Clinical Research Directory

A Long-term Follow-up Study in Participants Who Received CTX001

This is a multi-site, open- label rollover study to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of CTX001 in pediatric and adult participants who received CTX001 in parent studies 111 (NCT03655678) 141 (NCT05356195) or 161 (NCT05477563) (transfusion-dependent β-thalassemia \[TDT\] studies) or Study 121 (NCT03745287) or 151 (NCT05329649) or 161(NCT05477563) (severe sickle cell disease \[SCD\] studies).

Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of a Single Dose of CTX001 in Participants With Transfusion-Dependent β-Thalassemia and Severe Sickle Cell Disease

This is a single-dose, open-label study in participants with transfusion-dependent β-thalassemia (TDT) or severe sickle cell disease (SCD). The study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of autologous CRISPR-Cas9 modified CD34+ human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (hHSPCs) using CTX001.

Health Economic Evaluation of Non-Invasive Prenatal Exclusion Diagnosis

Since the discovery of a small fraction of circulating cell-free fetal DNA (ccffDNA) in the blood of the mother, non-invasive prenatal diagnosis (NIPD) techniques using a simple blood sample have been developed to 1) screen for chromosomal abnormalities, 2) diagnose fetal sex, and 3) detect variants not carried by the mother (exclusion NIPD by PCR). Exclusion NIPD by PCR is currently available for certain common variants, but developing it for each variant takes 3-6 weeks per center. The development process for PCR NIPD is lengthy and costly for each variant tested, thereby restricting access to this technique. In practice, this technique is not widely available to couples at risk of transmitting a severe monogenic disease in France, due to the large number of different genes and multiple variants of a given gene. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is based on the simultaneous, parallel execution of millions of sequencing reactions, enabling the same nucleotide sequence to be sequenced hundreds of times. It provides qualitative information on the nature of the sequenced base, as well as quantitative information on the number of times the base has been sequenced (reads). Although it only allows for the analysis of around 2% of the entire genome, NGS sequencing of the exome corresponds to almost all the exons of the 22,000 or so genes in our genome. However, this generates a large amount of data, leading to additional costs. Since its widespread adoption by diagnostic laboratories, some teams have developed an NGS-based NIPD for the exclusion of a pathogenic variant. It allows the analysis of multiple pathogenic variants without requiring an additional development phase. They have demonstrated that NGS-based NIPD is a robust and reliable technology, but one that incurs additional reagent costs. In France, 1,700 to 1,800 prenatal diagnostic tests (PND) for monogenic diseases are performed each year due to family history. Between 35 and 40% of couples undergoing invasive PND could benefit from NIPD by NGS, as proposed in the PrenatSafe project. The increased availability of NIPD, whether by PCR or NGS, could also affect couples' demand in the long term. In France, the introduction of NIPD by NGS is likely to lead to an increase in requests for NIPD, as many couples with a low risk of recurrence (in the case of de novo mutations) will probably opt for it due to its lack of iatrogenicity. The rapid and widespread rise of NIPD by NGS, made possible by the use of a standardized, generalizable technique such as NGS, will transform our practices throughout the country. The PrenatSafe project therefore aims to evaluate the cost/benefit ratio of NIPD by NGS compared to the current standard procedure: NIPD by PCR when performed in clinical practice or PND by invasive sampling (trophoblast biopsy or amniocentesis), using an automated, standardized NGS technique involving exome sequencing, which covers almost all indications for exclusion NIPD. This project is the first cost-consequence analysis of prospective exome-based NIPD, using a single standardized technique. The aim is to translate this innovative technology into routine practice if it proves beneficial and economically viable. Exome-based NIPD for exclusion can be fully automated, from ccfDNA extraction to sequencing. This reduces the risk of human error and brings turnaround times in line with the requirements of prenatal diagnosis. If successful, exome-based NIPD would become an earlier alternative to invasive PND without increasing the risk of fetal loss. It would be available for a very large number of indications and could easily be transferred to other prenatal diagnosis centers in France.

Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy of CTX001 in Pediatric Participants With Transfusion-Dependent β-Thalassemia (TDT)

This is a single-dose, open-label study in pediatric participants with TDT. The study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of autologous CRISPR-Cas9 modified CD34+ human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (hHSPCs) (CTX001).

Prenatal Transplantation for Fetuses With Fanconi Anemia

The investigators aim to evaluate the safety and efficacy of in utero hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (IUHSCT) for the treatment of fetuses diagnosed with Fanconi anemia (FA) during pregnancy.

A Study to Learn About the Safety and Efficacy of the Drug Oleogel-S10 in Japanese Patients With Epidermolysis Bullosa

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if Oleogel-S10 gel works to treat skin wounds from two types of inherited epidermolysis bullosa (EB): junctional EB (JEB) or dystrophic EB (DEB) in the Japanese population. Children and adults may participate. The trial also looks at the safety of Oleogel-S10 gel. The main questions it will answer are: * Does Oleogel-S10 gel close wounds from JEB or DEB within 45 days or reduce the size of the wounds? * Are there any medical problems when using Oleogel-S10 gel? * How much of the drug ends up in your blood? The study has 2 parts. In Part 1, participants will: * Apply Oleogel-S10 gel to the EB wound dressings at least once every 4 days for 45 days. * Visit the clinic once every 2 weeks for checkups and tests. If participants complete Part 1, they may participate in Part 2 if they choose to. In Part 2, participants will continue to receive Oleogel-S10 gel until the product is available to buy in Japan or until the trial is stopped by the company.

A Study of Deramiocel (CAP-1002) in Ambulatory and Non-Ambulatory Patients With Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy

HOPE-3 is a two cohort, Phase 3, multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of a cell therapy called deramiocel (CAP-1002) in study participants with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) and impaired skeletal muscle function. Non-ambulatory and ambulatory boys and young men who meet eligibility criteria will be randomly assigned to receive either deramiocel or placebo every 3 months for a total of 4 doses during the first 12 months of the study. All participants will be eligible to receive 4 doses of deramiocel for an additional 12 months as part of an open-label extended assessment period. After completion of the first open-label extension (Months 12-24), subjects who have completed Month 24 are eligible to continue onto a Long-Term Open-Label Extension period that will provide treatment with deramiocel until commercial availability, or until sponsor's decision to terminate the trial, or the participant withdraws consent.

Effect of Large Neutral Amino Acids in Adults With Classical Phenylketonuria

The overall aim of this study is to evaluate LNAA treatment as a potential alternative to conventional dietary treatment for PKU. This study investigates the effects of LNAA treatment compared to the classic dietary treatment on cerebral dopamine synthesis in patients with classic PKU. We will assess LNAAs effectiveness on neurotransmitter synthesis, cognitive function, mental health, and safety, compared to the standard diet.

Evaluating Prenatal Exome Sequencing Study

This study evaluates the impact of the various outcomes of pES (definitive diagnosis, probable diagnosis and IF) on clinical decision making and on parental psychological wellbeing, compared between different analysis strategies to investigate the clinical utility, defined as the balance between potential harms and benefits.