Clinical Research Directory

A Web-Based Tool to Help People With Health Conditions Make Contraceptive Decisions

Among people who do not want to get pregnant, some do not use any birth control. This is also called contraceptive nonuse. Common reasons for contraceptive nonuse include concerns about birth control safety or side effects. People with health conditions, such as diabetes or high blood pressure, also report worries about how different birth control methods might affect their health condition or medicines. The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if a web tool called My Health, My Choice helps people with health conditions understand their birth control options and choose birth control that is right for them. The study will also look at the medical safety of birth control methods that participants decide to use. The main questions it aims to answer are: • Does the My Health My Choice tool lower the number of participants who do not use any birth control method? (contraceptive nonuse) In other words, does the My Health My Choice tool increase the number of participants who use any birth control method? (contraceptive use) Participants who use the My Health, My Choice tool before a clinic visit with their clinician (Intervention Group) will be compared to participants who only go to a clinic visit with their clinician (Usual Care Group). For this study, a "clinician" is any licensed health care provider who counsels about birth control, prescribes birth control, and/or inserts birth control devices. All participants will: * Complete 4-5 online surveys that take 5-10 minutes each, over a 3 month time period * Be asked to go to a scheduled clinic visit with their health care provider * A small group of participants (about 30) will be invited to a 1 hour exit interview Participants in the intervention arm will be asked to: • Use the My Health My Choice tool before their clinic visit

Psychometric Validation of the Flemish Version of the Transition Readiness Assessment Questionnaire (TRAQ 6.0) in Young People With Chronic Conditions

Healthcare transition, which involves preparing children and adolescents for the shift from pediatric to adult healthcare, received increased attention in recent years. Evidence and consensus suggest that effective healthcare transition has long-term benefits for patients, including better adherence to treatment, improved follow-up, and reduced morbidity. The American Academy of Pediatrics published guidelines in 2018 to facilitate good transitions, and similar guidelines were issued by NICE in 2016. Various psychosocial questionnaires are available to assess the self-management skills of adolescents and young adults during this transition (i.e., transition readiness). The most well-known and widely used questionnaire is the Transition Readiness Assessment Questionnaire (TRAQ). Despite its widespread use and validation in other languages, there is currently no validated Flemish version. This observational study aims to validate the Dutch version of the TRAQ for psychometric reliability. The study will conduct a psychometric validation of the Flemish TRAQ 6.0 following the ISPOR guidelines. The validation process will include: Preparation and forward-backward translation; Harmonization between different language versions; and administering the final questionnaire to a larger sample to assess validity and reliability. Demographic data (age, sex, ethnicity/nationality, and parental education level) and medical information (type of chronic condition, age of diagnosis, timing of transfer to adult care (if known), and unaccompanied hospital visits) will be collected. The calculated sample size is 90 participants, with a significance level of 0.05, a power of 0.80, and an estimated effect size of 0.6. Considering a 40% risk of non-response, the final sample size will be at least 150 participants. Eligible participants are adolescents and young adults aged 16 to 25 years, diagnosed with at least one chronic condition, receiving medical follow-ups in secondary or tertiary care hospitals, and able to read and speak Flemish Dutch.

Evaluating Covered California's Grocery Support Program

This is a pragmatic randomized controlled trial (RCT) of Covered California's Grocery Support Program. This pragmatic RCT will test the efficacy of providing a monthly food card benefit for adults with food insecurity, a chronic condition, and incomes below 250% of the federal poverty level (FPL) compared with a group who receives a lump sum payment.

ElderTree Via a Voice Activated Device for Managing Chronic Health Conditions (NHLBI)

Multiple chronic conditions (MCCs) are costly and pervasive among older adults. MCCs account for 90% of Medicare spending, and 65% of Medicare beneficiaries have 3 or more chronic conditions; 23% have 5 or more. MCCs are often addressed in primary care, where time pressures force a focus on medication and lab results rather than self-management skills. Patients often struggle with treatment adherence and the emotional and physical burdens of self-management and health tracking. Chronic conditions reduce quality of life (QOL) and increase loneliness, which exacerbate those conditions. The primary purpose of this study is to investigate whether a voice-based platform is better for delivering an electronic health intervention to older adults than a text/typing-based platform. We have an evidence-based electronic health intervention (Elder Tree, ET) that has been shown to improve quality of life, physical and socio-emotional health outcomes for older adults with multiple chronic conditions when delivered via a text/typing-based system. The current project would test whether such patients would benefit even more if ET were delivered via a voice-based system (vs. the text-based system) because they would use it more consistently. ET is an existing intervention providing tools, motivation, and support on a computer platform to help older adults manage their health.

National Institute for Health and Care Research Global Health Research Centre for Multiple Long-Term Conditions

Multiple Long-Term Conditions (MLTC), defined as the coexistence of two or more chronic conditions, is increasingly prevalent in India. Despite this, the healthcare system remains largely focused on single-disease management, underscoring the urgent need for integrated, patient-centred approaches that are context-specific, equitable, and resource-sensitive. India's public health infrastructure is undergoing significant reform through the Ayushman Bharat Yojana, which aims to upgrade 150,000 sub-centres and primary health centres into Health and Wellness Centres (HWCs). These centres are designed to provide comprehensive care including prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation to underserved populations. This transformation presents a strategic opportunity to embed multi-morbidity care into the evolving system, supported by the establishment of a Global Health Research Centre dedicated to MLTC. The NIHR Global Health Research Centre for Multiple Long-Term Conditions aims to transform the health system in India and Nepal by improving care for individuals living with MLTC. With chronic conditions on the rise due to epidemiological transitions, particularly among adults aged ≥40, there is an urgent need for integrated, people-centred care models. This project is being implemented in Anakapalli district (Andhra Pradesh), Jodhpur (Rajasthan), Sonipat (Haryana) and Nepal, encompassing both rural and urban contexts. The study is conducted among adult patients with MLTCs attending rural primary providers (Medical officers and Staff Nurse) delivering services at these facilities in India and Nepal. The intervention comprises an electronic decision support system (EDSS) to facilitate evidence-based clinical decision-making, assisted telemedicine model to enable timely specialist consultations, and a patient-facing mobile application-supported by community champions and care coordinators to enhance care coordination, self-management, and treatment adherence. At this stage, we have completed the case-mix and health facility assessments, alongside the in-depth interviews to identify challenges faced by patients, caregivers, and health care providers. Currently, we are pilot testing the health intervention in 4 PHCs in India and 2 PHCs in Nepal among 180 participants (30 participants per site). Findings from this pilot will inform refinement of the intervention, study tools, and implementation strategies, and will provide critical evidence on contextual adaptability to support the design of a subsequent cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT). In the full RCT, we will evaluate the effectiveness of a health system intervention comprising an electronic clinical decision support system, assisted telemedicine, a patient-facing application, and community champions. The study will be conducted across selected sites in India and Nepal using a cluster randomized controlled design, in which Primary Health Centres (PHCs) are allocated to either the intervention or usual care arm. The intervention includes structured clinical workflows, a digital decision support system, assisted telemedicine, and patient-facing mobile health tools to strengthen continuity and coordination of care. Participants will engage with these components over a six-month implementation period. Data collection will include participant surveys and qualitative interviews, complemented by routine supervision checklists and system usage analytics to assess implementation processes and usability. The study findings will generate robust evidence to inform scalable and context-appropriate models of integrated care for multiple long-term conditions (MLTCs) in primary care settings in low- and middle-income countries. By embedding digital tools and strengthening PHC systems, the intervention aims to improve quality of life, reduce fragmentation of care, and establish a sustainable model for MLTC management.