Clinical Research Directory

SHAPE-ENDO: Multimodal Pre-Surgical Optimization in Patients With Obesity and Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer (Phase 1)

SHAPE-ENDO is a prospective, single-center, low-intervention, non-randomized, single-arm clinical trial conducted at Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge (Barcelona, Spain). The study is designed to evaluate a protocolized multimodal pre-surgical optimization strategy in women with severe obesity (BMI ≥40 kg/m²) and atypical endometrial hyperplasia/endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia or early-stage, low-risk endometrioid endometrial cancer. The strategy is intended for selected patients in whom immediate surgery may be associated with increased perioperative risk due to obesity and comorbidities. Participants will receive a structured multimodal optimization program aimed at improving metabolic and functional status while maintaining local oncologic control. The multimodal strategy includes authorized treatments used according to clinical indication, product labeling, current guidelines, and physician judgment: semaglutide/GLP-1 receptor agonist therapy for metabolic optimization, local hormonal treatment with a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device with or without oral progestins, structured nutritional intervention, adapted physical exercise, and scheduled clinical, imaging, and histological surveillance. The primary objective is to estimate the proportion of participants who achieve predefined pre-surgical optimization criteria after the multimodal strategy, including clinically relevant weight loss and/or reduction to BMI \<40 kg/m², absence of tumor progression, and acceptable anesthetic/surgical risk. Secondary outcomes include histological response, metabolic and anthropometric changes, treatment adherence, safety, health-related quality of life, feasibility of subsequent surgery, perioperative outcomes, and exploratory long-term survival outcomes. Participants will be followed during a 28-54 week optimization period. Long-term follow-up will assess recurrence, survival, quality of life, and metabolic outcomes. Exploratory adjusted comparisons may be performed against a historical cohort of patients with similar baseline characteristics previously treated at the same institution.

Observational Study of Women With Endometrial Cancer Who Receive the Standard Treatment for Their Disease

This study is being done to find out how often endometrial cancer recurs after the standard treatment as well as how often the standard treatment results in a lymphedema.

Sentinel Node Biopsy in Endometrial Cancer

Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynaecological cancer. Current treatment of EC typically includes removal of the uterus and to determine the extent of the disease (removal of fallopian tubes, ovaries \& if required a lymph node dissection (surgical staging)). While lymph node dissection may be valuable to guide the need for adjuvant treatment (chemo or radiotherapy) after surgery, it has been a topic of controversy for the last 30 years. In some patients it causes morbidity, specifically lymphoedema. This recently has been replaced with sentinel node biopsy (SNB). It requires an injection of a dye into the cervix with specific equipment \& surgical dissection of the lymph node in which the dye first becomes visible. Despite this promising proposition \& similar to a lymph node dissection, the value to patients, cost effectiveness \& potential harms (e.g. lymphedema) of SNB compared to no-node dissection in EC has never been established. Aim: determine the value of SNB for patients, the healthcare system and exclude detriment to patients using a randomised approach 1:1. Stage 1 - 444 patients. Stage 2 additional 316 patients. Primary Outcome Stage 1: Proportion of participants returning to usual daily activities at 12 months from surgery using the EQ-5D which will determine when women in both groups can return to their usual activities. Primary Outcome Stage 2: Treatment non-inferiority as evaluated by disease-free survival status at 4.5 years post-surgery, as measured by the time interval between the date of randomisation and date of first recurrence. Confirmation of recurrent disease will be ascertained through clinical assessment, radiological work-up and/or histological results.

Concurrent Laparoscopic Hysterectomy and Weight Loss Surgery in Obese Patients With Endometrial Carcinoma or Endometrial Intraepithelial Neoplasia

To assess the feasibility of an expedited referral process for the obese endometrial cancer or EIN patient from her gynecologic oncologist to the Brigham Center for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (CMBS) in order to undergo concurrent weight loss surgery and hysterectomy within 8 weeks of first appointment with a gynecologic oncologist (or 12 weeks for EIN patients).

Comparison of Two-Position and Four-Position Cervical Injection Techniques for Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in Endometrial Cancer Using Methylene Blue

This clinical trial evaluates lymph node mapping in newly diagnosed endometrial cancer patients undergoing surgery. The standard technique uses a 2-point methylene blue cervical injection. The study aims to determine if increasing injection points improves mapping success.

PROfiling Based Endometrial Cancer Adjuvant Therapy

This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized phase III trial among women with endometrioid adenocarcinoma with high-intermediate and intermediate risk features to investigate the role of integrated genomic-pathologic classification to determine if participants should receive no adjuvant therapy, vaginal brachytherapy, external beam radiotherapy or chemo-radiation therapy based on molecular features as compared to standard radiation therapy.

SATELLITE Study (feaSibility sAfeTy Efficacy dostarLimab earLy-stage defIcient endomeTrial cancEr)

The main goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate dostarlimab, an immunotherapy drug, as a potential alternative to surgery for early-stage endometrial cancer with Mismatch Repair deficiency, a genetic cause for 20-30% of cases. The study aims to establish dostarlimab's efficacy and safety in early-stage endometrial cancer, exploring its potential as a non surgical option for those unsuitable or unwilling to undergo major surgery, allowing for fertility preservation or addressing specific health conditions. Participants will have seven dostarlimab sessions over 12 months. The treatment plan involves four cycles every three weeks, followed by a three-week break, and then three cycles every six weeks. This research is a promising step toward a new, less invasive treatment choice for patients with specific genetic traits. It expands the range of care options for endometrial cancer.

Prospective Study for Endometrial Carcinoma and Hyperplasia in Childbearing-age Women

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effect and adverse side effects of membrane-inhibiting formula plus oral progestins as fertility-preserving treatment in patients with early-stage endometrial cancer and endometrial hyperplasia research questions：When taken with oral progestins, does the drug membrane-inhibiting formula shorten the time required for complete endometrial remission? What medical problems do participants have when taking drug membrane-inhibiting formula plus oral progestins? Efficacy, side effects, recurrence, pregnancy, and time to obtain pregnancy in different molecular classifications of POLE-mutated, mismatch repair-deficient(MMRd), p53 wild type(p53wt), and p53-abnormal(p53abn). Participants will: Take drug membrane-inhibiting formula plus oral progestins every day Visit the clinic once every 3 months for checkups, tests, and hysteroscopy Keep a diary of examination results and pathology

PORTEC-4a: Molecular Profile-based Versus Standard Adjuvant Radiotherapy in Endometrial Cancer

This is prospective, multicenter, randomised phase III trial among women with endometrial cancer with high-intermediate risk features to investigate the role of an integrated clinicopathological and molecular risk profile to determine if participants should receive no adjuvant therapy, vaginal brachytherapy or external beam radiotherapy based on a favourable, intermediate or unfavourable profile as compared to standard adjuvant vaginal brachytherapy.