Clinical Research Directory

Compare the Difference in Occlusal Force Distribution and Denture Retention Using 2 Different Denture Base Materials in Implant Retained Overdenture

The global increase in the aging population has led to a rise in total edentulism, which remains a major public health concern. two-implant-retained mandibular overdentures have been regarded as the standard of care, offering superior retention, stability, comfort, and masticatory efficiency compared to conventional dentures. Among available attachment systems-bar, ball, stud, and magnet-the Equator attachment has gained popularity due to its low vertical profile, suitability for limited inter-occlusal space, and ease of handling. Assessment of masticatory performance and occlusal balance can be objectively measured using devices such as bite force analyzers and the computerized T-Scan system, which quantifies occlusion and disocclusion times. Conventional heat-cured polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) remains the most widely used denture base material; however, it has mechanical and biological limitations. Flexible denture base materials have been introduced to overcome these drawbacks by enhancing adaptation, distributing occlusal loads more evenly, and improving comfort and retention.

Using Two Different Attachments in Mandibular Implant Overdenture Cases in Order to Retention and Patient Satisfaction

The Goal of the clinical trail is to evaluate the efficacy of Bar- OT Equator attachment on retention and patient satisfaction in comparison to the standard technique using Bar- clip attachment. Patients will visit the clinic after the surgery and after the attachment insertion for check ups and during the follow up periods ( at denture insertion, 3 months and 6 months)