Clinical Research Directory

Precision of Pacient-specific Instrumented Open Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy vs Conventional Technicque

This study is a randomized clinical trial that will compare two surgical techniques for patients with knee osteoarthritis and varus deformity who are candidates for medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy. The goal is to evaluate whether using patient-specific 3D-printed surgical guides improves the accuracy of the bone cut compared with the conventional technique performed with anatomical landmarks and fluoroscopy. A total of 50 adult patients will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: conventional osteotomy or osteotomy assisted by patient-specific instrumentation (PSI). The main outcome is the accuracy of the osteotomy cut, measured by comparing preoperative planning with the postoperative CT scan. Secondary outcomes include leg alignment, surgical time, radiation exposure, complications, and functional recovery assessed with validated questionnaires (KOOS, WOMAC, IKDC, EQ-5D) and gait analysis using depth cameras. Patients will be followed for up to 12 months after surgery to evaluate clinical and radiological outcomes.

Kinematic Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty - a Double-blind Randomised Controlled Trial Between Robotic and Caliper-based Techniques

Knee replacement surgery is a surgery designed to treat severe arthritis of the knee. However, as many as 20% of patients are not satisfied with the results of their surgery. To place the knee replacement in correct position, the kinematic alignment method, which tries to reproduce the patient normal anatomy, has shown promise in improving the satisfaction after knee replacement surgery. It is not known if using a robotic arm to assist in surgery is better than the traditional method when trying to recreate kinematic alignment. The goal of this study is to learn if robotic assisted surgery is better than traditional method for knee replacement done using kinematic alignment. The main questions the study tries to answer are: 1. Do the radiographs of kinematic knee replacement surgeries done with robotic assistance show better alignment than radiographs of kinematic knee replacements done with the traditional method? 2. Does robotic assisted kinematic knee replacement give better function to patients than traditional knee replacement done with kinematic alignment? 3. Does robotic assisted kinematic knee replacement decrease pain, improve knee movement and improve knee stability better than traditional knee replacement done with kinematic alignment? 4. Are there more complications with robotic assisted kinematic knee replacement in comparison to traditional kinematic knee replacement? 5. How long long does it take a surgeon to become good a performing a kinematic knee replacement using robotic assistance? Researchers will compare knee replacements done using a robotic to make the bone cuts, and compare it to the usual method using guides and manual instruments. All the knee replacements will be done using the kinematic alignment and with the same type of knee replacement prothesis. Participants will: * Have a knee replacement done with the kinematic alignment technique by an experienced surgeon, with or without robotic assistance during the surgery. * Visit the clinic before surgery, six weeks after surgery, three months, six months, twelve months and twenty-four months after the surgery. * Fill questionnaire, have their knee examined and have radiographs of their knee done at each visit.