Tundra Space

Tundra Space

Clinical Research Directory

Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.

Back to Studies
COMPLETED
NCT07856524
NA

Sutureless Versus Conventional Suturing in Oral Surgery

Sponsor: Jouf University

View on ClinicalTrials.gov

Summary

This randomized clinical study compares sutureless wound closure using n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive with conventional silk suturing following minor oral surgical procedures. The study evaluates wound healing as the primary outcome, along with postoperative pain, time to hemostasis, closure time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative complications. Eighty patients were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to either sutureless closure or conventional suturing and were followed for 14 days after surgery.

Official title: Sutureless Versus Conventional Suturing in Oral Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Study on Healing and Postoperative Outcomes

Key Details

Gender

All

Age Range

18 Years - 45 Years

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Enrollment

80

Start Date

2026-02-01

Completion Date

2026-05-31

Last Updated

2026-10-02

Healthy Volunteers

No

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Sutureless Wound Closure Using n-Butyl-2-Cyanoacrylate

The study protocol describes the intervention as n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive (Histoacryl) used for sutureless wound closure.

PROCEDURE

Conventional Suturing

The study uses interrupted 3-0 black braided silk sutures, which are removed on postoperative day 7.

Locations (1)

King Abdulaziz Specialist Hospital

Sakakah, Al Jawf Region, Saudi Arabia