therapy. The findings may help clinicians select the most appropriate conservative treatment strategy for patients with CTS.
Official title: Comparative Effectiveness of Conventional, High-Intensity Laser, and Magnetic Field Therapies in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Retrospective Study
Key Details
Gender
All
Age Range
18 Years - 65 Years
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
48
Start Date
2020-01-20
Completion Date
2025-10-20
Last Updated
2026-07-16
Healthy Volunteers
No
Conditions
Interventions
Conventional Physical Therapy
A standardized conservative treatment program including therapeutic ultrasound, TENS, nerve and tendon gliding exercises, and neutral wrist splinting.
High-Intensity Laser Therapy (HILT)
High-intensity laser therapy was applied according to the standard treatment protocol as an adjunct to conventional physical therapy.
Pulsed Magnetic Field Therapy (PMFT)
Pulsed magnetic field therapy was applied according to the standard treatment protocol as an adjunct to conventional physical therapy.
Locations (1)
Kto Karatay University
Konya, Karatay, Turkey (Türkiye)