Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
Comparison Between Xenograft and Extended PRF as Jumping Gap Grafting Material Versus Natural Healing of the Socket Without Any Material.
Sponsor: Mansoura University
Summary
This study aims to clinically and digitally evaluate immediate implants placed in mandibular molar extraction sockets and compare the outcomes of xenograft, e-PRF, and no grafting material within the jumping gap.
Official title: Clinical and Digital Evaluation of Different Jumping Gap Grafting Materials Versus No Grafting Material in Immediate Lower Molar Implant Placement
Key Details
Gender
All
Age Range
18 Years - 60 Years
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment
30
Start Date
2025-02-02
Completion Date
2026-08-25
Last Updated
2026-09-08
Healthy Volunteers
No
Conditions
Interventions
Xenograft jumping gap filling material
after tooth extraction and implant placement, xenograft particulates were placed to fill the jumping gap before sealing the socket with a chairside socket sealing abutment.
e-PRF jumping gap filling material
after tooth extraction and implant placement, e-PRF was prepared from the patient's collected blood and placed to fill the jumping gap before sealing the socket with a chairside socket sealing abutment.
Locations (1)
Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University
Al Mansurah, Egypt