Clinical Research Directory

Safety and Effectiveness of the Crystalline Sirolimus-Eluting Device in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease

This prospective, multicenter, post-market observational study aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the crystalline sirolimus-coated balloon (SeQuent® Sirolimus-Coated Balloon) for the treatment of coronary artery disease in routine clinical practice. Consecutive, unselected adult patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for de novo coronary lesions or in-stent restenosis will be enrolled. The primary objective is to assess target lesion failure at 12 months, defined as the composite of target vessel myocardial infarction or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization. Secondary objectives include angiographic procedural success, major adverse cardiovascular events, bleeding outcomes, and longer-term clinical results up to 36 months, as well as outcomes across predefined anatomical and clinical subgroups. The study seeks to answer whether treatment with the crystalline sirolimus-coated balloon provides a safe and effective revascularization strategy in a real-world population with diverse clinical presentations and lesion characteristics.

Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of the Long (> 150mm) Passeo-18 Lux Drug-coated Balloon of Teleflex in the Treatment of Subjects With Stenotic, Restenotic or Occlusive Lesions of the Femoropopliteal Artery

This clinical trial will evaluate the study device, Passeo®-18 Lux® paclitaxel-releasing percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) balloon catheter for the treatment of new or recurring cholesterol-related blockages in the arteries of the lower leg. The device that is used in this trial has been assessed in several previous studies for safety and effectiveness. The device is already approved for use in Europe. It has a "CE mark," which means it meets the European Union's safety, health and performance standards. This trial is being done to gather additional information on how well the device works and how safe it is when used in everyday medical care with specific attention to the longer lengths of the balloon, as it comes in different sizes.

Leave Nothing Behind Study Which Compares DCB With Bail Out BRS Versus BRS Strategy Alone

The goal of this study is to investigate the equivalence in early and long-term efficacy between the two "Leave nothing behind strategies" (Drug-Coated Baloon \[DCB\] strategy with bail-out BioResorbable Scaffold \[BRS\] versus BRS strategy) of de-novo native coronary artery lesions in a relatively young Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) population, to be more specific, Patients with Chronic Coronary Syndromes (CCS) and Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) (Non-ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction \[NSTEMI\] and Unstable angina) between 18-68 years of age scheduled for PCI. The main questions aim to answer are: DCB strategy with bail-out BRS implantation has equivalent clinical outcomes at 12 months compared to BRS strategy? DCB strategy with bail-out BRS implantation has noninferior angiographic in-segment net gain at 13 months compared to BRS strategy? DCB strategy with bail-out BRS implantation has equivalent clinical outcomes at 60 months compared to BRS strategy? Participants will be followed at: 1. st FU visit - 1 month (in hospital) 2. nd FU visit - 6 months (telephone) 3. rd FU visit - 365 days±15 days (telephone) - 1Y Primary efficacy endpoint 4. th FU visit - 395 days±15 days (in hospital) co-primary efficacy endpoint for the angiographic substudy 5. th FU visit - 730 days±30 days (telephone call) - 2Y 6. th FU visit - 1095 days±30 days (telephone call) - 3Y 7. th FU visit - 1460 days±30 days (telephone call) - 4Y 8. th FU visit- 1825 days±30 days (telephone call) - 5Y

Registry of Coronary Disease Outcomes Revascularizing With Drug-Coated Balloons

The primary aim of this registry is to systematically collect and analyze real-world data on all patients undergoing PCI with the Protégé paclitaxel-eluting DCB to evaluate procedural outcomes, long-term efficacy, and safety across various clinical indications. This registry aims to assess the clinical effectiveness of DCB therapy across diverse patient populations, including those with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) and acute coronary syndromes (ACS), as well as various lesion subsets, encompassing (but not limited to) in-stent restenosis (ISR), de novo coronary lesions, small vessel disease, bifurcation and calcified lesions, coronary bypass graft lesions, and patients at high risk of bleeding. Additionally, the study aims to identify predictors of success, complications, and optimal treatment strategies to further refine the use of DCBs.