Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
Digital vs Conventional VFR in Post-Orthodontic Retention
Sponsor: Ziauddin University
Summary
This study is comparing two ways of making a retainer, the clear, removable kind worn after braces to see whether the way it's made affects gum health. One type is made using a digital scan of the teeth, and the other is made the traditional way, using a plaster mold. The study will look at how each type affects plaque buildup, gum swelling, and the depth of the space between the tooth and gum over a six-month period. About 52 people who have just finished braces on both their upper and lower teeth will take part. Participants will be assigned to one of two groups: one group will receive a digitally made retainer, and the other will receive a traditionally made retainer. Retainer Fitting Before the study begins, each participant's retainer is custom-made for their teeth, either from a digital scan or a plaster mold, depending on which group they're in. Participants will wear their retainer for 22 hours a day, taking it out only to eat and brush their teeth. Daily Care Throughout the study, participants will follow the same tooth-brushing and gum-care routine, so that any differences seen between the two groups can be linked to the retainer itself rather than to differences in oral hygiene. Participants will be asked to avoid using mouthwash while wearing the retainer. Check-Up Visits Participants will attend four check-ups over six months: Before the retainer is placed (baseline) One month after placement Three months after placement Six months after placement At each visit, a dentist will check the teeth and gums for plaque buildup, gum swelling or bleeding, and pocket depth (the space between the tooth and gum) using a small measuring tool called a probe. Follow-Up The final check-up at six months marks the end of the study for each participant. Participants can leave the study at any time if they choose.
Official title: Comparison of Periodontal Health Parameters Using Conventional Versus Digital Vacuum Formed Retainer (VFR).
Key Details
Gender
All
Age Range
15 Years - 30 Years
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment
52
Start Date
2026-09
Completion Date
2027-12
Last Updated
2026-08-12
Healthy Volunteers
No
Interventions
Digital Vacuum-Formed Retainer
PETG, 1.5 mm, fabricated via intraoral scan and 3D-printed model
Conventional Vacuum-Formed Retainer
PETG, 1.5 mm, fabricated via alginate impression and plaster model