Tundra Space

Tundra Space

Clinical Research Directory

Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.

Back to Studies
NOT YET RECRUITING
NCT07795541
NA

OPTImizing Lead Placement in Patients Requiring Pacemaker After Cardiac Surgery

Sponsor: Sahlgrenska University Hospital

View on ClinicalTrials.gov

Summary

Conventional right ventricular pacing has been associated with ventricular dyssynchrony and an increased risk of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy, which may lead to worse clinical outcomes. To lessen the burden of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy, the adoption of conduction system pacing has increased in recent years. In patients with normal cardiac function, measured as left ventricular ejection fraction, the superiority of conduction system pacing is less clear. As a result, both pacing strategies remain in widespread clinical use. Patients undergoing cardiac surgery represent a vulnerable cohort for pacing-induced cardiomyopathy, given their established structural heart disease, and postoperative atrioventricular block remains a common occurrence in these patients. This multicenter randomized trial aims to evaluate the use of conduction system pacing, in the form of left bundle branch area pacing, versus conventional pacing in patients with normal left ventricular ejection fraction after cardiac surgery.

Official title: OPTIMIZING LEAD PLACEMENT IN PATIENTS REQUIRING PACEMAKER AFTER CARDIAC SURGERY

Key Details

Gender

All

Age Range

18 Years - Any

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Enrollment

110

Start Date

2026-09-10

Completion Date

2030-12

Last Updated

2026-08-31

Healthy Volunteers

No

Interventions

DEVICE

Left bundle branch area pacing

Conventional pacing strategy versus conduction system pacing strategy in the form of left bundle branch area pacing

DEVICE

Conventional pacing strategy

Conventional pacing strategy