Clinical Research Directory

Pre-etched Bioactive Versus Resin- Based Fissure Sealant for Permanent Molars Affected With Molar Incisor Hypomineralization (MIH): a Randomized Clinical Trial

This study aims to evaluate and compare the clinical performance of pre-etched bioactive fissure sealants to conventional RBFS in permanent molars affected by MIH in terms of retention, marginal integrity, caries prevention effect, and sensitivity.

Evaluation of the Survival of Fissure Sealants Applied With Different Pretreatment Methods on Permanent First Molars: A One-Year Follow-Up

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the effect of two different pretreatment protocols-enamel deproteinization and bonding agent application-on the one-year survival of fissure sealants applied to permanent first molars in children. Background: Dental caries is a preventable yet highly prevalent multifactorial disease. Deep pits and fissures are particularly susceptible to caries development, especially in newly erupted molars. Although fissure sealants are considered one of the most effective preventive methods, their clinical success is largely dependent on long-term retention. Contamination of etched enamel surfaces with saliva or gingival fluid is a primary cause of sealant failure. To improve sealant adhesion, several pretreatment methods have been suggested, including bonding agents and enamel deproteinization. Methods: This randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial with a split-mouth design was conducted on healthy children aged 7-14 years. Each child contributed at least three permanent first molars to the study, randomly assigned to one of three groups: Group A - Acid etching + sealant; Group B - Acid etching + deproteinization + sealant; Group C - Acid etching + bonding agent + sealant. Clinical evaluations were performed at 3, 6, and 12 months using visual and tactile methods. Sealant retention, caries incidence, and marginal discoloration were recorded based on standardized criteria. Results \& Conclusion: This study seeks to clarify whether bonding agent or deproteinization pretreatment significantly improves sealant retention and reduces caries incidence compared to the conventional approach. Findings may contribute to defining the most effective clinical protocol for fissure sealant application, ultimately enhancing caries prevention and long-term treatment success in pediatric dental care.

The Effect of Different Deproteinizing Agents on the Clinical Success of Fissure Sealants in Primary Teeth

Investigation of the effect of deproteinization agents on the clinical success of non-invasive fissure sealant application, which is a non-invasive method used to prevent caries formation or to stop the progression of initial caries lesions limited to enamel on tooth surfaces thought to be at high risk of caries.

The Effect of Different Deproteinising Agents on the Clinical Success of Fissure Sealants in Permanent Teeth

Investigation of the effect of deproteinization agents on the clinical success of non-invasive fissure sealant application, which is a non-invasive method used to prevent caries formation or to stop the progression of initial caries lesions limited to enamel on tooth surfaces thought to be at high risk of caries.

CARIES ARREST USING SILVER DIAMINE FLUORIDE VERSUS FISSURE SEALANT in OCCLUSAL DENTAL CARIOUS LESIONS: RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to evaluate if Silver Diamine Fluoride (SDF) is a more conservative and effective treatment in preventing the progression of mild occlusal caries compared to fissure sealant in patients aged 20-45 years with incipient molar caries. The main question it aims to answer is: Is SDF more effective in arresting caries progression than fissure sealant? Does SDF prevent the formation of new caries compared to fissure sealant? Researchers will compare SDF treatment to fissure sealant application to see if SDF results in better caries arrest and fewer new carious lesions. Participants will: Be randomly assigned to receive either SDF or fissure sealant. Have follow-up assessments at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months for caries progression, arrest, and new caries formation. Undergo clinical evaluations using visual and tactile examinations to assess caries arrest and progression and using DIAGNOdent laser fluorescence system .

The Effect of an Adhesive System on the Retention and Caries Prevention for Fissure Sealants in Permanent Molars

Background: Resin-based fissure sealants (FS) are recommended to prevent pit-and-fissure caries development or prevent the progression of enamel caries lesion to frank cavitation into dentine. There is still limited clinical evidence on the use of adhesive system beneath fissure sealants in permanent molars and its effect on FS retention and caries progression. Aim: The aim of this randomised clinical trial is to evaluate the clinical efficacy of fissure sealants placed with and without prior use of an adhesive system in terms of retention and caries prevention in permanent molars over the period of 2 years. Study design: Children (6-12 years of age) with high caries risk that require sealants in their first permanent molars (ICDAS 0-3) will be selected at the Dublin Dental University Hospital (DDUH). Molars will be stratified according to presence of caries lesions (ICDAS 0 or ICDAS1-3) and randomly allocated according to the study groups (Test group: 17% phosphoric acid + adhesive system + FS; Control group: 17% phosphoric acid + FS). The randomisation unit will be the tooth and more than one tooth can be included per child. All children will be evaluated after 12 and 24 months by calibrated independent examiners. The primary outcome of the present trial is sealant retention over time. Clinical variables such as age, gender, tooth position (upper/lower), caries experience (DMFT/dmft), stage of eruption (erupted/partially erupted) and children's behavior (Frankl scale) will be collected.