Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
Comparison Between Two Different Loops for Maxillary Canine Retraction
Sponsor: Fayrouz Esam
Summary
The aim of the study is to evaluate and compare the clinical efficiency of two distinct loop mechanics for maxillary canine retraction, by comparing the rate of orthodontic tooth movement achieved, while assessing other dental parameters.
Official title: Comparison Between Two Different Loops for Maxillary Canine Retraction (Split Mouth Technique)(Randomized Clinical Study)
Key Details
Gender
All
Age Range
16 Years - 25 Years
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment
20
Start Date
2026-09-01
Completion Date
2029-12-01
Last Updated
2026-09-17
Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Conditions
Interventions
Poul Gjessing (PG) spring
orthodontic patient treated by Poul Gjessing (PG) spring for canine retraction.
Modified Marcotte spring
orthodontic patient treated by Modified Marcotte spring for canine retraction.