Clinical Research Directory

Efficacy and Safety of Contrast EUS-Guided Tissue Glue/Coil Devascularization vs. BRTO for Preventing Recurrent Gastric Variceal Bleeding

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effectiveness of EUS-guided tissue glue/coil injection and BRTO in preventing rebleeding of gastric varices (GVs) in patients with portal hypertension and GVs (including those with esophageal varices, ascites, or hepatic encephalopathy). The main questions it aims to answer are: Is the 1-year all-cause rebleeding rate of EUS-guided tissue glue/coil injection for GVs non-inferior to that of the BRTO group? Does EUS-guided tissue glue/coil injection differ from BRTO in the incidence of decompensated portal hypertension events (variceal bleeding, overt hepatic encephalopathy, ascites) and survival rate post-treatment? Researchers will compare patients randomized 1:1 to the EUS-guided tissue glue/coil injection arm vs. the BRTO arm to see if there are differences in rebleeding rates and complications. Participants will: Receive EUS-guided tissue glue/coil injection or BRTO. Take carvedilol long-term (if no contraindications) to reduce portal pressure. Undergo follow-up assessments at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months ±7 days.

Detachable Clip-assisted Endoscopic Cyanoacrylate Injection in the Treatment of Gastric Varices

A single-arm exploratory clinical study design was used to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a "modified sandwich injection" of tissue glue assisted by a detachable clip for the treatment of gastric varicose veins.

Preemptive TIPS for Gastric Variceal Bleeding in Patients With Cirrhosis

The prevalence of gastric varices is approximately 20%. It is important to note that gastric varices tend to bleed more severely, have a higher morbidity and mortality rate, and have a 35% to 90% risk of rebleeding after the cessation of acute hemorrhage. Because of the relatively low prevalence of gastric varices, the existing clinical studies have many deficiencies, and there is much controversy in the academic community, the optimal treatment and prevention strategies for gastric varices have not yet been fully defined. In the last few years, important advances have been made in the treatment and prevention of gastric variceal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis. Experts agree that the combination of pharmacological and endoscopic injection of tissue adhesives should be the first line of therapy in the acute bleeding episode from isolated gastric varices (IGV1) or type 2 gastroesophageal varices (GOV2) varices; whereas transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is considered a rescue therapy. TIPS has been shown to effectively prevent variceal rebleeding but with a potential increase in the incidence of hepatic encephalopathy and/or liver failure. In this sense, a recent randomized controlled trial (RCT) in fundal variceal bleeding showed that an early TIPS, performed during the first 5 days after patient admission resulted in a significant decrease in failure to control bleeding and early and late rebleeding. However, the study was conducted for 4 years and only included 25 patients. Due to insufficient sample size, it was unable to reflect whether priority TIPS can bring survival benefits to patients with gastric variceal bleeding. Therefore, there is an urgent need for multi-center clinical studies with large samples to provide high-quality evidence in the field of prioritizing TIPS for the treatment of acute gastric variceal bleeding. The present study aims to compare the preemptive TIPS (performed during the first 72 hours after endoscopy) with standard second prophylaxis (endoscopic injection of tissue adhesives plus carvedilol) for patients with acute bleeding from gastric varices (IGV1 or GOV2). The primary outcome will be a 6-week mortality from inclusion.