Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
Endoscopic-Assisted Versus Conventional Crestal Sinus Lift
Sponsor: Nahla Mahmoud Awad
Summary
To compare Endoscopic-Assisted Versus Conventional Crestal Sinus Lift; bone grafting will be performed, followed by implant placement. Membrane perforation rates, surgical time, and bone density changes will be evaluated.
Official title: Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Endoscopic-Assisted Versus Conventional Crestal Sinus Lift: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Key Details
Gender
All
Age Range
21 Years - Any
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment
24
Start Date
2026-05-25
Completion Date
2028-07-31
Last Updated
2026-09-17
Healthy Volunteers
No
Conditions
Interventions
Endoscopic-guided Sinus lift
12 patients in Group 2 (Endoscopic-guided): Endoscopic evaluation was conducted after each drilling step, osteotome malleting, and bone graft placement to monitor sinus membrane integrity.
non- endoscopic sinus lift
12 patients in Group 1(non-endoscopic-guided): Endoscopic evaluation was performed after complete osteotomy preparation and sinus membrane elevation using osteotomes.
Locations (1)
Cairo University
Cairo, Cairo Governorate, Egypt