Clinical Research Directory

Clindamycin as an Alternative to Vancomycin in Patients Undergoing Aortic Cardiac Surgery With Extracorporeal Circulation (ECC)

Antibiotic prophylaxis is essential for all types of cardiac surgery under Extracorporeal Circulation (ECC), in order to reduce the incidence of surgical site infection (SSI). However, many patients are allergic to beta-lactam antibiotics. All the more, vancomycin antibiotic recommended as replacement is not without adverse effects and frequently administered in an inappropriate manner in terms of pre-intervention timing, linked to its complex use on peripheral venous lines complicated by venotoxicity. Non-compliance with the correct use of antibiotic prophylaxis in surgery is responsible for nosocomial infections, which have an impact on both the patient and the healthcare establishment in terms of costs, particularly in cardiac surgery. Drug pharmacokinetics are more complex under bypass surgery (high volume of distribution), and studies are needed to determine the correct administration and diffusion of drugs. In this respect, clindamycin is an antibiotic already used in antibiotic prophylaxis for other surgeries (thoracic, orthopedic...) in cases of allergy to beta-lactam antibiotics, but to date there are no studies examining the pharmacokinetics of this molecule in the context of cardiac surgery under ECC. The aim of this protocol is to demonstrate the feasibility of using clindamycin in patients undergoing ECC surgery, by verifying that the plasma concentration of clindamycin exceeds the minimum inhibition concentration (MIC) of the main bacteria involved in mediastinitis throughout the surgical procedure.

Prolonged Chest Tube Treatment to Reduce Rates of Atrial Fibrillation Following Cardiac Surgery

Evacuation of pericardial blood by posterior pericardiotomy or use of a posterior pericardial chest tube lowers postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) rates after cardiac surgery by 45-68%. Although it cannot be generalized due to trial undersizing, posterior pericardial chest tube treatment may be a superior alternative to pericardiotomy, given its low risk of procedural complications. This interventional multicenter trial will assess whether prolonged treatment with a posterior pericardial chest tube lowers POAF rates after cardiac surgery. Investigators will randomize 624 patients undergoing routine cardiac surgery at Nordic sites 1:1 to receive a posterior pericardial chest tube as adjunct to standard care for up to 3 postoperative days or standard care alone. The primary outcome is the proportion of patients with POAF up to 7 days post-surgery; the study will be powered to detect a relative risk reduction of 30% in the intervention arm. Secondary outcomes are AF burden; days with chest tubes and their output; proportion of patients with POAF up to 14 days post-surgery; direct current conversions during hospital admission; length of ICU/hospital stay; postoperative complications, mortality, ischemic stroke, and major bleeding at 30/90 days and 1/3/5 years; and quality of life/postoperative recovery at 90 days and 1 year. This trial may provide quality clinical evidence supporting the adoption of a simple method to prevent POAF, thus reducing healthcare costs.