Clinical Research Directory

Botulinum Toxin Type A Versus Cross-Linked Hyaluronic Acid Filler Myomodulation for Non-Surgical Management of Excessive Gingival Display: A Randomized Controlled Trial

This randomized controlled trial compared the clinical efficacy and patient satisfaction of two non-surgical treatments for excessive gingival display (gummy smile): botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) and cross-linked hyaluronic acid (HA) filler myomodulation. Excessive gingival display is defined as exposure of 3 mm or more of gingival tissue during maximal smiling. It affects approximately 14% of women and 7% of men and is associated with reduced self-confidence, smile suppression in social settings, and impaired quality of life. When caused by hyperactivity of the upper lip elevator muscles, it can be treated without surgery using injectable therapies. Twenty patients (18 females, 2 males; age 18-45 years) with excessive gingival display greater than 3 mm were randomly allocated 1:1 to one of two groups. Group A (n=10) received bilateral injections of botulinum toxin type A (Refinex; 5 IU per side) at the Yonsei point. Group B (n=10) received cross-linked hyaluronic acid filler (Juvederm Voluma with lidocaine; 1.0 mL total) injected at six periosteal sites around the nose and upper lip using a myomodulation technique. Participants were assessed at baseline and at 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment. The primary outcome was maximum gingival display measured in millimeters using a calibrated periodontal probe. Secondary outcomes included patient satisfaction measured by Visual Analog Scale and a 12-item questionnaire, and adverse event monitoring. Both treatments produced equivalent gingival display reductions at one month (BTX-A: 69.6%; HA: 63.0%). At six months, the HA group maintained a statistically significant 26.4% improvement while the BTX-A group showed near-complete relapse. Despite this, BTX-A patients reported higher categorical satisfaction. Both treatments had excellent safety profiles.

Effect of Finishing Clear Aligner Marginal Termination Design (Supragingival vs Juxtagingival) on Aligner Color Stability After 14 Days of Wear: A Split-Mouth Study

* The goal of this clinical study is to learn whether the gumline edge design of a finishing orthodontic clear aligner affects how much the aligner's color changes after 14 days of wear. * The main question is: does a supragingival edge design - a straight edge covering about 2 mm of gum tissue - lead to a different amount of color change in the aligner compared with a juxtagingival edge design that follows the gumline exactly, after 14 days of wear? * Each participant wears finishing clear aligners with both edge designs at the same time - one design on the upper jaw and the other on the lower jaw - and serves as their own comparison (split-mouth). This within-person approach removes differences between individuals in oral hygiene, diet, and saliva. * The aligner's color over six selected teeth (three upper, three lower) is measured with a dental spectrophotometer (VITA Easyshade V) at placement (day 0) and after 14 days. Each measurement is repeated three times under standardized optical conditions. The amount of color change is expressed as a color-difference value (ΔE). * The study hypothesis is that marginal termination design (supragingival versus juxtagingival) is associated with a difference in the 14-day colorimetric change (ΔE00) of the finishing aligner. * The study is carried out during the finishing (refinement) stage of orthodontic treatment, when only small residual tooth movements remain, so that color changes can be attributed to wear and edge design rather than to tooth movement.