Tundra Space

Tundra Space

Clinical Research Directory

Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.

Back to Studies
ACTIVE NOT RECRUITING
NCT07814573
NA

Comparison of Early-stage Outcomes of Spontaneous Drainage Versus Negative-pressure Drainage Monitoring in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Study

Sponsor: Başakşehir Çam & Sakura City Hospital

View on ClinicalTrials.gov

Summary

Cardiovascular surgery clinics currently employ drainage monitoring methods involving both negative pressure and non-negative pressure systems. Literature reviews indicate that while drainage monitoring using negative pressure has been evaluated in thoracic surgery studies, it has not been assessed in the context of cardiovascular surgery patients. This study was designed to determine the risk-benefit profile of negative pressure drainage monitoring in patients undergoing open-heart surgery and to ascertain whether negative pressure influences the incidence or volume of postoperative tamponade or pericardial effusion.

Key Details

Gender

All

Age Range

18 Years - 80 Years

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Enrollment

400

Start Date

2026-09-01

Completion Date

2027-09-15

Last Updated

2026-09-11

Healthy Volunteers

No

Interventions

PROCEDURE

monitoring of drainage using negative pressure

During the routine postoperative monitoring of drainage, negative pressure (approximately -10 mmHg) will be applied for 48 hours to the drainage sites of patients in the study group via a tube connected to the hospital's negative pressure system. Apart from this, all groups will undergo routine monitoring for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft patients, and there will be no other differences in procedures, medications, or treatments between the groups. Negative-pressure drainage monitoring is already in use at the clinics.

Locations (1)

Başakşehir Çam Ve Sakura Şehir Hastanesi

Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)