Clinical Research Directory

Screw-Integrated vs Traditional Cervical Cages in ACDF for Degenerative Disc Disease

This study is a prospective, comparative clinical trial conducted at Assiut University Hospitals to evaluate the effectiveness of two different interbody fusion devices in patients with Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease (CDDD). The primary objective is to compare cervical cages with integrated screws against traditional stand-alone cervical cages during single or double-level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF). While ACDF is the gold standard for CDDD, traditional cages can sometimes lead to complications like subsidence or incomplete fusion; integrated screw designs aim to provide immediate stability and reduce these risks. Investigators will assess 40 patients over a 12-month follow-up period, focusing on primary outcomes of radiological interbody fusion using the Daniel Riew grading system. Secondary outcomes include the maintenance of cervical alignment (Ishihara Index), change in segmental angles (Cobb's method), disc height restoration, and clinical improvements in pain and function measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Neck Disability Index (NDI). The study's rationale is to provide clearer evidence on whether screw-integrated cages offer superior radiological and clinical outcomes to help guide future surgical preferences

Post-Market Data Collection to Evaluate the Performance of the Synergy Disc®

This is a real world data collection observational study at a single site. There are both prospective and retrospective cohorts. The study will examine the safety and effectiveness of the Synergy cervical disc system in patients with degenerative cervical disc disease.

Real World Data Collection on the Synergy Disc

This is a real world data collection observational study at a single site. There are both prospective and retrospective cohorts. The study will examine the safety and effectiveness of the Synergy cervical disc system in patients with degenerative cervical disc disease.

The Synergy Disc To Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

A multicenter, prospective, non-randomized, historically controlled study. Demonstrate the Synergy Disc is at least as safe and effective as conventional anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) to treat cervical degenerative disc disease (DDD) in subjects who are symptomatic at only one level from C3 to C7 that are unresponsive to conservative management. Patients will be evaluated preoperatively, at the time of surgery, and at 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. Follow-up will continue annually until the last patient reaches 24-month follow-up. The primary analysis will occur at 24 months.

Post Market Data Collection Protocol to Evaluate the Performance of the Synergy Disc

This is a real world data collection observational study at a single site. There are both prospective and retrospective cohorts. The study will examine the safety and effectiveness of the Synergy cervical disc system in patients with degenerative cervical disc disease.

The Synergy Disc for the Treatment of 2 Level Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease Compared With Cervical Fusion Surgery

A multicenter, prospective, non-randomized, historically controlled study. To demonstrate the Synergy Disc is at least as safe and effective as conventional anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) to treat cervical degenerative disc disease (DDD) in subjects who are symptomatic at two levels from C3 to C7 are and are unresponsive to conservative management. Patients will be evaluated preoperatively, at the time of surgery, and at 6 weeks, and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. Follow-up will continue annually until the last patient reaches 24-month follow-up. The primary analysis will occur at 24 months.

M6-C Post Approval Study (PAS)

The M6-C Post Approval Study is a long term follow-up study of subjects previously enrolled and treated in the M6-C Artificial Cervical Disc IDE Study.

Minimally Invasive Posterior Decompression of the Cervical Spine

Degenerative stenosis of the cervical spinal canal may be caused by the compression of the posterior part of the dural sac and spinal cord by the hypertrophied ligamentum flavum and facet joints, by the compression of the anterior part of the dural sac and spinal cord by the posterior longitudinal ligament, vertebral osteophytes and protrusion/ herniation. The choice of surgical treatment in such cases is challenging. Posterior decompression and fixation is often proposed, but it is associated with a traumatic posterior approach, a large wound, and blood loss, a high risk of surgery site infections, and also instability of the metal fixation is possible. Also important is the increase in the surgical procedure cost due to the use of metal implants. An excellent alternative to standard posterior decompression and fixation is a method with isolated decompression of the cervical canal via posterior approach, which does not require any metal fixation.