Clinical Research Directory

64Cu-GRIP B in Patients With Acute Myocarditis

The proposed patient study represents the first-ever acute myocarditis patient imaging study with 64Cu-GRIP B PET. The tracer is designed to detect extracellular granzyme B as it is secreted by activated cytotoxic T lymphocytes in the cardiomyocyte inflammatory microenvironment, highlighting areas of CD8 T cell activity leading to cardiomyocyte damage. Myocarditis is characterized pathologically by myocardial infiltration of T cells and macrophages with presence of cardiomyocyte death - the proposed tracer tests for both the accumulation of CD8 T cells and their cytotoxic activity, which will hopefully significantly improve diagnostic certainty. The study population is focused on patients with acute myocarditis to assess the specificity and sensitivity of 64Cu-GRIP B to detect myocarditis. In future studies, 64Cu-GRIP B PET may also serve as a biomarker to monitor early response to immunomodulatory therapies to treat acute myocarditis. Each year at UCSF, the investigators encounter about 20 patients with acute myocarditis. These patients often present with non-specific cardiac symptoms with some evidence of cardiac injury (abnormal electrocardiogram or elevation in cardiac biomarkers such as troponin). Rarely is the diagnosis clear and often numerous additional clinical studies are necessary to rule out other common causes of cardiac injury like myocardial infarction. Patients identified with acute myocarditis by the investigators will receive standard clinical testing as appropriate and will also be consented to participate in a PET study with 64Cu-GRIP B. Over the course of this proposal, the investigators expect to enroll 10 patients who are being evaluated for acute myocarditis determined by current standard of care diagnostic modalities. The investigators will perform this feasibility assessment in parallel to the usual clinical care.

Colchicine Versus Placebo in Acute Myocarditis Patients

Myocarditis is an inflammatory disease of the heart, mostly caused by viruses. Patients with acute myocarditis are exposed to several complications: recurrence, ventricular arrhythmias (from 5 to 30%), heart failure (5-10%), death or heart transplantation (\< 4%). To date, there is no specific treatment for myocarditis. Patient management only focuses upon empirical optimal care of arrhythmia and heart failure. There is a strong rationale for using colchicine in acute myocarditis: * the IL1 (Interleukin1) pathway plays a detrimental role in acute myocarditis. NLRP3 (NOD-like receptor family, pyrin domain containing 3) inflammasome assembly, and subsequent IL-1beta production, are profoundly inhibited by colchicine. * colchicine has been shown to improve cardiac outcomes in inflammatory cardiac disorders, including pericarditis, coronary artery disease, and post pericardiotomy syndrome. * In murine model of CVB3-induced myocarditis (coxsackievirus B3), colchicine improved myocarditis through reduction of NLRP3 activity. * Small case series with improvement of left ejection fraction in myocarditis following low-dose colchicine in addition to conventional heart failure therapy have been reported. With its pleiotropic anti-inflammatory effect in the pro-inflammatory cascade, reducing the myocardial damage and cell death induced during myocarditis, colchicine has the potential to reduce the risk of heart failure and ventricular arrhythmias. Finally, colchicine is a drug widely available, at low cost, and has a long and well-known safety record.

MYTHS-MR Trial (MYocarditis THerapy With Steroids in Patients With Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction)

The goal of this clinical trial is to demonstrate the efficacy of pulsed intravenous methylprednisolone in a single-blind randomized controlled trial versus standard therapy in patients with acute myocarditis and a mildly reduced LVEF. The main question\[s\] it aims to answer are: * is there an increase in LVEF (≥55% or an absolute increase in LVEF ≥ 10%) on echocardiogram after 5 days from randomization in patients treated with pulsed corticosteroid therapy vs. standard therapy? * is there a reduction in the proportion of patients with LVEF \< 55% AND/OR LV dilation on a 6-month CMRI in patients treated pulsed corticosteroid therapy vs. standard therapy? * To assess the effect of corticosteroids on the occurrence of the combined endpoint(1) all-cause death or (2) HTx or (3) long-term LVAD implant or (4) first rehospitalization due to HF or ventricular arrhythmias, or advanced AV block. Participants will be randomized in two arms in a 1:1 ratio. The experimental group will receive pulsed corticosteroid therapy on top of the standard therapy and patients in the placebo group will be treated with a saline solution on top of their standard therapy. All other tests are executed according to standard of care.

Corticoid Therapy in Acute Myocarditis

Refer to the "Detailed Description" section.