Clinical Research Directory

CD20 Monoclonal Antibody Combined With BTK Inhibitor for the Treatment of Refractory Immune-related Cytopenia

This study aims to utilize anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies to eliminate peripheral B cells and reduce the mechanism of autoantibody production, as well as combine the mechanism of BTK inhibitors (BTKi) blocking the B cell receptor signaling pathway and inhibiting B cell activation and proliferation, for the treatment of refractory immune-related cytopenia. In this study, it includes the salvage treatment of immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) and autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA), expecting to achieve a synergistic and enhancing effect. This study aims to select Zuberitamab, a human-mouse chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, and the BTKi Orelabrutinib as combination therapy options. The clinical efficacy of the Zuberitamab-Orelabrutinib combination therapy (overall response rate, duration of sustained remission) will be evaluated, along with its safety profile (including infections, bleeding, cardiac toxicity), to provide a theoretical basis for their combined use in treating refractory immune-related thrombocytopenia (ITP and AIHA).

Zanubrutinib and Acalabrutinib Use and Risk of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Chronic B-cell Malignancies

Background. Zanubrutinib and acalabrutinib are both associated with an increased risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) but AF comparative risk between these 2 BTK inhibitors (BTKis) remains largely unknown. Objectives. Our aim was to examine the risk of developing incident AF with zanubrutinib exposure compared with acalabrutinib exposure. Methods. Using the TriNetX research network database, authors will conduct a retrospective cohort analysis of deidentified, aggregate adult patients with chronic B-cell malignancies and exposed to zanubrutinib or acalabrutinib. Patients will be divided into 2 groups based on zanubrutinib or acalabrutinib exposure. After propensity score matching (PSM), Cox proportional hazard models will be used to calculate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to compare the 2 matched groups. The appropriateness of the proportional hazard assumption will be examined and risk differences (RDs) will be used if appropriate. Results will summarized with the use of Kaplan-Meier survival curves.

Zanubrutinib Plus GCVP (Obinutuzumab, Cyclophosphamide, Vindesine, Prednisolone) in Previously Untreated Follicular Lymphoma

Previously untreated patients with follicular lymphoma are treated with the ZGCVP regimen (zanubrutinib, obinutuzumab, cyclophosphamide, vindesine, prednisolone) for 6 cycles.

Zanubrutinib, Chidamide, and Rituximab Induction With or Without CHOP Versus R-CHOP in Newly Diagnosed Double-Expressor DLBCL

Zanubrutinib, as a new generation of BTK inhibitors, has shown more potent antitumor activity and lower adverse reactions than ibrutinib in head-to-head clinical studies, which make it a promising regimen for B cell lymphoma. Chidamide is an oral subtype-selective histone deacetylase inhibitor. This Randomized, Multicenter, Open-Label Phase II Clinical Study is comparing the efficacy and safety of Zanubrutinib, Chidamide, and Rituximab induction therapy sequentially combined with or without CHOP versus R-CHOP in the first-line treatment of patients with newly diagnosed double-expressor DLBCL.

Ibrutinib and Acalabrutinib Use and Risk of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Chronic B-cell Malignancies

Background. Ibrutinib and acalabrutinib are both associated with an increased risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) but AF comparative risk between these 2 BTK inhibitors (BTKis) remains largely unknown. Objectives. Our aim was to examine the risk of developing incident AF with ibrutinib exposure compared with acalabrutinib exposure. Methods. Using the TriNetX research network database, authors will conduct a retrospective cohort analysis of deidentified, aggregate adult patients with chronic B-cell malignancies and exposed to ibrutinib or acalabrutinib. Patients will be divided into 2 groups based on ibrutinib or acalabrutinib exposure. After propensity score matching (PSM), hazard ratios (HRs) and their associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) will be used to compare AF risk during follow-up between the matched 2 groups.