Clinical Research Directory

Blast-related Regional Anaesthesia and Peripheral nerVe Injury Evaluation

This randomized study will examine whether ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia (a nerve block) contributes to new or worsening peripheral nerve problems after blast-related limb trauma. Blast injuries themselves can damage nerves, making it difficult to determine whether later numbness, weakness, or neuropathic pain is caused by the injury, surgery, or the nerve block. Adults with blast-related upper- or lower-limb trauma who need pain treatment will be randomly assigned to one of two standard pain-management strategies: regional anaesthesia plus multimodal analgesia, or multimodal systemic analgesia without a planned nerve block. All participants will receive appropriate rescue pain treatment if needed. Neurological function will be documented before treatment and reassessed during hospital care and follow-up. The main outcome is a new or worsened peripheral nerve deficit 30 days after treatment. The study will also assess pain relief, opioid use, function, neuropathic pain, and safety events up to 6 months.

Acute Post-Amputation Pain Management After Combat-Related Lower Limb Injury

Acute post-amputation pain remains a significant clinical challenge in patients with combat-related lower limb injuries and may negatively affect early rehabilitation, mobility, and opioid consumption. Various regional analgesia techniques and cryoanalgesia have been proposed to improve pain control; however, evidence regarding their feasibility and clinical utility in military trauma populations remains limited. The aim of this pilot study is to assess the feasibility of conducting a future randomized controlled trial evaluating different approaches to acute post-amputation pain management in patients with combat-related lower limb injuries. This prospective non-randomized pilot study will enroll 36 adult patients undergoing lower limb amputation or reamputation following combat-related trauma. Participants will be allocated to one of three groups according to clinical indications and multidisciplinary team decision: continuous peripheral nerve blocks, preoperative cryoablation, or standard multimodal analgesia. The primary outcomes will assess study feasibility, including recruitment rate, study completion rate, protocol adherence, and completeness of data collection. Secondary outcomes will include pain intensity assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), opioid consumption expressed as Morphine Milligram Equivalents (MME), early mobility assessed using the Basic Amputee Mobility Score (BAMS), time to first standing and ambulation, and treatment-related complications. Participants will be followed for 7 days after surgery, with an additional assessment at 1 month.

Comparative Evaluation of Intraneuroma and Perineuroma Botulinum Toxin Type A Injection Techniques for Chronic Neuroma Pain After Combat-Related Amputation

Patients with combat-related amputations frequently experience chronic neuroma pain that may interfere with rehabilitation, prosthesis use, mobility, sleep, and quality of life. Ultrasound-guided botulinum toxin type A injection has emerged as a potential treatment option for persistent neuroma pain; however, the optimal injection technique remains unclear. This prospective multicenter study aims to compare two ultrasound-guided botulinum toxin injection techniques for chronic neuroma pain after combat-related amputation: intraneuroma injection and perineuroma injection. Participants with ultrasound-confirmed painful neuromas will undergo one of the two injection approaches based on the treating physician's clinical decision and local practice. Pain intensity, neuropathic pain characteristics, phantom limb pain, prosthesis tolerance, functional outcomes, and adverse events will be evaluated during follow-up. The goal of the study is to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and potential clinical effectiveness of intraneuroma and perineuroma botulinum toxin type A injection techniques in patients with chronic neuroma pain following combat-related amputation.

BLOCK-TRAUMA Study

This prospective cohort study will evaluate the association between the overall burden of regional anesthesia and early clinical outcomes in adult patients with polytrauma. Patients with severe trauma often experience pain from multiple injury sites and may require more than one peripheral nerve block or continuous regional anesthesia catheter. While regional anesthesia can improve pain control and reduce opioid use, multiple blocks and catheters may also increase treatment complexity, local anesthetic exposure, motor weakness, and monitoring challenges. The study will prospectively collect data on the number and type of regional anesthesia procedures, local anesthetic exposure, catheter use, pain intensity, opioid consumption, mobility, complications, and early recovery outcomes. The goal is to determine whether increasing regional anesthesia burden is associated with improved analgesia, functional recovery, or increased risk in polytrauma patients.

DRONE-WOUND Study: Severe Infection After Drone-Related Combat Trauma

Drone-related combat injuries have become one of the most devastating mechanisms of injury in modern warfare. These injuries often cause extensive tissue devitalization, contamination, open fractures, vascular injuries, and complex soft tissue damage, which may substantially increase the risk of severe wound infection, multidrug-resistant bacterial infection, repeated surgical procedures, limb loss, and sepsis. However, the relationship between the extent of tissue devitalization and the development of severe infection has not been systematically investigated. The DRONE-WOUND Study is a prospective observational cohort study designed to evaluate the association between tissue devitalization and severe wound infection in patients with drone-related combat trauma. The study will collect detailed clinical, surgical, microbiological, and radiological data from injured patients treated at participating trauma centers. Measures of tissue injury, contamination, surgical management, microbiological findings, and infection outcomes will be analyzed to identify factors associated with severe infection and poor clinical outcomes. The findings of this study are expected to improve understanding of the mechanisms leading to infection after drone-related injuries, support early identification of high-risk patients, and inform future strategies for surgical management, antimicrobial therapy, and infection prevention in combat trauma. Ultimately, the study aims to improve limb salvage, reduce infectious complications, and enhance outcomes for patients with severe drone-related injuries.

Evacuation Time and Tourniquet Use as Risk Factors for PTSD in Combat-Related Amputation

This study aims to evaluate the relationship between evacuation time, tourniquet use, and the development of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in patients with combat-related amputations. In the context of modern warfare, prolonged evacuation times and extended tourniquet application may contribute not only to physical injury but also to psychological trauma. The study will prospectively follow patients over 18 months to identify key predictors of PTSD and to assess their interaction.