Clinical Research Directory

Comparison of Complication Rate, Functional Outcome and Quality of Life Between Standard Therapy Versus Fast-track Therapy in Patients Following Hip Replacement Surgery

The fast track group vs. control group will be compared with regard to hospitalization time and the non-inferiority of the fast track group vs. control group with regard to HOOS will be assessed. The questionnaires will only be collected in the study: Eq-5d-5l, HOOS, self-efficacy, enjoyment of movement, fear of movement, pain catastrophizing.

Comparison of the Restoration of Hip Biomechanical Parameters by CT Measurement Between the 3 Surgical Techniques: RSA/Minihip/THA - Hip Replacement: 3D Planning

The study will analyze hip biomechanical parameters using EOS radiographic measurements pre- and post-operatively (3 months) and post-operatively (3 months) CT scans after total hip replacement (THR), neck-preserving THR of the Minihip type or hip resurfacing (HR). Clinical results will be assessed at 3 months and 1 year after surgery. To this end, two types of examination are carried out, both of which are used in current practice: * Pre-operatively: EOS radiography * Post-operatively: EOS radiograph and CT scan Inclusion (m-3; m-1) : * Patient information at pre-operative visit * Non-opposition of patient, family member or legal guardian, if applicable * Questionnaires and clinical examination (standard management) * EOS during anesthetic consultation Follow-up visit (m+3): \- Post-operative follow-up consultation EOS and CT scan (1 week prior to visit) + questionnaire and clinical examination Follow-up visit (m+12): \- Post-operative check-up, questionnaire and clinical examination

Lumbar ESPB in Hip Replacement Surgery

In this study, continuous erector spinae plane block (ESPB) will be compared to continuous epidural analgesia in patients undergoing elective hip replacement surgery. Opioid consumption, pain severity, quadriceps femoris muscle strength, ability to walk, and quality of recovery will be evaluated. Moreover, chronic pain severity in months after the hospital discharge will be assessed.

10 Year Clinical Evaluation of Primoris Hip Component

Using the traditional and hitherto used uncemented hip prostheses achieved good clinical results, but one of the drawbacks is the risk of fracture in the femoral shaft in indbankning of the prosthesis (1-2%). In addition, the bone scan demonstrated that in the years after surgery dropped almost 30% of bone mass in the femoral shaft. This bone loss increases the risk that in the years after surgery, the increased risk of fractures around the prosthesis and in addition to impeding the described bone replacement prosthesis later. The newly developed prosthesis is anchored in the femoral neck and thus not involve the femoral shaft. This ensures a more physiological or normal weight transfer to the femur bone. This contributes to bone mass in long large extent preserved in the years after surgery, so you have a better opportunity later to make a new prosthesis surgery with good results. The new prosthesis should be capable of simultaneously reducing the incidence of thigh pain in the first year after surgery.'