Clinical Research Directory

Clinical Evaluation of a Hyperbolic Paraboloid Triple-Abutment on Morse Taper Dental Implants

This prospective clinical study aims to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of a novel triple-abutment system with hyperbolic paraboloid geometry installed on Morse taper dental implants. The system is designed to support three adjacent crowns on a single implant, aiming to optimize load distribution and preserve peri-implant tissue stability. Thirty systemically healthy adults missing three adjacent teeth will undergo implant placement, followed by a healing period of approximately three months for osseointegration prior to prosthetic loading. Metal-ceramic restorations will then be cemented over triple abutments. Clinical and radiographic evaluations will be performed at T1 (3-4 months after prosthetic loading) and T2 (12-18 months after prosthetic loading). The primary outcome will be marginal bone level change assessed by standardized periapical radiographs. Secondary outcomes include probing depth, bleeding on probing, plaque index, keratinized mucosa height, and patient-reported satisfaction. The study aims to investigate whether this innovative abutment design provides stable peri-implant conditions and favorable clinical performance when applied to Morse taper implants.

Additively Versus Subtractively Manufactured Implant Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses

This research is being done to evaluate the clinical, technical, biological, and aesthetic results of two different fabrication methods (additive and subtractive) for creating implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (iFDPs). Patients will receive an iFDP, meaning an implant-supported crown, according to regular treatment protocols. The fabrication method used to create the implant-supported crown will be decided in a randomised way. Clinical and radiological examinations will be performed prior to and when receiving the implant-supported crown and during a follow-up period of 3 years. Furthermore, technician- and patient-reported outcomes will be evaluated used questionnaires.

Accuracy of Standard and Geometric Pattern-Assisted Digital Scanning for Full-Arch Implant Prosthesis Frameworks

This clinical trial aims to compare three different impression techniques used to fabricate full-arch implant-supported dental prostheses. Accurate impressions are essential to ensure a passive and precise fit of the final prosthetic framework, which contributes to long-term implant success and patient comfort. In this crossover study, participants with four osseointegrated dental implants in the lower jaw will undergo three types of impressions: Conventional splinted impression using polyvinyl siloxane (PVS) material. Standard digital impression using an intraoral scanner. Geometric pattern-assisted digital impression, which incorporates a visual reference pattern to improve scan alignment and accuracy. Each participant will receive all three impression techniques in a randomized sequence, at different time points. The accuracy of each method will be assessed by evaluating the passivity of the resulting prosthetic frameworks using two methods: (1) digital superimposition analysis to measure three-dimensional (3D) spatial deviation, and (2) the clinical "one-screw test" to detect misfit. The study seeks to determine whether digital scanning, particularly with geometric pattern assistance, can provide accuracy comparable to or better than conventional methods. Findings may guide improvements in digital prosthodontic workflows and support more efficient, predictable treatment outcomes.

A Retrospective Data Collection on NobelProcera® Zirconia Implant Bridges from 4 to 14 Units.

This is a retrospective multicenter data collection in which clinical and radiographic data on implant zirconia bridges are collected from partially or fully edentulous subjects consecutively treated with at least one 4- to 14-unit NobelProcera® Zirconia Implant Bridge. This data collection will be conducted in up to 11 centers (see Appendix I) and will include between 150 to 200 subjects. The aim of this retrospective multicenter data collection is to evaluate the safety, performance, and clinical benefits of NobelProcera® Zirconia Implant Bridges (4 to 14 units) in daily dental practice.

Clinical Performance of All-on-4 PEEK and Conventional Prostheses

The all-on-4 treatment approach for completely edentulous mandible is a proven concept. However, there are still issues regarding the use of metal substructure to support the prostheses such as allergy, metallic taste, and aesthetic. Therefore, other materials such as polyetheretherketone (PEEK) are being tested for its suitability and is showing good potential. However, available evidence is limited regarding its clinical performance. Thus, the aim of this study is to compare clinical performance of all-on-4 treatment concept utilizing PEEK versus conventional metal framework as substructure in fully edentulous mandible. Thirty suitable patients will receive either PEEK or conventional all-on-4 prostheses for fully edentulous mandible. The prostheses will be retained by four implants utilizing the all-on-4 principle. Clinical performance will be assessed during the follow up period of up 3 years concerning screw loosening, material chipping or fracture, wear or staining, prosthesis survival and success, implant survival and success.