Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
5 clinical studies listed.
Filters:
Tundra lists 5 Glabellar Frown Lines clinical trials. Each listing includes eligibility criteria, study locations, and direct links to research sites in the Tundra directory.
This data is also available as a public JSON API. AI systems and LLMs are encouraged to use it for structured queries.
NCT06448676
Head-to-Head Comparison of All Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A Products for Glabellar Rhytides
Study Type: This is a multicenter, triple-blind, randomized controlled trial. Purpose: The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effectiveness and safety of all commercially available Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A (BoNT-A) products for treating glabellar rhytides, commonly known as frown lines. This study is designed to provide comprehensive data on how these treatments compare in terms of improving frown lines and the duration of their effects. Main Questions the Study Aims to Answer: Which BoNT-A product provides the longest lasting effect on reducing glabellar rhytides? How do these products compare in terms of safety and the occurrence of side effects? Participant Tasks: Women aged 18 years or older with moderate to severe glabellar lines will participate. Participants will receive injections of a BoNT-A product into specific facial muscles. They will need to take weekly photographs using their smartphones to document changes in their frown lines. These photos will be securely sent to our research team for analysis. Participants will complete questionnaires at the start and end of the study to assess their satisfaction, quality of life, and any changes in their condition. Comparison Group: Researchers will compare participants receiving different types of BoNT-A products to see which one is more effective at reducing frown lines and maintaining these effects over time. The safety profiles of these products will also be compared to determine which has the fewest and least severe side effects. This study aims to fill important gaps in our understanding of Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A treatments, guiding more effective clinical decisions and improving patient outcomes.
Gender: FEMALE
Ages: 18 Years - Any
Updated: 2026-07-02
NCT05481931
Non Interventional Safety Study of NUCEIVA for the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Glabellar Lines
Non-interventional PASS of NUCEIVA for the treatment of moderate-to-severe glabellar lines to provide additional characterisation of the long-term safety of NUCEIVA in the real-world clinical practice setting.
Gender: All
Ages: 18 Years - 64 Years
Updated: 2026-06-30
NCT06585696
A Phase 3 Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Botulinum Toxin Type A for Injection (CU-20101)
This is a Phase 3 clinical study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of single/repeated injections of CU-20101 in the treatment of moderate to severe glabellar lines. The study consisted of a 7-day screening period, Study Part 1 (randomized double-blind controlled study) and Period 2 (open-label study). Part I was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, single-injection, active-drug parallel-controlled, non-inferiority design clinical study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of CU-20101 in the treatment of moderate to severe glabellar stria compared with a single injection of Botox®; part 2 was an open-label study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of repeated injections of CU-20101 in the treatment of moderate to severe glabellar lines.
Gender: All
Ages: 18 Years - 65 Years
Updated: 2026-06-15
1 state
NCT05148000
Assess Aesthetic Improvement With QM1114-DP in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Lateral Canthal Lines and Glabellar Lines
This study to assess aesthetic improvement following treatment with QM1114-DP.
Gender: All
Ages: 18 Years - Any
Updated: 2026-05-29
1 state
NCT05766683
Depth of Botulinum Neurotoxin Injection for Treatment of Glabellar Lines
STUDY QUESTION: Does the depth of injection of onabotulinumtoxinA neurotoxin in the glabellar complex affect efficacy of the BoTN for the improvement of glabellar frown lines? STUDY AIM * Primary objective: Compare the efficacy of onabotulinumtoxinA neurotoxin injected at the depth of 2mm vs 4mm for the improvement of glabellar lines * Secondary objective: Determine any adverse effects of onabotulinumtoxinA neurotoxin injected at the depth of 2mm vs 4mm RATIONALE FOR THE PROJECT: Although the use of BoTN for treatment of glabellar lines has long been established as safe and effective, the optimal depth of injection has not been established. Our project hopes to establish the optimal depth of injection for onabotulinumtoxinA neurotoxin for maximal improvement of glabellar lines with minimal adverse effects
Gender: All
Ages: 18 Years - Any
Updated: 2026-03-12
1 state