Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
Remote Intervention Versus Routine Monitoring in COPD Patients With Chronic Hypercapnia Receiving Home Non-invasive Respiratory Support
Sponsor: Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital
Summary
This study is a randomized controlled trial designed to compare the effectiveness of active remote intervention versus passive monitoring alone in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure who are receiving home non-invasive respiratory support. The primary goal is to evaluate the impact on health-related quality of life and the frequency of acute exacerbations over a 12-month period.
Official title: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Remote Intervention Versus Routine Monitoring in COPD Patients With Chronic Hypercapnia Receiving Home Non-invasive Respiratory Support
Key Details
Gender
All
Age Range
40 Years - 80 Years
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment
236
Start Date
2027-08-01
Completion Date
2028-12-31
Last Updated
2026-08-06
Healthy Volunteers
No
Interventions
Remote Management
Participants will receive home non-invasive respiratory support combined with active remote management. This includes regular analysis of ventilation data, assessment of oxygenation status, risk prediction, and remote parameter adjustment by a respiratory therapist.
Remote Monitoring Only
Participants will receive home non-invasive respiratory support with remote monitoring only. No active intervention will be performed by the study team based on the data. Patients will continue with standard care from their primary physician.
Locations (4)
Henan Provincial People's Hospital
Zhengzhou, Henan, China
The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
Changsha, Hunan, China
Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
Taizhou Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine
Wenling, Zhejiang, China