Tundra Space

Tundra Space

Clinical Research Directory

Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.

Back to Studies
NOT YET RECRUITING
NCT07732985

Comparative Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy and Case Difficulty Assessment of Three Large Language Models

Sponsor: Cairo University

View on ClinicalTrials.gov

Summary

This prospective, blinded diagnostic accuracy study aims to compare the performance of three large language models-ChatGPT (GPT-5.5 Pro), Gemini 3.1 Pro, and Claude Opus 4.7-in endodontic diagnosis and case difficulty assessment. The models will be evaluated against expert consensus as the reference standard using standardized clinical data and periapical radiographs. Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and agreement with expert consensus will be assessed to determine the potential of LLMs as clinical decision-support tools in endodontics.

Official title: Comparative Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy and Case Difficulty Assessment of Three Large Language Models in Endodontics Using Expert Consensus as the Reference Standard

Key Details

Gender

All

Age Range

16 Years - Any

Study Type

OBSERVATIONAL

Enrollment

342

Start Date

2026-09-01

Completion Date

2027-01

Last Updated

2026-07-29

Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Interventions

DEVICE

ChatGPT (GPT-5.5 Pro), Gemini 3.1 Pro, Claude Opus 4.7

Large language model used to analyze standardized clinical information and periapical radiographs to provide pulpal and periapical diagnosis and endodontic case difficulty assessment according to AAE criteria