Tundra Space

Tundra Space

Clinical Research Directory

Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.

5 clinical studies listed.

Filters:

Fluid Management

Tundra lists 5 Fluid Management clinical trials. Each listing includes eligibility criteria, study locations, and direct links to research sites in the Tundra directory.

This data is also available as a public JSON API. AI systems and LLMs are encouraged to use it for structured queries.

NOT YET RECRUITING

NCT07052461

Association of Microcirculation, Vexus Score and Femoral Vein Doppler in Patients on the ICU After Non-emergency Cardiac Surgery

The aim of the VeMic study is to explore if venous congestion is linked with microcirculatory impairment in elective cardiac surgery patients in the postoperative ICU stay.

Gender: All

Ages: 18 Years - Any

Updated: 2026-04-09

Microcirculatory Diffusion
Microcirculatory Convection Capacity
Venous Congestion
+3
RECRUITING

NCT07366164

Hemodynamic Optimization Using an Artificial Intelligenze System

This study will investigate the impact of using an automated fluid management system on intraoperative fluid therapy in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. The aim is to evaluate whether automated guidance can optimize hemodynamic stability and reduce the incidence of arterial hypotension,

Gender: All

Ages: 18 Years - Any

Updated: 2026-01-26

1 state

Hemodynamic (MAP) Stability
Fluid Management
RECRUITING

NCT07361952

Oral Versus Intravenous Fluid Therapy in the Emergency Department

The goal of this randomized clinical feasibility trial is to determine whether oral fluid therapy can achieve prescribed fluid volumes as effectively as intravenous fluid therapy in adult patients admitted to the emergency department who require fluid treatment. The main questions it aims to answer are: Are patients receiving oral fluids equally likely to achieve the prescribed fluid volume compared with patients receiving intravenous fluids? Is it feasible to conduct a randomized trial of oral versus intravenous fluid therapy in the emergency department, based on recruitment rate and protocol adherence? Researchers will compare oral tap water administration with standard intravenous crystalloid therapy to assess whether oral fluids are non-inferior in achieving prescribed fluid volumes and to evaluate feasibility outcomes. Participants will: Be randomized to receive either oral tap water or intravenous crystalloid fluids during their stay in the emergency department Receive a fluid volume and administration rate determined by the treating physician Be monitored according to standard clinical practice during the emergency department stay Have fluid intake, vital signs, and clinical outcomes recorded, with follow-up through routine health records up to 30 days after inclusion

Gender: All

Ages: 18 Years - Any

Updated: 2026-01-23

Fluid Management
RECRUITING

NCT07258875

Effect of VExUS Ultrasound Protocol (Venous Excess Ultrasound) on Perioperative Fluid Management, on the Incidence of Postoperative Pulmonary Complications and Postoperative Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Undergoing Thoracic Surgery

This study aims to investigate the effect of a VExUS ultrasound guided protocol of perioperative fluid management within a goal-directed therapy framework, on postoperative respiratory complications, and the occurrence of acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients undergoing thoracic surgery.

Gender: All

Ages: 18 Years - Any

Updated: 2025-12-02

1 state

Thoracic Surgery With One-lung Ventilation
VExUS
Fluid Management
+2
NOT YET RECRUITING

NCT06982001

ImPortance of Arterial Measurement Sites (IPAMS) on Intraoperative Hemodynamic Management

The goal of this clinical trial is to demonstrate the importance of arterial pressure measurement sites during major abdominal surgeries. This randomized controlled trial will compare arterial pressure measurements obtained from radial artery catheterization (the current standard method of monitoring) with those obtained from brachial artery catheterization (a more accurate reflection of central arterial pressure). At the end of the study, we are looking to answer the following questions: 1. Does arterial pressure measurement sites influence the amount of vasopressors that is administered during major abdominal surgeries? 2. What are the instances where there is a difference between peripheral (radial catheter) and central (brachial catheter) monitoring and what are the risk factors leading to the appearance of this radial-brachial pressure gradient? 3. With the data collected, can artificial intelligence based analysis help predict the reliability of a radial monitoring and help guide clinicians on choosing a peripheral versus central arterial pressure monitoring site? All adult participants who are scheduled for elective major abdominal surgeries and meeting our inclusion criteria will be approached and included if they consent. Participants will be randomized 1:1 in the intervention group and the standard of care group. In the intervention group, the brachial arterial line will be used intraoperatively to guide vasopressor and fluid administration. A radial line will also be installed to measure the radial arterial pressure simultaneously, but will not be used to guide hemodynamic management. In the standard of care group, both lines will be installed just like in the intervention group, however, it is the radial arterial line that will guide fluid and vasopressor administration. In both groups, the anesthesia protocol will be standardized and the anesthesiologist will be blinded to the arterial pressure measurement site.

Gender: All

Ages: 18 Years - 90 Years

Updated: 2025-05-21

1 state

Perioperative Care
Hemodynamics
Monitoring Blood Pressure
+6