Clinical Research Directory

Comparison of Er-YAG Laser, Air Polishing, and Surgical Excision for Gingival Hyperpigmentation

This randomized controlled clinical trial aimed to compare the effectiveness of different treatment approaches for physiologic gingival hyperpigmentation. Participants with gingival melanin pigmentation were randomly assigned to one of four treatment groups: Er:YAG laser treatment, air polishing with erythritol powder, air polishing with sodium bicarbonate powder, or conventional surgical excision. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using pigmentation index scores, digital image analysis, and color measurements at baseline and follow-up visits. Patient-centered outcomes, including postoperative discomfort and satisfaction, were also assessed. The study sought to determine whether air polishing techniques could provide clinical outcomes comparable to conventional treatment approaches while improving patient comfort and satisfaction.

Vitamin C for Gingival Depigmentation

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical and histopathological efficacy of topical vitamin C applications using three modalities (topical gel, microneedling , and mesotherapy) in gingival depigmentation. Assessment includes clinical evaluation, CIELAB analysis via DOPI, and histopathological examination (Fontana-Masson staining).

Clinical Effectiveness Of Polishing Brush Compared To Ceramic Soft Tissue Trimming Bur In Gingival Depigmentation

Gingival hyperpigmentation, particularly of melanin origin, can pose significant aesthetic concerns, especially among patients with a high smile line. Several depigmentation techniques have been proposed to manage this condition, including scalpel surgery, electrosurgery, cryotherapy, lasers, and various rotary instruments. Recently, minimally invasive rotary tools such as ceramic burs and polishing brushes have gained interest due to their potential to deliver controlled ablation with reduced postoperative discomfort and healing complications. Ceramic soft tissue trimming burs are specially designed to remove superficial pigmented gingival layers with minimal trauma. However, these instruments may still generate heat and cause a degree of tissue damage. On the other hand, polishing brushes, traditionally used for surface finishing and stain removal, have recently been explored for soft tissue applications due to their gentle action and adaptability. Despite their increasing use, there is insufficient comparative clinical evidence on the efficacy, healing outcomes, and patient-centered experiences between these two modalities in gingival depigmentation. A split-mouth randomized controlled trial design offers the advantage of eliminating inter-individual variability. Thus, this study aims to assess and compare the clinical effectiveness of the polishing brush and ceramic trimming bur for gingival depigmentation in terms of pigment reduction, healing outcomes, postoperative pain, and recurrence.