Clinical Research Directory

EpiFaith Resident Learning Curve Trial

This study aims to evaluate the impact of the EpiFaith® syringe on the learning curve of anesthesia residents for the labor epidural technique. Anesthesia residents with prior experience placing \< 5 labor epidurals will be enrolled. Their performance of 20 sequential labor epidural placements with either standard technique with a beveled glass syringe or the EpiFaith® syringe will be observed. Successful epidural placement over time with sequential epidural placement attempts will be measured between groups. The primary outcome will be rate of successful epidural placement. Success will be defined as a composite of 4 criteria: maximum 3 attempts for placement; no need to re-site at a different level; no required intervention by the supervising attending anesthesiologist; and adequate analgesia with a visual analog score (VAS) \<3 at 30 minutes. We hypothesize that use of the EpiFaith® syringe will enable a faster learning curve for successful epidural placement. A cumulative sum chart (CUSUM) analysis will evaluate whether the EpiFaith® syringe causes deviation from the control learning curve. Secondary outcomes will include rate of inadvertent dural puncture and epidural replacement rate.

Impact of Ultrasound Guidance on Central Neuraxial Block Success in Patients With Non-Palpable Vertebral Anatomy

Patients scheduled to undergo general surgery with planned epidural catheter placement will be evaluated by comparing two different techniques routinely used in anesthesia practice for catheter insertion. A total of 60 patients aged 18-60 years, classified as ASA I-III, and scheduled to undergo general surgical procedures with epidural catheter placement at Sakarya University Faculty of Medicine Training and Research Hospital will be included in the study. All patients will be classified according to the following palpation scoring system to assess the difficulty of vertebral palpation: Palpation Score: All patients will be evaluated in the sitting position, and the difficulty of palpating vertebral landmarks will be scored between 0 and 3: 0: Spinous processes and interspinous spaces are clearly identifiable 1. Spinous processes are palpable, but interspinous spaces are not clearly identifiable 2. Spinous processes are not palpable, interspinous spaces are not identifiable, but the vertebral column can be palpated either on or off the midline 3. Spinous processes and interspinous spaces are not palpable, and vertebral structures are not clearly distinguishable Patients with a palpation score of 3 will be included in the study group. Patients with a score of 0 will be included as the control group. Patients will be divided into two groups: Anatomical Landmark Group and Ultrasound Group. In the Ultrasound Group, surface marking will be performed in the operating room using ultrasonography. In the Anatomical Landmark Group, after the patient is positioned sitting in the operating room, the insertion site will be estimated by palpation of anatomical landmarks. After determining the needle entry point in both groups, epidural catheterization will be performed under sterile conditions according to our routine practice. The two groups will be compared in terms of first-attempt success rate, total procedure time, number of needle redirections, and complications occurring during the procedure.

PIB for Post-operative Analgesia After Laparotomy : Determining the Optimum Dose

Pain control after surgery is a crucial component of postoperative recovery. Thus, in open abdominal surgery, the use of TEA (Thoracic epidural analgesia) has become a gold standard. However, analgesia may still remain a challenge, especially in patients with large incision abdominal incisions. To address this problem, the use of the PIEB (Programmed intermittent epidural bolus) mode has been proposed, because it offers a better spread of the epidural medication. Only a few studies have evaluated the superiority of this PIEB mode in open abdominal surgery, yielding conflicting results. However, PIEB showed to be at least as effective in controlling pain as CEI, and clinical experience shows that it can be a valuable tool, especially in patients with a large laparotomy incision. However, the optimal dosage of the PIEB mode has never been determined, Furthermore, it is known whether men and women have the same dosage needs to achieve adequate analgesia since most studies have failed to account for sex-based differences in postoperative analgesia. Hence, the main objective of this study will be to determine the optimal volume dose of the PIEB delivered at a fixed interval of 60 min in patients undergoing surgery using a large midline laparotomy incision. The optimal dose for male and female patients will be determined separately by evaluating men and women in two independent groups. We hypothesize that the optimal dose of the PIEB that will provide effective analgesia in 90% of patients on the first postoperative day will range between 5 and 10 mL, for both groups. The primary outcome in both groups is successful analgesia. It is defined as a requirement of 5 or less patient-controlled epidural boluses between 8 AM and 8 PM on the first postoperative day. Secondary outcomes will be the incidence of motor block and hypotension, comparison of the level of sensory block according to group, comparison of patient satisfaction according to group and comparison of Quality of Recovery-15 score at 48h post-op according to group.

Simulation-Based Training for Epidural Analgesia Placement

Epidural analgesia is the gold standard for labor pain management, widely recommended by the WHO and included in Italy's essential levels of care (LEA) since 2017. Despite its clinical benefits and high maternal satisfaction, the procedure remains technically challenging, particularly for anesthesia residents. In our institution, around 40% of laboring women request epidural analgesia. Successful epidural placement requires mastering a complex skillset. Recent studies highlight that simulation-based training significantly enhances learning for novice practitioners. This single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate whether a pre-rotation simulator-based training improves the success rate of epidural catheter placement among anesthesia residents. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the intervention group (simulation training plus anatomy lecture) or the control group (standard in vivo training only). The primary outcome is the number of successful catheter placements (defined as completed procedure without tutor intervention). Secondary outcomes include procedure time, complication rates, and satisfaction scores from the residents. The study will involve anesthesia residents in their 4th or 5th year rotating in the labor ward of the Azienda Ospedaliera di Padova. A sample size of 86 participants (43 per group) is required, and data collection will occur over three years.

Dexmedetomidine-esketamine-ropivacaine Versus Sufentanil-ropivacaine for Epidural Labor Analgesia

Sufentanil-ropivacaine combination is commonly used for epidural labor anesthesia, but is associated with some adverse events. Dexmedetomidine and esketamine, each has been effectively used for neuraxial anesthesia in combination with local anesthetics. Plenty of evidences show that both dexmedetomidine and esketamine, combined with ropivacaine, are also effective as the sufentanil-ropivacaine combination when used for epidural labor analgesia. This pilot trial is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the dexmedetomidine-esketamine-ropivacaine versus sufentanil-ropivacaine combination for epidural labor analgesia, and to test the feasibility of a future large randomized trial.

Intravenous Acetaminophen to Reduce Post-operative Opioid Consumption

Acetaminophen (Tylenol) is a commonly used medication after surgery to control pain. Tablets for oral use and suppositories for rectal use are the most frequently employed forms of acetaminophen after surgery. Intravenous (IV) acetaminophen is widely used in several countries but is not a standard medication for the adult population in Canada. It is mainly considered when it is impossible to take medication in tablet or suppository form. Opioids (Morphine, Hydromorphone, Oxycodone, etc.) are another class of medications commonly used after surgery for pain management. While they are generally very effective and stronger than acetaminophen or other pain relievers (e.g., ibuprofen/Advil), reducing their use is preferable, as they can cause various side effects such as nausea, dizziness, and dependence. IV acetaminophen may help control pain while also reducing opioid consumption. However, there are few high-quality scientific studies proving the benefits of IV acetaminophen compared to other forms, such as tablets or suppositories. Acetaminophen has been available in Canada for many years and has already been recommended for use in Quebec by the Institut national d'excellence en santé et services sociaux (INESSS) under certain conditions. This study aims to validate its benefits with clear data.