Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
2 clinical studies listed.
Filters:
Tundra lists 2 Echocardiographic Software clinical trials. Each listing includes eligibility criteria, study locations, and direct links to research sites in the Tundra directory.
This data is also available as a public JSON API. AI systems and LLMs are encouraged to use it for structured queries.
NCT06832436
Atrial Strain in Septic Shock
Septic shock is a critical condition associated with high mortality. Transthoracic echocardiography is widely used to evaluate cardiac function and guide treatment. Left and right atrial strain (LAS and RAS) measured via speckle tracking echocardiography have shown prognostic value in cardiovascular diseases. However, differences exist between echocardiographic software, leading to challenges in result comparability. This study aims to compare LAS and RAS measurements between ECHOPAC and UWS software, evaluate AutoStrain technology, and assess reproducibility across observers. The study is non-interventional and will use retrospective echocardiographic data from patients treated for septic shock. The findings will contribute to improving measurement standardization in critically ill patients.
Gender: All
Ages: 18 Years - Any
Updated: 2026-01-16
NCT07229300
AI ECHO INSIGHT RCT for Automated Echo Reporting
The goal of this blinded randomized controlled trial is to assess whether AI-assisted TTE interpretation can improve cardiologist efficiency and reduce interpretation variability while preserving accuracy compared to current methods in adult patients whose historical echocardiogram images were performed. The main questions it aims to answer is to: 1. Assess overall transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) interpretation accuracy of an AI-assisted workflow compared to standard cardiologist-only and sonographer-assisted workflows to hypothesize if AI-assisted workflow for echocardiography interpretation is non-inferior in accuracy compared to standard workflows. 2. Evaluate cardiologist interpretation time using an AI-assisted workflow compared to standard cardiologist-only and sonographer-assisted workflows to determine if an AI-assisted workflow will result in a decrease in interpretation time compared to the cardiologist-only workflow. 3. To compare interpretation consistency and reliability compared to historical reports as well as consensus reports of all finalized cardiologist reports.
Gender: All
Ages: 18 Years - Any
Updated: 2025-11-14
1 state