Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
Comparing Bone Healing in Jaw Fractures Fixed With Herbert Screws Versus 3D Miniplates
Sponsor: Cairo University
Summary
the goal of this clinical trial is to compare two methods of fixing fractures in the front part of the jaw (mandible): second-generation Herbert screws and 3-dimensional miniplates. Importance: Choosing the right fixation method is crucial for proper bone healing after a jaw fracture. Participants: Patients with recent anterior mandibular fractures requiring surgery. Key Findings: The study assessed which method better maintained bone density around the fracture, indicating potential benefits for healing. Implications: Understanding the effectiveness of these methods aids healthcare providers in making informed decisions, ultimately improving patient outcomes.
Official title: "Comparative Assessment of Interfragmentary Bone Density in Anterior Mandibular Fracture Fixation Using Second Generation Herbert Screws Versus 3-Dimensional Miniplates: A Randomized Clinical Trial"
Key Details
Gender
All
Age Range
18 Years - Any
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment
22
Start Date
2026-09-01
Completion Date
2027-04
Last Updated
2026-09-17
Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Conditions
Interventions
headless compression screw
•The second-generation Herbert screw has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative, offering compression across fracture lines and requiring less surgical exposure.
3D mini plates
•Conventional fixation using 3D miniplates has been widely accepted for managing anterior mandibular fractures because of their ability to provide stable three-dimensional support