Clinical Research Directory

A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of a Single Dose of RABI-767 in Participants With Acute Pancreatitis

The goal of this clinical trial is to test the safety and effectiveness of a single dose of RABI-767 given by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided peripancreatic injection in participants with predicted severe acute pancreatitis. The main question the study aims to answer is: • Is a single-dose of RABI-767 given by EUS-guided peripancreatic injection safe in patients with predicted severe acute pancreatitis. The study also aims to answer: • Is a single-dose of RABI-767 given by EUS-guided peripancreatic injection effective in treating patients with predicted severe acute pancreatitis. Study participants will be randomly assigned (like the flip of a coin) to receive a single dose of RABI-767 plus supportive care or supportive care only. The study sponsor will compare safety and efficacy data collected from participants who receive RABI-767 to participants who receive supportive care only to test if RABI-767 is safe and effective.

FMT for the Prevention of Infectious Complications in Patients With Moderately Severe and Severe Acute Pancreatitis

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) works to prevent infections complications in patients in the late phase of moderately severe or severe acute pancreatitis.

Collecting Medical Information and Tissue Samples From Patients With Pancreatic Cancer or Other Pancreatic Disorders

RATIONALE: Gathering medical information and collecting and storing samples of blood and tissue to test in the laboratory may help doctors develop better ways to screen people at risk for pancreatic cancer or other pancreatic disorders in the future. PURPOSE: This clinical trial is collecting medical information and tissue samples from patients with pancreatic cancer or other pancreatic disorders.

Necrosectomy With Cryotechnology for Accelerated Removal

Pancreatic necrosis is a serious complication of acute pancreatitis. Pancreatic necrosis involves the irreversible death of pancreatic tissue, which can lead to severe health issues, including infections and an increased risk of death. An endoscopic procedure called direct endoscopic necrosectomy (DEN) is typically performed to remove this necrotic pancreatic tissue as a minimally invasive treatment. This procedure is performed using a thin, flexible, lighted tube called an endoscope and endoscopic instruments that are used with working channels through the scope. Current methods for removing necrotic tissue involve using endoscopic devices such as snares, baskets, nets, and forceps. However, these standard methods are often not very effective because the necrotic tissue can be sticky and hard to grasp. This DEN procedure is part of regular clinical care to treat this condition and remove necrotic tissue from the pancreas. For this research study, the same DEN procedure will be followed with the exception of the device used for the removal of the necrotic tissue. Instead of using forceps, snares, or other traditional tools, a cryoprobe will be used. Cryoprobes work by using extremely cold temperatures to freeze and adhere to the necrotic tissue, making it easier to remove. This method might be better because it can secure larger tissue samples and potentially reduce complications associated with traditional methods. Cryotechnology is successfully used in endoscopy to remove necrotic tissue, foreign bodies and more, but has not been extensively tested in pancreatic necrosis. Cryoprobes are FDA approved medical devices with an established safety record. They are used successfully in very sensitive areas such as the lungs. This study aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of cryotechnology for DEN.

Diabetes RElated to Acute Pancreatitis and Its Mechanisms: Metabolic Outcomes Using Novel CGM Metrics

The DREAM-ON study will investigate whether continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is useful to predict risk for developing diabetes mellitus (DM) and pre-diabetes mellitus (PDM), the need for insulin therapy among those who develop DM, and to determine whether CGM can provide insight into the pathophysiology and DM subtype among participants who have experienced an episode of acute pancreatitis (AP). Thus, the results of the DREAM-ON study could inform future clinical practice guidelines for the management AP as well as potentially extending the licensing authorization for CGM to include use in patients with pancreatogenic (Type 3c) DM.

Early Oral Carbohydrate Solution vs Clear Liquid Diet in Acute Pancreatitis

Background: Acute pancreatitis (AP) is an inflammatory condition associated with increased metabolic demands and negative nitrogen balance, making early nutritional support a critical component of management. Concentional practice favored prolonged fasting and delayed oral intake; however, recent evidence supports early oral feeding. Oral carbohydrate solutions (OCS) may provide early caloric support with minimal pancreatic stimulation, but data comparing OCS with clear liquid (CL) diets which is current practice remain limited, particularly in South Asian populations.The Convential diet (CD )group started at liquid diet then progressed towards soft and then solid diet experienced recurring pain at a considerably higher rate than the oral high carbohydrate solution (OCS )group providing essential calories,(13.2% vs. 3.8%, p \< 0.001).OCS showed decrease rate of post prandial recurrent abdominal pain. Objective: To compare oral carbohydrate solution versus clear liquid diet as the initial oral feeding strategy in patients with acute pancreatitis, focusing on feeding intolerance and length of hospital stay. Methods: This prospective randomized controlled trial will be conducted at a tertiary-care hospital in Lahore, Pakistan. Adult patients (18-70 years) with mild to moderately severe acute pancreatitis will be randomized to receive either an oral carbohydrate solution (10% dextrose in water) or a clear liquid diet as the initial oral feed. The primary outcomes will be feeding intolerance within 24 hours and length of hospital stay. Secondary outcomes include time to successful oral feeding, time to soft diet, changes in pain scores, inflammatory markers (CRP, WBC), glycemic response, need for nutritional escalation, complications, and patient satisfaction. Data will be analyzed using SPSS version 26, with a p-value ≤ 0.05 considered statistically significant. Conclusion: If proven safe and effective, oral carbohydrate solution may serve as a simple, cost-effective and well-tolerated alternative to clear liquid diets for early oral feeding in acute pancreatitis, particularly in resource limited settings.

Incidence of Splanchnic Venous Thrombosis in Acute Pancreatitis and it's Correlation With Severity of Pancreatitis

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a common medical condition characterized by inflammation of the pancreas, affecting a significant portion of the population. With approximately one-third of patients experiencing notable morbidity due to local or systemic complications, the severity of the disease is underscored by the presence of acute peripancreatic fluid collections, acute necrotic collections, pseudocysts, and walled-off necrosis1. Notably, vascular complications, such as splanchnic vein thrombosis, further contribute to the increased morbidity and mortality associated with acute pancreatitis2. Splanchnic vein thrombosis encompasses thromboses in the splenic (SpVT), portal (PVT), and superior mesenteric veins (SMVT), either individually or in combination3. These complications are often incidentally discovered during imaging procedures conducted to assess potential complications4. Despite most cases being asymptomatic, fatal complications, including bowel ischemia, liver failure, portal hypertension, and life-threatening bleeding, have been documented, with the risk of splanchnic vein thrombosis escalating with the severity of pancreatitis

Pancreatic Antibiotic Concentration Evaluation Assessment

This observational study aims to evaluate the penetration of intravenously administered antibiotics into pancreatic fluid collections in patients with suspected infected walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN). In selected patients undergoing percutaneous or endoscopic drainage of the collection as part of their clinical care, a small sample of pancreatic fluid will be collected and analyzed to determine the concentration of the administered antibiotic. At the same time, a blood sample will be taken to assess the antibiotic concentration in plasma. By comparing the concentrations in pancreatic fluid and plasma, the study seeks to determine the extent to which different antibiotics (e.g., meropenem or piperacillin-tazobactam) reach the site of infection within the pancreas. All procedures performed as part of the study, with the exception of the antibiotic concentration measurement, are standard components of routine care for patients with complicated acute pancreatitis. Participation in the study does not alter the diagnostic or therapeutic management of the patient. Patients provide written informed consent before enrollment. The results of this study may help optimize antibiotic dosing in patients with infected pancreatic collections and contribute to more effective and individualized treatment strategies in the future.

Study of CM4620 to Reduce the Severity of Pancreatitis Due to Asparaginase

This is a phase I/II clinical trial assessing the tolerability and efficacy of CM4620 in children and young adults with acute pancreatitis caused by asparaginase. The tolerability of CM4620 when given to patients receiving frontline chemotherapy will be determined. The effectiveness in reducing the severity of pancreatitis will be estimated. Primary Objectives To assess the safety of CM4620 administration in children and young adults with asparaginase associated pancreatitis (AAP). To profile dose-limiting toxicities and responses of the patients treated in the dose-finding phase. To estimate the efficacy of CM4620 to prevent pseudocyst or necrotizing pancreatitis in children with AAP. Secondary Objectives To determine the effect of CM4620 on the incidence of severe pancreatitis To determine the effect of CM4620 on the incidence of Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS).

Diabetes RElated to Acute Pancreatitis and Its Mechanisms

The overriding objective of DREAM is to conduct a prospective longitudinal (36 months) observational clinical study to investigate the incidence, etiology, and pathophysiology of diabetes mellitus (DM) following acute pancreatitis (AP).

Registry of Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Management of Pancreatic Fluid Collections

Acute pancreatitis is one of the most common gastrointestinal disorders requiring hospitalization worldwide. Pancreatic fluid collections can occur as a consequence of acute and chronic pancreatitis and can result in significant morbidity and mortality, including significant abdominal pain, gastric outlet obstruction, biliary obstruction, organ failure, persistent unwellness, infection and sepsis. Symptomatic pancreatic fluid collections require treatment, and endoscopic drainage is considered standard of care. The aim of this study is to evaluate the treatment outcomes in patients undergoing standard of care, endoscopic treatment of pancreatic fluid collections.

Timing of CHolecystectomy In Severe PAncreatitis

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare outcomes for interval or early laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with moderately severe and severe pancreatitis. The main question\[s\] it aims to answer are: * To establish whether there is a difference in surgical outcomes comparing patients diagnosed with severe or moderately severe pancreatitis on which early cholecystectomy was performed versus performing interval cholecystectomy. * The primary endpoint will be to evaluate major complications, defined as a Clavien-Dindo score greater than or equal to III/V. * Secondary endpoints include evaluating minor complications (defined as a Clavien-Dindo score below III/V), biliary disease recurrence, mortality, postoperative hospital stay and postoperative admittance into an intensive care unit. Participants will be randomly assigned to either group: early cholecystectomy during the pancreatitis hospitalization or interval cholecystectomy scheduled 4 weeks after clinical resolution of pancreatitis.

Randomised Treatment of Acute Pancreatitis With Infliximab: Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multi-centre Trial (RAPID-I)

This study evaluates the effectiveness and safety of infliximab in the treatment of acute pancreatitis in adults. A third of participants will receive one single dose of infliximab via infusion, another third will receive a higher dose of infliximab via infusion and the final third of participants will receive a placebo infusion.

Fecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT) in Patients With Moderate to Severe Acute Pancreatitis

This study is a randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled study. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FMT in patients with moderate to severe acute pancreatitis.

iMmune SignAtures and Clinical outComes in AP

The MoSAIC study is a prospective, observational study designed to develop an early prediction tool for severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) and define a distinct immunologic profile compared to moderate acute pancreatitis (MAP). The aims are to validate a new multi-cytokine panel for early prediction of SAP and to identify the specific immune cells that correspond with cytokine signatures in early acute pancreatitis to characterize the immune pathways driving the development of SAP. Participants will provide blood samples and complete patient surveys and interviews within 36 hours of hospital presentation, at 48 hours, and hospital day 7 (if admitted). Data on hospital stay, medical history, clinical course, and severity of disease will be collected.

Conventional Endoscopic Techniques Versus EndoRotor® System for Necrosectomy of Walled of Necrosis

In acute pancreatitis, approximately 20% of the cases result in severe necrotizing pancreatitis which is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Necrotizing pancreatitis is characterized by the development of an acute necrotic collection and as this collection persists beyond 4 weeks, walled off necrosis (WON) encapsulates the collection. To date, this is treated by the step-up approach, which contains percutaneous drainage and minimally invasive video assisted retroperitoneal debridement (VARD) or endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided drainage followed by direct endoscopic necrosectomy (DEN). Different DEN techniques are available for the treatment of WON, however, there is a lack of effective endoscopic instruments to perform DEN. Recently, the first dedicated alternative to conventional DEN has been cleared for use, namely the EndoRotor® Resection System. This device is a powered mechanical debridement device intended for use in endoscopic procedures to resect and remove necrotic debris during DEN for WON. Previous (pilot and feasibility) studies showed promising results in terms of the amount of procedures, adverse events and length of hospital stay. Therefore, aim of this study is to assess the performance of the EndoRotor, as compared to conventional endoscopic techniques, for direct endoscopic necrosectomy (DEN) of walled off necrosis (WON) in a randomized controlled trial.

Pancreatitis - Microbiome as Predictor of Severity II

The goal of this observational study is to evaluate the orointestinal microbiome and microbial derived metabolome in patients suffering from acute pancreatitis as a biomarker for severity. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Can the orointestinal microbiome robustly predict the course of acute pancreatitis? * How does the microbiome impact the severity of an acute pancreatitis? Buccal/ rectal swabs, plasma and stool is collected from patients with acute pancreatitis within 48h after hospital admission.

DEciphering CIrculating SIgnatures Of Infected Pancreatic Necrosis

The purpose of the study is to identify novel blood-based biomarkers for prediction and diagnosis of infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN) in patients with necrotizing pancreatitis (NP). Acute pancreatitis (AP) is the leading cause of gastrointestinal hospital admissions, accounting for over 300,000 emergency department visits annually and imposing a significant socio-economic burden. It is an acute inflammatory condition of the pancreas characterized by damage to the acinar cells, which triggers an inflammatory response and causes widespread systemic damage. In about 20% of cases, the disease progresses to necrotizing pancreatitis (NP), a severe form characterized by tissue necrosis. NP poses serious health risks, especially when the necrotic tissue becomes infected, leading to infected (peri-)pancreatic necrosis (IPN), which is associated with secondary organ failure (OF), sepsis, and mortality rates as high as 40%. While patients with sterile (peri-)pancreatic necrosis (SPN) can often be managed conservatively, those with IPN typically require antibiotics and therapeutic interventions such as endoscopic drainage or surgery. Timely recognition and treatment of IPN are crucial for improving patient outcomes, yet current diagnostic methods based on clinical symptoms and routine lab markers lack the specificity to reliably distinguish SPN from IPN in the early stages. Furthermore, while multifactorial scoring systems like Ranson, Imrie, and APACHE II predict necrosis and overall severity in AP, they are not accurate for identifying IPN or predicting mortality in NP. The diagnostic gap delays appropriate treatment, allowing the infection to advance and limiting available therapeutic options. The growing incidence and significant impact of AP and NP in the general population underscore the urgent need to better understand IPN pathophysiology and to develop specific diagnostic biomarkers that can improve prognosis, guide therapeutic decisions, and enhance patient outcomes.

Rectal Indomethacin as Early Treatment for Acute Pancreatitis (INDOMAP Trial)

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is an inflammatory condition of the pancreas following the activated pancreatic enzymes induced by varied causes, with or without other organ(s) dysfunction. The production and release of inflammatory factors is generally considered as the key factor of pathogenesis. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the most commonly applied agents for inflammatory diseases. A series studies have proved that indomethacin can reduce the risk of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), but high-quality evidence is still lacking in the field of effectiveness of NSAIDs to treat, rather than prevent, other types of AP. Majority of animal experiments showed that NSAIDs had protective effects for organ functions, but the results of several preliminary clinical studies were inconsistent. Randomized controlled trials are eagerly awaited to elucidate its effects on AP.

Safety, Tolerability and Performance of the NucleoCapture Extracorporeal Therapeutic Apheresis Device in the Reduction of Circulating cfDNA/NETs in Subjects With Pancreatitis

This is a single-centre, randomised-controlled, open-label, feasibility study to assess the safety, tolerability and performance of the NucleoCapture extracorporeal apheresis device in the reduction of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA)/Neutrophil Extracellular Traps (NETs) in patients with severe acute pancreatitis.

Therapeutic Effect of Bifidobacterium Longum in Patients with Acute Pancreatitis: a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

The purpose of this clinical trial is to investigate the impact of Bifidobacterium longum(BL) on the clinical prognosis of patients with acute pancreatitis(AP), to analyze the correlation between BL and intestinal barrier function, as well as the gut microbiota, and to observe adverse reactions and risks in patients with AP after the use of BL. Participants will be randomly assigned to two groups: the intervention group and the control group. They will receive: * Intervention group: Standard clinical treatment + BL capsules (10\^10 CFU), twice a day, for a total of 14 days; * Control group: Standard clinical treatment + placebo capsules, for a total of 14 days. A total of 60 patients will be included in this study.

PrEveNtion of Biliary Events After Acute Pancreatitis in NonSUrgicaL PAtients: PENINSULA Trial

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a common condition and its main etiology is biliary. Cholecystectomy is the standard preventive treatment for recurrence of AP after admission. However, due to an increasingly older population and increased patient comorbidity, it is not always a possible option these days. If cholecystectomy is not performed, there is a significant risk for a recurrence of a biliopancreatic event (pancreatitis, biliary colic, choledocholithiasis, cholecystitis or cholangitis) of around 50% in the first year. This can lead to further episodes of pain, patient readmissions, and a reduced quality of life. Additionally, frequent readmissions can create a high cost burden on the health system. Currently, certain clinical guidelines propose biliary sphincterotomy as an alternative for patients in whom surgery is not feasible. However, this recommendation is based on retrospective studies with small sample size and the adherence to this recommendation is very low (12-23%). The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the recurrence of biliopancreatic events in the first year after admission for an acute biliary pancreatitis episode in patients that are not suitable for surgery. The main question it aims to answer is: Does biliary sphincterotomy prevent biliopancreatic event recurrence in non surgical patients after an episode of biliary acute pancreatitis? Researchers will compare biliary sphincterotomy vs conservative treatment to see if there is a reduction in biliopancreatic events during the first year after admission for acute pancreatitis in non surgical patients. Participants will be randomized to conservative treatment or biliary sphincterotomy and will be followed up for one year at 1 month, 6 months and 12 months to evaluate recurrence of BPE, readmissions, quality of life and mortality. Security of the technique will also be assessed in this specific population.

Prognostic Value of Different Nutritional Screening Tools in Acute Pancreatitis

The goal of this observational study is to compare the prognostic value of different nutritional screening tools to predict the course of acute pancreatitis. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Which nutritional screening tool performs best to predict length of hospital stay? * Which nutritional screening tool performs best to predict clinical outcome (disease severity, length of hospital stay, mortality, need for rehospitalization)? Participants will answer questions regarding their nutritional status and undergo basic anthropometric assessments (e.g. measurement of waist circumference) to evaluate their risk of malnutrition.

METabolomic and Immune PROfiling in the Development of Pancreatic Fistulas After cepHalic duodEnopancreatectomy

Pancreatoduodenectomy is the standard surgical operation for benign or malign pancreatic lesions. Pancreatic Fistula (PF) or Postpancreatectomy Acute Pancreatitis (PPAP) are the major complications associated with that type of surgery. We need to develop preventive measures for these complications, which requires a better understanding of their physiopathology. The aim of this prospective monocentric and observational study is to identify predictive biomarkers and/or risk factors for PF or PPAP using metabolomics. The Profiling of circulating metabolites is indeed an original and promising approach for this purpose. We will also investigate the patient's immune status and its association with the occurrence of post-surgical complications. Participants will be adult patients scheduled to undergo elective pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surgery and patient's management will be as usual. During surgery, a fragment (0.1-0.2 g) of non-tumoral pancreatic tissue will be removed and frozen at -80°C for metabolomic analysis. For immunological assessment, 4 blood samples will be collected (before surgery and then 7 days, 1 and 3 months after, blood sampling).