Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
2 clinical studies listed.
Filters:
Tundra lists 2 Digital Guided Bone Regeneration clinical trials. Each listing includes eligibility criteria, study locations, and direct links to research sites in the Tundra directory.
This data is also available as a public JSON API. AI systems and LLMs are encouraged to use it for structured queries.
NCT07526337
Digital Planning and Clinical Assessment of the Treated Atrophic Posterior Maxilla With a Sinus Lift Procedure: a Cross-sectional Study.
Maxillary posterior area is the most challenging site for dental implant placement. Indeed, complex remodeling processes, resulting in changes of the maxillary sinus and shape of the alveolar ridge will cause difficulties in rehabilitating the posterior maxillae sites. Various techniques have been proposed in order to achieve the necessary bone volume for the placement of long term successful implants. However, unbalanced crown to implant ratio remains a risk factor after successful dental implants installation following sinus graft. No study on humans assessed the effect of apical positioning of the implants in posterior grafted sites (sinus graft or sinus graft + vertical GBR) on the following clinical parameters: The peri-implant bone remodeling (vertical bone loss (mm) and probing depth (mm) around the implants, crown bulkiness, emergence profile and crown height, and Patients satisfaction, food impaction (PROM)). This study will elucidate these points and based on the parameter's results, suggest a treatment based classification facilitating the treatment decision-making of the clinicians in case of an atrophic posterior maxilla; aiming to ensure a long-term successful supra-implant rehabilitation which will maintain its bio-mechanically and biological success.
Gender: All
Ages: 18 Years - Any
Updated: 2026-04-13
1 state
NCT06620367
Guided Sausage Technique in Bone Regeneration As a Novel Digital Work Flow
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare amount of bone resorption and flap dehiscence following guided bone regeneration with or without digitally designed surgical guide. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does it differ in amount of bone resorption between the conventional and digital guided bone regeneration? * What is the difference between conventional and digital protocols regarding flap dehiscence following guided bone regeneration? Researchers will compare digital guided versus conventional technique to choose adequately which protocol to use. Participants will: * Receive guided bone regeneration around implant * Visit the clinic after 2,7,14 days for detection any signs of flap dehiscence * Bone gain and bone density will be assessed after 6 months
Gender: All
Ages: 35 Years - Any
Updated: 2024-10-01