Clinical Research Directory

Towards a More Standardized Bicuspid Aortic Valve Repair: Rationale and Design of CONTOUR Trial - a Randomized Trial

Background: Between one-third and one-half of patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) disease develop significant aortic regurgitation (AR) at a young age, leading to cardiomyopathy and heart failure. Aortic valve repair is an evolving and still underused strategy in BAV patients with AR. The lack of sufficient standardization remains the main limitation of current repair techniques, resulting in an increased risk of AR recurrence and reoperation. The most controversial issue is the stabilization of the BAV annulus. The CONTOUR trial aims to compare two different BAV annuloplasty concepts in a prospective randomized study. Methods: CONTOUR is a multicenter, randomized controlled trial designed to enroll 100 consecutive BAV patients with AR across four sites in Germany. BAV AR patients with an asymmetric configuration and without concomitant root aneurysm will be randomized 1:1 to undergo aortic valve repair using an internal HAART 200 annuloplasty device (i.e., INTERNAL group) (n=50) or external annuloplasty (i.e., double external ring annuloplasty) in the EXTERNAL group (n=50). 4D flow MRI will be performed preoperatively (t1), postoperatively at discharge (t2), and at 1-year follow-up (t3) for rater-blinded assessment of hemodynamic profiles (i.e., flow eccentricity) and regurgitation fraction at the MRI core-lab. Two hierarchically ordered primary endpoints will be considered: (1) postoperative reduction of flow eccentricity at hospital discharge and (2) regurgitation fraction (%) at 1-year follow-up. Discussion: The CONTOUR trial is designed to test the hypothesis that an internal annuloplasty device, creating a completely symmetric post-repair BAV geometry, achieves superior aortic valve repair outcomes compared to external annuloplasty. If our hypothesis is confirmed, our study will significantly influence aortic valve repair practice and contribute to the refinement of guideline recommendations in the management of BAV patients with AR.

TAVR vs. SAVR Study of VitaFlow Liberty® for Severe BAV Stenosis

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Transcatheter aortic valve and retrievable delivery system (VitaFlow Liberty®) for the treatment of severe bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) stenosis.

Sapien 3 Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Young Aortic Valve Stenosis Patients From China

Safety, effectiveness and durability of Sapien 3 transcatheter aortic valve replacement in young aortic valve stenosis patients from China：A multi-center, retrospective and prospective, single arm, observational study

Cardiovascular Health Improvement Project

The goal of this project is to establish a biobank of clinical information, DNA, plasma, and aortic tissue samples from patients with cardiovascular disease as well as healthy controls.

A Study of Chinese Congenital Bicuspid Aortic Valve

Pervious studies indicated that the prevalence of bicuspid aortic valve（BAV） might be higher in China. There is a familial predisposition to the development of BAV. The study analyzed epidemiological data on selected BAV and established a BAV cohort to observe disease progression and treatment outcomes.

Size Up Bicuspid With the LIra MEthod: the SUBLIME Study

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) outcomes in patients with raphe-type bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) are still suboptimal for the non negligible rate of stroke and permanent pacemaker implantation. There is still lack of consensus on the optimal sizing method for prosthesis selection in BAV patients. The objective of the present study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the LIRA sizing method in raphe-type BAV patients undergoing TAVR.