Clinical Research Directory

Bioresorbable Sirolimus-eluting scaffold in de Novo Coronary Artery Lesions

Bioresorbable scaffold (BRS) was designed aiming to avoid the late adverse events associated with permanent metallic stents by providing temporary support to the vessel wall and promoting vessel remodeling, plaque reduction, and restoring vasomotion after its full absorption. As the first FDA-approved BRS, ABSORB BRS was associated with a significantly higher risk of late scaffold thrombosis compared with everolimus-eluting stent (EES). As a result, the ESC-EAPCI task force recommended that the current ABSORB BRS should not be preferred over conventional DES in clinical practice. To solve this dilemma, improved scaffold technology and optimal implantation techniques are necessary. The latest generation Firesorb BRS is a PLLA backbone scaffold system abluminally coated with poly(D, L-lactide) mixed with sirolimus using highly accurate and precise point spraying techniques. Compared to the ABSORB BRS, Firesorb features a thinner stent thickness (100-125 μm) while maintaining sufficient radial support, enabling faster degradation and a shorter duration of presence in the coronary. Additionally, inspired by the design of the Firehawk DES, its unique spot-coating process applies a single-sided coating layer exclusively to the stent's outer surface, enabling targeted drug release. Preclinical trials have demonstrated favorable performance for Firesorb, culminating in its approval by the National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) in 2024. Against these backgrounds, we have designed this trial to investigate whether the Firesorb BRS is non-inferior to the drug-eluting stent in terms of the Device-Oriented Composite Endpoint (DoCE) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for de novo lesions.

Randomised Trial of Dual Device Treatment Involving Drug-coated Balloon Angioplasty and Drug-eluting Stent Implantation Compared to Single Device Treatments in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus

Purpose of this study: The purpose of the study is to find out whether using a drug coated balloon in combination with a drug-eluting stent is better than the standard practice of using either device on its own. This study is specifically looking at patients with diabetes who have coronary artery disease. This means that their arteries become restricted or blocked, and these restrictions or blockages are called lesions. The study will look at diabetic patients undergoing treatment for lesions in segments of their coronary arteries that have not previously been treated with stents. These are called 'de novo' lesions. The treatment being investigated: In this study, we are comparing two devices, either used together or on their own to treat coronary artery disease. These devices are commercially available in Europe and carry the mark. This study is being carried out to compare the effectiveness of combining the two devices or using them individually: * Pantera® Lux® Paclitaxel Drug Coated Balloon, abbreviated Pantera® Lux® (DCB) A drug coated balloon is a balloon which is covered by an anti-proliferative drug. * Orsiro® biodegradable polymer Sirolimus Eluting Stent Orsiro® (DES) A stent is a short, wire mesh tube that acts like a scaffold to keep your artery open. A drug eluting stent is coated with medication that reduces the risk of the artery becoming blocked again. Both drug-eluting stents and drug-coated balloons are used routinely for the treatment of 'de novo' coronary artery disease in Europe. How will the study be carried out? This study is being conducted in 4 hospitals across Ireland. We aim to recruit 120 participants s in this study. If you agree to participate in this study and sign the informed consent form, you will be asked to participate in the screening process, which will determine if you meet the conditions to participate in the study. You will be "randomised" into one of the 3 study groups. Randomisation means that you are put into a group by chance (similarly to the roll of a dice). Neither you nor your doctor can choose the group you will be in. You will not know which group you were placed in until the end of the study. However, your doctor will know which study group you were placed in. * 40 patients will be treated with Pantera® Lux® (Drug Coated Balloon) only * 40 patients will be treated with Orsiro® (Drug Eluting Stent) only * 40 patients will be treated with a combination of both Pantera® Lux® (Drug Coated Balloon) and Orsiro® (Drug Eluting Stent). If you agree to participate in the study you will be invited to come back for a check-up angiogram 6 months after your procedure to make sure that the treatment has been a success. This is sometimes done in normal clinical practice, but it is not done routinely. You will not be charged for this additional test.

Bail-Out Stenting and Target-vessel Failure After Drug Coated Balloon Coronary percutaneouS Angioplasty for de Novo Lesions

The goal of this observational retrospective and prospective multicentric trial is to learn about the impact of bail-out stenting (BOS) after drug coated balloon (DCB) percutaneous coronary angioplasty (PCI) in de novo coronary stenosis.The main question to answer is: \- if BOS PCI leads to an higher rate of 1-year target vessel failure that DCB-only PCI. Participants will receive DCB PCI in de novo coronary stenosis. Treatments they\'ll be given should be: * DCB-only PCI * BOS PCI Researchers will compare DCB-only and BOS group to see if addictive stent implantation for DCB-PCI complication is relate to an higher rate of target vessel failure. Target vessel is the primary endpoint, defined as: * cardiovascular death * target vessel myocardial infarction * clinical driven target vessel revascularization * angiographic restenosis

Drug-Coated Balloon vs. Drug-Eluting Stent for Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Large Coronary Artery Disease

Prospective, randomised, open-label, international multicenter trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of drug-coated balloon (DCB) treatment compared to drug-eluting stenting (DES) in patients with large coronary artery disease.

STabilization of Atheroma by Lipid-reducing Effect of Drug-Coated Balloon (STABLE-DCB)

This study aims to investigate whether DCB angioplasty, compared to statin-based medical treatment alone, will lead to more reduction in plaque lipid burden as assessed by near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) at 6-9 months following the index procedure.

Paclitaxel-coated Balloon for Treatment of De-novo Non-complex Coronary Artery Lesions

The introduction of Bare-metal stents (BMS) since 1986 has alleviated the limitations of plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) related elastic recoil and flow-limiting dissections. Later on, higher restenosis rates due to exaggerated neointimal growth in BMS has led to the development of drug-eluting stents (DES), which elutes an antiproliferative drug to the vessel wall and reduce the restenosis rate. However, late stent thrombosis and restenosis, with a hazard of nearly 2% per year after implantation, remained a concern and motivated the development of drug-coated balloons (DCB). The advantages of DCB are that leaving no metal in the blood vessel and respect the vessel anatomy. Recently, studies with the strategy of DCB angioplasty with bailout stenting have demonstrated safety and efficacy for the small-vessel disease. In the BASKET-SMALL 2 trial, which compared SeQuent Please DCB with EES or Taxus DES in the vessels that have reference diameter\<3mm, showed that at 12-month follow-up, DCB was non-inferior to DES (MACE \[cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and target-vessel revascularisation\] rates: 8% vs. 9%). Although some small-scale RCT using surrogate endpoints have reported that no significant difference in MLD or late lumen loss between the two groups in large vessels, up to now, there is no large-scale RCT comparing the clinical outcomes of DCB versus DES in large vessels with de novo lesions. Therefore, the investigators hypothesized that in patients undergoing non-complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for de-novo stenoses, drug-coated balloon (DCB) is non-inferior to drug-eluting stents (DES).