Clinical Research Directory

Fluid Balance Guided by Modified Venous Excess Ultrasonography Versus Standard Care in Patients With Acute Kidney Injury Receiving Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy

The goal of this randomised controlled trial is to compare the cumulative fluid balance over the first 72 h following inclusion guided by mVExUS versus standard of care in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury receiving CRKT . It will also compare the proportion of CRRT-related complications-including intradialytic hypotension and arrhythmias-between patients managed with mVExUS-guided fluid management and those receiving standard care. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does fluid removal rate guided by mVExUS will reduce cumulative fluid balance over the course of the first 72 h of CRRT in ICU patients compared to standard care Participants will: Get fluid assessment by mVExUS protocol or a strandard care every 8 hours for 72 hours

Peripheral Tissue Perfusion in Intensive Care

Tissue perfusion has been identified as an early prognosis factor in patients admitted to intensive care. However, little is known about the effects of different hemodynamic interventions performed in clinical routine on peripheral tissue perfusion. The aim of this work is to study the kinetics of CRT and local skin blood flow following therapeutic intervention (fluid challenge, vasopressor or inotropic drug).

Concordance Study of Therapeutic Decision-making in Patients With Shock Based on Hemodynamic Monitoring

Shock is a serious complication corresponding to acute circulatory failure resulting in multiorgan failure and death. In order to improve cellular oxygen utilization, several therapies can be used. To select one of them, the monitoring of cardiac output is helpful. However, there are several methods used in current practice in intensive care for evaluating hemodynamic. Currently, in patients with acute circulatory failure, no study has compared the concordance of therapeutic decision-making based on transpulmonary thermodilution or transthoracic echocardiography. The objective of the PICC-ECHO study is thus to assess the concordance of therapeutic decision-making by several experts, based on data from transpulmonary thermodilution or transthoracic echocardiography. Indeed, the investigators hypothesize that performing hemodynamic monitoring based on transpulmonary thermodilution or transthoracic echocardiography does not lead to the same therapeutic management in patients in shock.