Clinical Research Directory

A Novel mHealth Intervention to Improve Outcomes of Children With Medical Complexity

Children with medical complexity (CMC) are the most vulnerable of children with chronic diseases, who have complex, multisystem chronic diseases affecting ≥3 organ systems, severe functional limitations and technology dependencies. CMC have high health care needs, and account for 40% of hospitalized children and 35% of all pediatric health care costs. Due to high medical fragility, CMC have frequent acute deteriorations superimposed on their chronic conditions, leading to recurrent emergency department (ED)/hospital admissions and affecting quality of life (QOL). To reduce ED/hospital admissions for CMC, remote monitoring is suggested, with use of mHealth apps to regularly assess their health status remotely and identify early signs of acute deterioration, allowing for early interventions to prevent ED/hospital admissions. Yet no app to support remote monitoring of CMC exists. Variable, multisystem conditions among CMC make it difficult to develop an app. Also, many CMC are at high-risk for health care inequities, with minorities having higher unmet needs, but the impacts of health care inequities and social determinants of health (SDOH) on ED/hospital admissions in CMC are rarely studied. Fortunately, ED/hospital admissions for CMC are often preceded by a limited set of shared (crosscutting) acute symptoms. These crosscutting symptoms rarely occur suddenly. Studies suggest that they usually start as subtle signs, often unnoticed by parents until they escalate to prompt an ED/hospital visit. Thus, crosscutting symptoms offer an opportunity for a novel and practical approach for developing a remote monitoring app for CMC, despite their multiple, variable underlying conditions. In a focus group, parents identified the crosscutting symptoms that most often preceded their children's hospital admissions, and conveyed their needs, preferences and key functionalities that led to MyChildCMC, the first app designed to monitor and identify early signs of crosscutting symptoms in CMC. In a pilot trial of 50 subjects, we confirmed feasibility of MyChildCMC use by parents, ability to detect early signs 2-14 days prior to ED/hospital admissions, and use leading significantly to fewer hospital days than controls. The current study will assess the efficacy and sustainability of MyChildCMC in a fully-powered 6-month, 2-arm (MyChildCMC vs usual care) trial of CMC (age 1-18 years) and their parents. Parents assigned to MyChildCMC will use the app daily for 6 months, both arms will receive financial incentive for participation, then we will stop the incentive and follow subjects for 6 more months to assess sustainability at 12 months. We will also assess if MyChildCMC use will help reduce or eliminate inequities in ED/hospital admissions. Specific Aims are: 1) Determine MyChildCMC's efficacy on 1.a. Child (ED/hospital use, hospital days and QOL) and 1.b. Parent (satisfaction, self-efficacy and stress) outcomes; 2) Compare ED/hospital use among racial/ethnic and SDOH subgroups to assess potential effect of MyChildCMC on inequities.

E-PRIME For Children With Medical Complexity

Children with medical complexity (CMC) have very high needs for health and support services. CMC have very rare diseases that involve multiple organ systems. As a result, all CMC have multiple chronic conditions and need care from many specialists and services. While there are important benefits to the child and family in living at home, the continuing need for complex medical care places a profound burden on caregivers. Telehealth has long been considered a potential solution to barriers in access to care for children. The purpose of this research is to test whether telehealth can help pediatric primary care providers (PCPs) as they treat, monitor, and manage children with medical complexity (CMC). Additionally, it is to reduce caregiver and child burden as well as improve care coordination between multiple providers.

Let's E.A.T.! (Eating With Assistive Technology): An Intervention to Support Children With Feeding Tubes and Tracheostomies

The overall objective of this proposal is to test an interdisciplinary intervention to support the transition to oral feeding for children with feeding tubes and tracheostomies. The investigators' model which combines in-home clinical assessments with virtual therapies may maximize the impact of expert interventionists. The investigators' central hypothesis is that children with feeding tubes and tracheostomies will have greater success than a control group when enrolled in a hybrid in-person/virtual intervention including: (1) a coordinated feeding team with an occupational therapist, speech/language pathologist, and registered dietitian; (2) family liaison study coordinators who are poised to support the family through personal experience; (3) a project leader who is a Developmental Behavioral Pediatrician with expertise in children with tracheostomies. The overall objective of this proposal is to test this intervention to increase oral feeding in children with feeding tubes and tracheostomies. To pursue this objective, the investigators propose the following aims: Specific Aim 1: Children enrolled in the intervention group will have improved caregiver self-efficacy and reduced worry related to feeding as determined by The Feeding and Swallowing Impact Survey at the end of a 1-year intervention. Specific Aim 2: Children enrolled in the intervention group will have increased oral vs. tube-fed calories and reduced dependence on feeding tubes as determined by detailed dietary histories and The Children's Eating and Drinking Activity Scale (CEDAS) at the end of a 1-year intervention. The investigators' intervention will determine if a tertiary center of expertise can use a combination of home assessments and virtual interventions to address critical feeding needs for children with tracheostomies. Future clinicians could refer patients to the investigators' center instead of relying on community therapists, who rarely exist. The weekly feeding group sessions as well as the administration of the therapies in a virtual format are research-related. While the therapy techniques implemented during the study are standard of care and within the practice parameters of the practitioners involved, the use of them in a virtual format are novel and should be considered research-related.