Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
Effectiveness of Joint Distraction Versus Passive End Range Overpressure in Osteoarthritis:
Sponsor: University of Faisalabad
Summary
Knee osteoarthritis was a common degenerative joint condition that caused pain, stiffness, reduced range of motion, and functional limitations. This study compared two manual therapy techniques: Joint Distraction and Passive Joint End-Range Overpressure. The goal was to determine which technique was more effective at reducing pain, improving knee range of motion, enhancing function, and improving quality of life in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either Joint Distraction or Passive Joint End-Range Overpressure for 4 weeks.
Official title: Comparative Effectiveness of Joint Distraction Versus Passive End Range Overpressure in Managing Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Key Details
Gender
All
Age Range
40 Years - 59 Years
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment
26
Start Date
2025-12-25
Completion Date
2026-05-25
Last Updated
2026-07-17
Healthy Volunteers
No
Interventions
Joint distraction GROUP A
The joint distraction is the manual approach in knee osteoarthritis. This is very efficient in managing pain, to increase range of motion and reduce stiffness of joint due to osteoarthritis. A specialized greave would be created to distract the knee joint. Using a platform beneath the lower leg to create counterpressure, the knee would be put in flexion while sustained traction will be performed for 20 minutes while the patient would be in a supine posture. In each session, the traction would be adjusted to the patients' perceived threshold. The least amount of work that caused patients to get distracted would be employed as a diversion
Passive Joint End-Range Overpressure TO GROUP B
The passive joint end-range overpressure is the technique of Maitland grade IV which is performed passively. End-range Individual Maitland mobilizations were carried out at the tibiofemoral joint. Depending on the patient's level of pain and tolerance, an oscillatory accessory approach using Grade III or IV was carried out. Patients positioned their knees in their true end range while lying supine on the plinth. The most limited or reproducible knee pain was caused by the accessory approach that was employed. By moving the therapist's body without making any additional movements, the physical contact accurately replicated the hand position of the mobilization. For three minutes, Maitland mobilization was carried out twice at a rate of one oscillation every one or two seconds, with a 30-second break in between
Locations (1)
The university of Faisalabad
Faisalābad, Punjab Province, Pakistan