Tundra Space

Tundra Space

Clinical Research Directory

Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.

2 clinical studies listed.

Filters:

Free Tissue Flaps

Tundra lists 2 Free Tissue Flaps clinical trials. Each listing includes eligibility criteria, study locations, and direct links to research sites in the Tundra directory.

This data is also available as a public JSON API. AI systems and LLMs are encouraged to use it for structured queries.

NOT YET RECRUITING

NCT07635420

Comparing Intraoperative Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging With Standard Clinical Assessment for Flap Perfusion in Head and Neck Reconstruction (VISION Trial)

This is a prospective multicentre randomised controlled trial evaluating whether intraoperative indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence angiography improves outcomes in head and neck free flap reconstruction compared with standard clinical assessment of flap perfusion. Adult patients undergoing microvascular free flap reconstruction for oncologic, trauma, or benign head and neck defects will be randomised to either intraoperative ICG angiography or conventional clinical perfusion assessment. The primary outcome is partial flap loss requiring intervention within 30 days after surgery. Secondary outcomes include total flap loss, flap-related re-exploration, flap salvage, and postoperative complications.

Gender: All

Ages: 18 Years - Any

Updated: 2026-06-09

Head and Neck Cancer (H&N)
Free Tissue Flaps
Free Flap
+5
RECRUITING

NCT07401641

Effect of Dezocine Versus Nalbuphine Combined With Sufentanil on Postoperative Analgesia, Complications, and Free Flap Survival in Patients Undergoing Oral Cancer Radical Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Background: Oral cancer radical surgery often requires free flap reconstruction. Postoperative pain is severe, and traditional opioids like sufentanil have side effects and may adversely affect tumor biology. Dezocine and nalbuphine are opioid agonist-antagonists with potentially better safety profiles. Their comparative effects on analgesia, complications, and flap survival in oral cancer surgery are unknown. Objective: To compare the efficacy of dezocine versus nalbuphine, both combined with sufentanil, for postoperative analgesia, and to evaluate their impact on postoperative complications and free flap survival/function in patients undergoing oral cancer radical surgery with flap reconstruction. Methods: This is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. Sixty eligible patients (aged 18-70, ASA I-III) will be randomly assigned (1:1) to receive postoperative patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) with either Sufentanil + Dezocine or Sufentanil + Nalbuphine. The primary outcome is pain intensity assessed by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 2, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes include flap survival status, sensory function recovery, incidence of adverse events (e.g., nausea, vomiting), and hospitalization duration. Potential Impact: This study may identify a superior postoperative analgesic regimen that provides effective pain relief while potentially improving flap outcomes and minimizing side effects for oral cancer patients.

Gender: All

Ages: 18 Years - 70 Years

Updated: 2026-02-10

1 state

Oral Cancer
Postoperative Pain Management
Free Tissue Flaps
+1