Clinical Research Directory

Comparison of RIMA-SVG and Ao-SVG Techniques in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

This randomized, double-blind, single-center clinical trial was divided into two groups, RIMA-SVG and Ao-SVG, according to the surgical method. The purpose was to evaluate the effect of the RIMA-SVG surgical method in improving saphenous vein graft (SVG) patency and reducing clinical complications. A total of 300 patients will be enrolled and randomly assigned to two surgical method groups: RIMA-SVG Group (150 patients): SVGs are connected to the right internal mammary artery (RIMA). Ao-SVG Group (150 patients): The aorta is clamped, and SVGs are connected to the ascending aorta (Ao).All patients will undergo CABG on a beating heart with sequential vein grafts to bypass at least two or more coronary vessels. The primary outcome is 1-year graft patency. The secondary outcomes include neurological complications, mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and surgical site infection event.

Total Arterial vs. Mixed Grafting in Left Coronary CABG

This is a prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled trial comparing the clinical efficacy of total arterial grafting (internal thoracic artery and radial artery) versus conventional mixed grafting (internal thoracic artery and great saphenous vein) in the left coronary artery system during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). A total of 400 patients undergoing elective CABG at the Second Hospital of Jilin University will be enrolled and randomized into two groups. The primary endpoint is graft patency at 12 months postoperatively, evaluated by coronary angiography or CT angiography. Secondary outcomes include perioperative complications, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and long-term clinical prognosis. The study aims to provide evidence-based guidance on optimal graft selection in CABG.