Tundra Space

Tundra Space

Clinical Research Directory

Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.

Back to Studies
NOT YET RECRUITING
NCT07779733
NA

BurstDR Spinal Cord Stimulation Versus Sham in Established Responders

Sponsor: Umeå University

View on ClinicalTrials.gov

Summary

This study aims to determine whether ongoing BurstDR spinal cord stimulation (SCS) provides pain relief beyond sham stimulation in patients with chronic pain who are established responders to BurstDR therapy. Participants already implanted with an SCS system and experiencing stable clinical benefit from BurstDR will undergo both active stimulation and sham stimulation in a randomized, double-blind crossover design. Each participant will therefore serve as their own control. The primary question is whether pain intensity is lower during active BurstDR stimulation compared with sham stimulation. The study will also evaluate treatment satisfaction, patient-reported changes in sleep, mood, daily activity and social activity, the effectiveness of blinding, and short-term safety and tolerability.

Official title: Passive Recharge Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation vs Sham Stimulation in Established Responders: A Randomized, Double-Blind Crossover Clinical Trial

Key Details

Gender

All

Age Range

Any - Any

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Enrollment

28

Start Date

2026-09-30

Completion Date

2027-03-31

Last Updated

2026-08-21

Healthy Volunteers

No

Conditions

Interventions

DEVICE

BurstDR Spinal Cord Stimulation

Active BurstDR spinal cord stimulation is delivered for 7 consecutive days using each participant's established clinically effective stimulation settings. Electrode configuration, pulse pattern, pulse width, frequency structure, and amplitude are maintained according to the participant's established therapeutic program, with any adjustment required to maintain imperceptible stimulation completed before the randomized treatment periods.

DEVICE

Sham Spinal Cord Stimulation

During sham stimulation, the implanted spinal cord stimulation system remains in place but stimulation output is switched off for 7 consecutive days. The participant-facing programmer is locked and visible device information that could reveal treatment allocation is masked. Study contacts, diary assessments, and follow-up procedures are otherwise equivalent to those during active stimulation.

Locations (1)

University Hospital of Northern Sweden

Umeå, Sweden