Clinical Research Directory

Effect of Dezocine Versus Nalbuphine Combined With Sufentanil on Postoperative Analgesia, Complications, and Free Flap Survival in Patients Undergoing Oral Cancer Radical Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Background: Oral cancer radical surgery often requires free flap reconstruction. Postoperative pain is severe, and traditional opioids like sufentanil have side effects and may adversely affect tumor biology. Dezocine and nalbuphine are opioid agonist-antagonists with potentially better safety profiles. Their comparative effects on analgesia, complications, and flap survival in oral cancer surgery are unknown. Objective: To compare the efficacy of dezocine versus nalbuphine, both combined with sufentanil, for postoperative analgesia, and to evaluate their impact on postoperative complications and free flap survival/function in patients undergoing oral cancer radical surgery with flap reconstruction. Methods: This is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. Sixty eligible patients (aged 18-70, ASA I-III) will be randomly assigned (1:1) to receive postoperative patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) with either Sufentanil + Dezocine or Sufentanil + Nalbuphine. The primary outcome is pain intensity assessed by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 2, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes include flap survival status, sensory function recovery, incidence of adverse events (e.g., nausea, vomiting), and hospitalization duration. Potential Impact: This study may identify a superior postoperative analgesic regimen that provides effective pain relief while potentially improving flap outcomes and minimizing side effects for oral cancer patients.