Clinical Research Directory

OMT for Adhesive Capsulitis

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment (OMT) is an effective addition to treatment of adhesive capsulitis. OMT is a non-invasive treatment in which a doctor gently moves and stretches muscles, joints, and tissues manually. Adhesive capsulitis is more commonly known as "frozen shoulder" and describes a shoulder that becomes stiff, painful, and limited in its motion due to some structural change in the joint. The main questions it aims to answer are: Is recovery faster when OMT is added to regular treatment? Are patients that underwent OMT more satisfied with their treatment? Researchers will compare patients who underwent OMT to patients who did not to see if OMT is an effective additional treatment for frozen shoulder. Participants will: * Be assigned to one of the four experimental groups * Visit clinic and/or physical therapy to undergo the treatments associated with their group: 1. standard course of prescribed physical therapy 2. standard course of prescribed physical therapy and an injection of an anti-inflammatory and anesthetics in the shoulder 3. standard course of prescribed physical therapy and (up to) 4 OMT sessions 4. standard course of prescribed physical therapy, an injection of an anti-inflammatory and anesthetics in the shoulder, and (up to) 4 OMT sessions. * Visit clinic 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after treatment is complete * Complete a survey about how satisfied they are with their treatment 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after it is complete

Capsular Distension Versus Corticosteroid Injection in Adhesive Capsulitis

Adhesive capsulitis is a common and disabling shoulder condition characterized by pain and progressive limitation of range of motion. Capsular distension and intra-articular corticosteroid injection are commonly used therapeutic options, often combined with rehabilitation, but their comparative effectiveness remains debated. The objective of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the efficacy and tolerance of ultrasound-guided capsular distension combined with rehabilitation versus intra-articular corticosteroid injection combined with rehabilitation in patients with adhesive capsulitis. Outcomes will include shoulder pain, range of motion, functional disability, patient satisfaction, and procedure-related complications, assessed at short, mid, and long-term follow-up.

Effectiveness and Efficiency of an Upper Limb Active-Passive Exoskeleton Robot in Patients With Frozen Shoulder

Frozen shoulder, also known as adhesive capsulitis, is a common chronic shoulder disorder with symptoms including shoulder pain, limitations in both active and passive range of motion, and muscle weakness, which significantly affects daily functional abilities. The investigator applied upper limb exoskeleton-assisted therapy. This experiment used a randomized controlled trial to assess the clinical rehabilitation effects of exoskeleton-assisted range of motion and resistance training on patients with frozen shoulder.

Anterior vs Posterior vs Combined Intra-Articular Injections for Adhesive Capsulitis

This randomized controlled clinical trial aims to compare the efficacy of three different intra-articular injection approaches (anterior, posterior, and combined anterior-posterior) in patients with adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder. Thirty participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups and treated with a standardized injection solution consisting of corticosteroid, lidocaine, and saline. Clinical outcomes will be evaluated using pain scores, functional scales, and imaging parameters.

Transcatheter Arterial Embolization Using Nexsphere-F for Chronic Shoulder Pain Refractory to Conservative Treatment

Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of transcatheter arterial embolization using 'Nexsphere-F' for pain relief in patients with adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder joint that does not respond to conservative treatment. This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of transcatheter arterial embolization using embolic agents in patients with adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder joint. This is a single-center, prospective, open-label, randomized clinical trial.

Frozen Shoulder and Hormone Replacement Therapy

The purpose of this study is to determine the effects of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in addition to standard treatment on frozen shoulder symptoms in women with age-related changes to their menstrual cycle. Frozen shoulder refers to the condition a doctor diagnosed the participant with regarding shoulder pain, stiffness, and progressive loss of range of motion. Age-related menstrual cycle changes, known as perimenopause and/or menopause, refers to a change or stoppage of monthly menstrual cycles. Other symptoms participants may be experiencing include vaginal dryness, hot flashes, or night sweats. Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) refers to medicine with female hormones in it. For this study, HRT will be in the form of a patch that goes on the skin and a daily oral pill. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either HRT plus standard care, or only standard care. Follow-up tests will be completed at 6 months of treatment to assess participant progress.

Suprascapular Nerve Block in the Management of Patients Diagnosed With Adhesive Capsulitis

This study aims to compare the efficacy of different suprascapular nerve block techniques in patients diagnosed with adhesive capsulitis. Adhesive capsulitis, commonly known as frozen shoulder, is a condition characterized by pain and restricted range of motion in the shoulder joint, significantly affecting quality of life. The suprascapular nerve provides sensory innervation to the shoulder joint; therefore, nerve blockade is frequently used to alleviate pain. However, there are limited studies evaluating the difference in efficacy between proximal and distal suprascapular nerve blocks. In this research, two different blockade techniques-at the suprascapular notch and the spinoglenoid notch-will be compared in patients diagnosed with adhesive capsulitis at Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa between 2024 and 2026. The hypothesis of the study is that the block performed at the spinoglenoid notch provides pain relief comparable to the suprascapular notch block while resulting in less motor blockade. Patients participating in the study will be randomly assigned to two groups. Both groups will receive an intra-articular corticosteroid injection into the shoulder joint, along with cold application, Codman exercises, and standard medical therapy. Pre- and post-treatment evaluations will include pain severity (NRS), shoulder function (Modified Constant Score), muscle strength, and range of motion. The results will reveal which technique provides better improvement in shoulder external rotator and abductor muscle strength, shoulder function, and pain relief, thereby offering valuable insights to guide treatment approaches.

Dose Efficacy in Adhesive Capsulitis

The purpose of this study is to find out if the treatment of adhesive capsulitis with 40 mg of methylprednisolone in combination with a hydrodilatation is comparable to 80 mg of methylprednisolone for pain reduction, improving shoulder mobility, and reducing side effects. Researchers will enroll 40 people in this study which is taking place solely at the Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Avenue. This study should take approximately 12 months to complete and the results should be known in about 15 to 18 months. During this study, patients will receive an ultrasound guided shoulder hydrodilatation combined with corticosteroid after "randomized" into one of the groups (40 mg vs 80 mg). This is a double blind study as both patients and physicians would not know the group patient was randomized to. Pain scores, Range of Motion and few other questionnaires wold be completed to track the response to the interventions at baseline prior to injection, four weeks after the procedure and 3 months after the procedure.

Effectiveness of Instrumental Rehabilitation in Patients With Adhesive Capsulitis

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of robotic training compared to conventional rehabilitation in patients with AC.

Evaluation and Treatment of Adhesive Capsulitis Using Non-invasive Neurostimulation Devices

The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the integrity of somatosensory processing with transcranial magnetique stimulation (TMS) and corticospinal excitability of the affected shoulder in individuals with adhesive capsulitis versus healthy controls. The secondary objective is to compare the clinical and neurophysiological effects of an intervention using tendon vibration (VIB) to induced kinesthetic illusions. This will involve comparing two groups: one receiving a real intervention versus a placebo intervention protocol, both coupled with standardized exercises in individuals with capsulitis. The hypotheses are that the proprioceptive processing and corticospinal excitability are impaired in the presence of capsulitis, and that the VIB + exercises intervention will result in greater improvements than the placebo VIB + exercises. To goal is to establish the first empirical foundations for understanding adhesive capsulitis, using cutting-edge neurophysiological investigation technologies. TMS will be used to explore the presence of maladaptive plasticity in motor networks by assessing the excitability and integrity of the primary motor cortex (M1) and the corticospinal tract. Recruitement: 30 healthy participants and 30 participants with a diagnosis of adhesive capsulitis will undergo 2 baselines assesments, 6 interventions with tendon vibration and 2 follow-up evaluation. Participants will be age- and sex-matched. Baseline and follw-up include: * Questionnaires : SPADI, QuickDASH, French version of the Mcgill Pain Questionnaire; * Active and passive range of motion; * Ultrasound for diagnosing capsulitis. Comparison parameters: * active motor threshold (aMT) * Motor evoked potential (MEP) latency and amplitude * Standardized kinesthetic illusion procedure (SKIP) : direction of illusion, clearness, amplitude/speed. Interventions : * 2 baselines including all questionnaires, ultrasound, active and passive range of motion, TMS procedure and SKIP; * 2 VIB interventions per week, for 3 weeks * Real VIB : 80Hz of vibration to induce kinesthetic illusions, * Placebo VIB : 40Hz of vibration that does not induce kinesthetic illusions * 2 follow-up including all questionnaires, ultrasound, active and passive range of motion, TMS procedure and SKIP.