Clinical Research Directory

Shuganhuazhuo Formula for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Damp-Heat Syndrome

Primary liver cancer is a malignant tumor with a very poor prognosis. Hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) accounts for approximately 80% of cases. Under the current targeted and immunotherapy-based treatment approaches, the overall survival of patients with advanced HCC has improved significantly compared to targeted therapy alone. However, there are still limitations in therapeutic effectiveness. In addition to the tumor burden, liver reserve function is associated with the prognosis of HCC. Cirrhosis, tumor burden, and anti-tumor treatment can all lead to damage to liver reserve function, which in turn leads to a decrease in patient survival. Currently, there are no specific treatments for deteriorating liver reserve function; only symptomatic treatments such as reducing transaminase levels, bilirubin levels, and blood ammonia levels, as well as diuretics, are available. The indocyanine green(ICG) clearance test allows for precise, dynamic, and quantitative measurement of liver clearance function, making it a commonly used method for assessing liver reserve function in clinical practice.Previous studies have confirmed that its test results are closely related to the prognosis of HCC. Shuganhuazhuo Formula(SHF) is a Chinese herbal medicine used to treat advanced HCC with syndrome of Damp-Heat and Blood stasis. It can inhibit necrosis in the livers of mice in experimental models, reduce fibrosis scores, and demonstrate potential therapeutic effects in protecting the liver, reducing oxidative stress, and preventing fibrosis. This study is an open-label randomized controlled trial. Patients with advanced HCC who are receiving second-line or third-line anti-tumor treatment are randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the control group or the traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) group. The control group receives anti-tumor treatment as recommended by guidelines, while the TCM group receives additional treatment with SHF. SHF involves decocting traditional Chinese medicine ingredients twice daily. Each time, 150 ml of the decoction is prepared and taken orally half an hour after breakfast and dinner. Treatment lasts for 6 months. During this period, the ICG clearance test is performed every 2 months to assess liver reserve function, and quality of life is also evaluated. After the treatment period, follow-ups on survival and safety are conducted every 3 months. This study aims to evaluate the benefits of the SHF in terms of liver reserve function, overall survival, and quality of life in patients with HCC of the syndrome of Damp-Heat and Blood stasis. It also includes exploratory analyses of differences in biomarker expression during treatment.

Iparomlimab and Tuvonralimab With Lenvatinib, Radiotherapy, and HAIC for Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus

The purpose of this study is to learn how well a combination of iparomlimab and tuvonralimab (QL1706), lenvatinib, radiotherapy, and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) works and how safe it is for people with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) that has grown into the portal vein, forming a portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT). Participants will receive iparomlimab and tuvonralimab together with lenvatinib, radiotherapy directed at the portal vein tumor thrombus, and HAIC, which delivers chemotherapy directly through the hepatic artery. Researchers will evaluate how long the cancer remains controlled without getting worse, how much the tumors shrink, how long participants survive, and whether the treatment makes surgery possible for some participants. Treatment-related side effects will also be assessed. The study will also explore whether features in tumor tissue and blood are associated with treatment response and may help identify patients who are more likely to benefit from this treatment strategy.

Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Combination Therapy With SYS6090 Injection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

This is an open-label, multicenter Phase Ib/II clinical study designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of combination therapy with SYS6090 Injection in participants with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

A Study of Neoadjuvant Tislelizumab Plus Lenvatinib in Resectable HCC at High Risk of Recurrence

This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled, phase 3 study to explore the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant tislelizumab plus lenvatinib in patients with resectable HCC at high risk of recurrence.

Intelligence System for Predicting Atezolizumab-Bevacizumab Response and Clinical Outcomes in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

This study is a multicenter retrospective clinical research, led by the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, and jointly conducted by other sub-centers. The aim is to develop an non-invasive artificial intelligence system for predicting the response and clinical outcomes of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) to the treatment with atezolizumab combined with bevacizumab (T+A). In response to the clinical situation where approximately half of uHCC patients do not respond to the standard T+A therapy and traditional invasive biopsy is unable to fully reflect the heterogeneity of the tumor microenvironment, this study plans to retrospectively collect the data of 400 patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria from January 2020 to November 2025. The study will systematically summarize multi-dimensional data such as enhanced CT images within one month before treatment, baseline characteristics, serum markers, liver disease factors, and tumor stage. By integrating these clinical features with deep learning imageomics features extracted from images, the research team is dedicated to constructing and validating a safe, non-invasive, and reproducible prediction model, with the aim of achieving precise identification of the benefit population before implementing immunotherapy combined with anti-angiogenic treatment, and providing a powerful intelligent tool support for optimizing clinical treatment decisions and improving patient survival prognosis.

A Phase IIa, Single-arm, Open-label Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and PK of CVM-1118 in Combination With Sintilimab and TACE in Participants With Incurable/Non-metastatic HCC

This is a single-arm, open-label Phase IIa study designed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and PK of CVM-1118 in combination with Sintilimab (Tyvyt ®) and TACE in participants with incurable/non-metastatic HCC. Approximately 40 participants will be enrolled, all receiving CVM-1118 (200 mg orally \[PO\], twice daily \[BID\]) in combination with Sintilimab (200 mg via intravenous \[IV\] infusion every 3 weeks \[Q3W\]) and TACE. All participants will initiate treatment with CVM-1118 and Sintilimab on Cycle 1 Day 1 (C1D1), with each cycle lasting 21 days, continuing until the occurrence of unacceptable toxicity, disease progression, death, consent withdrawal, for 2 years (i.e., Cycle 34) or study termination (whichever occurs first). CVM-1118 will be temporarily suspended from 2 days prior to each TACE procedure until 7 days post-TACE. The protocol permits conventional TACE (cTACE) or drug-eluting beads TACE (DEB-TACE) based on investigator's discretion, with the requirement that each participant maintains the same TACE modality throughout the treatment period. The first TACE procedure will be initiated between weeks 2-4 (C1D15 - C2D8) following systemic therapy initiation, with a maximum of 2 TACE treatments per lesion, an interval of ≥1 month between TACE sessions, and no more than 4 TACE treatments in total per participant. The study comprises four periods: screening, treatment, safety follow-up, and survival follow-up. During the screening period, participants will undergo required examinations and evaluations. Eligible participants will enter the treatment period to receive the combination regimen. Tumor response will be assessed per RECIST v1.1 and mRECIST (see Appendix 1), with evaluations conducted every 9 weeks (±1 week) following initial dosing. During the safety follow-up period, all participants will undergo final safety assessments 28 days (+7 days) after investigational product cessation or prior to initiating new antitumor therapy. Subsequently, participants will enter the survival follow-up period with 12-week interval contacts to document disease status, anti-tumor therapies received, survival status, and other relevant clinical information until death, loss to follow-up, consent withdrawal, or study closure (whichever occurs first). Throughout the study, participants will undergo scheduled safety evaluations and PK blood sampling at designated timepoints. Subsequent PK sampling schedules may be adjusted or eliminated based on accumulated pharmacokinetic data from preceding participants. * CVM 1118 will be administered at 200 mg, PO, BID. Treatment continues until unacceptable toxicity, disease progression, death, consent withdrawal, for 2 years (i.e., Cycle 34), or study termination (whichever occurs first). CVM-1118 will be temporarily suspended from 2 days prior to each TACE procedure until 7 days post-TACE. CVM-1118 should be swallowed whole with a glass of water in a fasted state, with no food intake for at least 2 hours before and 1 hour after CVM 1118 administration. CVM 1118 should be administered at approximately the same time each day. Investigators are permitted to adjust the dosing for participants as required by referring to the "Dose Adjustment". * Sintilimab will be administered at 200 mg, IV, Q3W. Treatment continues until unacceptable toxicity, disease progression, death, consent withdrawal, for 2 years (i.e., Cycle 34) or study termination (whichever occurs first). Investigators are permitted to adjust the drug administration regimen for participants as required by referring to the "Dose Adjustment". * TACE modality for each participant, including the choice between cTACE and DEB-TACE, will be determined by investigators at their discretion; however, each participant must remain consistent with the selected TACE modality (cTACE or DEB-TACE) throughout the treatment period. The first TACE procedure will be initiated 2-4 weeks after the start of systemic therapy (C1D15 to C2D8), with a maximum of 2 treatments per lesion (minimum 1-month interval between TACE sessions) and up to 4 treatments per participant in total.

A Study of IMM2510 + IMM27M Combination Therapy in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

This is a Phase 2, open-label, multicenter,study designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary antitumor activity of IMM2510(Anti-PD-L1 and VEGF trap recombinant - Page 1 of 5 - protein) combine with IMM27M(Anti-CTLA-4 Humanized monoclonal antibody) in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma who not have received the treatment for aHCC in past

SBRT Plus QL1706 as Second-Line Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

This is a prospective, single-arm, single-center exploratory clinical study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) combined with QL1706 in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who have received one prior line of systemic therapy and experienced radiographic disease progression or intolerance. Eligible patients will receive SBRT to all evaluable intrahepatic lesions at a total dose of 25-50 Gy delivered in 5 fractions. Within 7-14 days after completion of SBRT, patients will receive QL1706 at 7.5 mg/kg by intravenous infusion every 3 weeks. Treatment with QL1706 will continue until confirmed disease progression, intolerable toxicity, patient request to withdraw, withdrawal of informed consent, or other protocol-defined treatment discontinuation criteria, whichever occurs first. The primary endpoint is objective response rate assessed by the investigator according to modified RECIST criteria. Secondary endpoints include local control rate of SBRT target lesions, progression-free survival, overall survival, disease control rate, and the incidence of adverse events and serious adverse events. Exploratory endpoints include dynamic changes in serum tumor biomarkers and immune-related indicators, as well as their association with clinical outcomes. A total of 36 patients are planned for enrollment.

Eparlitozoviril as Adjuvant Therapy for Resectable HCC With MVI

Tumor recurrence is the leading cause of death and a major bottleneck for long-term survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Therefore, there is an urgent clinical need for effective postoperative adjuvant therapies to reduce postoperative recurrence and improve long-term survival, especially for HCC patients with high-risk factors. However, no standard adjuvant treatment regimen has been established so far, and domestic and international guidelines have not reached a consensus on relevant recommendations. It is generally recognized that postoperative antiviral therapy with nucleoside analogues and interferon yields definite benefits for patients with HBV- or HCV-related HCC, particularly those in Asian populations. Some interventions have been proven ineffective. For instance, the majority of studies have demonstrated that postoperative chemotherapy fails to bring survival benefits and may even lead to worse prognosis in HCC patients. Besides, multiple treatment modalities including transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), radiotherapy, targeted therapy and immunotherapy are still under investigation. MVI has been well documented as a strong high-risk factor for postoperative recurrence of HCC. The presence of MVI indicates the capacity of tumor cells for local invasion and distant metastasis. According to the number and location of microscopic tumor foci observed under pathological microscopy, MVI is classified into three grades: (1) M0: No microscopic tumor foci detected; (2) M1: No more than 5 microscopic foci within 1 cm adjacent to the primary tumor; (3) M2: More than 5 microscopic foci or foci located beyond 1 cm from the primary tumor. A retrospective study from Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University enrolled 661 HCC patients who developed recurrence within 5 years after curative resection, and reported that the rate of MVI positivity was 31.6% among these recurrent cases. Another retrospective study conducted at Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital of Shanghai involving 496 HCC patients showed that patients with MVI had significantly lower recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with those without MVI. A series of studies have been carried out to explore postoperative adjuvant treatments for resectable HCC patients complicated with MVI. A phase III randomized controlled trial conducted by Wei et al. revealed that for patients with single resectable HCC (tumor ≥ 5 cm) combined with MVI, postoperative adjuvant TACE (1 to 2 cycles) achieved a median disease-free survival (DFS) of 17.45 months (95% CI: 11.99-29.14), versus 9.27 months (95% CI: 6.05-13.70) in the active surveillance group (HR=0.70, p=0.020). In addition, Li et al. evaluated the efficacy of postoperative adjuvant FOLFOX-based hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) in resectable HCC patients with MVI. The results demonstrated that adjuvant HAIC could significantly prolong DFS, with a median DFS of 20.3 months versus 10.0 months (p=0.001). Collectively, active postoperative intervention is clinically meaningful for resectable HCC patients with MVI. In recent years, tumor immunotherapy represented by immune checkpoint inhibitors, including antibodies against programmed death-1 (PD-1), programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4), has gradually become a key therapeutic strategy for malignancies. Tumor cells can inhibit T cell activity and evade immune surveillance by expressing immune checkpoint ligands. Blockade of these immune checkpoints can enhance the proliferation, survival and cytotoxicity of T cells, thereby exerting anti-tumor effects. Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies have exhibited favorable efficacy in a variety of solid tumors. Given the high postoperative recurrence risk of resectable HCC with MVI and the lack of consensus on standard adjuvant regimens, as well as the proven efficacy of PD-1 monoclonal antibodies and HAIC in this setting in previous randomized controlled trials, we designed a prospective, single-center, open-label, phase II cohort study. This study aims to preliminarily evaluate the efficacy and safety of eparlitozoviril (dual PD-1/CTLA-4 immunotherapy), compared with active surveillance, in resectable HCC patients with MVI. The findings of this study may provide evidence for the optimization of postoperative adjuvant treatment for HCC.

A Multicenter Prospective Study on the Performance of Spectral CT for Evaluating Treatment Response After TACE in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

By comparing the diagnostic accuracy of spectral CT and conventional CT in evaluating treatment response efficacy after TACE, this study aims to investigate the diagnostic performance of spectral CT in assessing treatment response following TACE for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Prospective Evaluation of a Locked Risk-Stratified Surveillance Strategy for Extrahepatic Metastasis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

This is a multicenter prospective observational cohort study in adults with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) without baseline extrahepatic metastasis who are receiving routine clinical management and follow-up at participating centers. The study evaluates the real-world implementation and clinical utility of a locked machine learning-guided risk stratification strategy for predicting lung and bone metastasis and supporting risk-stratified surveillance. The locked strategy uses prespecified 12-month risk thresholds and linked care pathways and is implemented without retraining or threshold revision. No study-mandated treatment or surveillance assignment is performed; clinical care remains at physician discretion according to local practice. The study assesses model transportability and calibration, implementation outcomes (including completion of prespecified actions, timeliness of action, and treatment activation), clinically actionable detection outcomes, patient-important outcomes, and longer-term survival. Comparative analyses use centre- and calendar-epoch-aligned usual-care episodes as the primary observational comparator.

Efficacy and Safety of SIRT-Y90 in Combination With Atezo + Bev for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

This study adopted a bidirectional cohort study design. On the one hand, the previous clinical data, treatment exposure and clinical endpoint events of the enrolled patients were retrospectively collected. On the other hand, prospective regular follow-up was conducted from the date of enrollment to continuously observe long-term recurrence, progression and survival outcomes, and analyze the correlation between related factors and prognosis. The primary objective of this study was to describe the efficacy and safety of SIRT-Y90 in combination with atezolizumab and bevacizumab in adult patients with unresectable HCC in China. Medical records from approximately eight sites in China will be used.

Defining the Ablative Dose for Y-90 TARE

This study is being done to help doctors improve how they treat liver tumors that cannot be removed by surgery or treated with standard ablation techniques. The researchers want to find out the best amount of radiation that needs to be delivered to completely destroy (or ablate) parts of the liver that have cancer.

Universal CAR-T Cells (REVO-UWD-03) for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Lung Cancer

This is an investigator initiated trial to assess the efficacy and safety of a GPC3-targeting CAR-T therapy (REVO-UWD-03) in the HCC and Lung Cancer. It also aims to explore the feasibility of using a novel universal CAR-T cell platform.

Ipilimumab N01 Combined With Sintilimab, Bevacizumab Biosimilar, and Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy as Conversion Therapy for Unresectable Intermediate-Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Conversion therapy for unresectable intermediate-advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) has evolved from systemic therapy to combined local-systemic approaches, but current regimens still have limited surgical conversion rates. This prospective, single-arm phase II study evaluates a combination regimen of PD-1 inhibitor (sintilimab) plus CTLA-4 inhibitor (ipilimumab N01), bevacizumab biosimilar, and HAIC for patients with initially unresectable intermediate-advanced HCC. The primary goal is to achieve a higher surgical conversion rate with manageable safety

Durvalumab/Tremelimumab in Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Setting in Patients With HCC Treated by by Percutaneous Ablation Procedure

This project is a Phase 2 trial testing the safety and efficacy of treatment with Durvalumab/Tremelimumab in neoadjuvant and Durvalumab in adjuvant setting in patients with BCLC A HCC treated by by percutaneous ablation (PA) procedure in a curative intent. DUMELEP is a Multicentre, Phase 2 trial Eligible patients will receive consecutively: 1. 1 Durvalumab 1500 mg/Tremelimumab 300 mg infusion in a neoadjuvant setting 2. percutaneous ablation procedure in a curative attempt at Day 30 3. 11 monthly Durvalumab 1500 mg infusions. 4. Classical follow-up during an additional year (every 3 months)

Neoadjuvant Tislelizumab-Lenvatinib vs Surgery Alone in Stage Ia HCC With Narrow Margin

Postoperative recurrence remains a major limitation to long-term survival in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In addition, a narrow surgical margin is widely regarded as a risk factor for recurrence. Neoadjuvant therapy may represent a strategy to reduce the risk of recurrence, thereby improving long-term outcomes. Tislelizumab plus lenvatinib has demonstrated promising efficacy with manageable safety in advanced HCC. Therefore, we will conduct a phase II study to compare neoadjuvant tislelizumab plus lenvatinib followed by surgery versus surgery alone in patients with stage IA HCC and an anticipated narrow surgical margin.

A Prospective, Single-Arm, Exploratory Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Treatment With QL1706, an Anti-PD-1/Anti-CTLA-4 Bispecific Antibody, in Resectable Stage IB and IIA Hepatocellular Carcinoma With High Recurrence Risk

This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant therapy with Iparomlimab and Tuvonralimab Injection (anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 antibody combination) in patients with resectable hepatocellular carcinoma at high risk of recurrence (Stage IB, Stage IIA).

Impact of Radiotherapy on ctDNA in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Radiotherapy is increasingly being used in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) as a standalone treatment, or in combination with systemic therapy. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) causes cell death directly (via double-stranded breaks) and indirectly (via vascular bed damage or promotion of antitumour immunity). Unfortunately, the effect of cell death is not immediate and takes time. As a result, the typical arterial phase hyperenhancement on imaging may persist up to 12 months after radiotherapy, and it is not necessarily suggestive of presence of viable tumours. Therefore, there is no consensus on ideal timing of response assessment following radiotherapy to HCC. Therefore, a blood-based biomarker which can be done frequently and monitored dynamically, could be preferred for response assessment after radiotherapy. Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) is an emerging and promising biomarker in cancer management, which has been shown useful in cancer screening, guiding treatment, and informing prognosis. Currently, most of the clinical applications of ctDNA revolve around either the presence of ctDNA, or the genomic changes associated with these molecules. Biological properties of ctDNA such as fragment length, jaggedness of fragments, or epigenetic changes may provide additional information related to the tumour characteristics and its sensitivity to anti-cancer treatments. These biological properties of ctDNA are relatively unexplored in the context of radiotherapy. It is unknown whether these properties can be utilized for monitoring treatment response. We therefore propose to study the biological properties of ctDNA in relation to HCC patients undergoing radiotherapy.

Lenvatinib and Pembrolizumab With or Without BCAA in Unresectable HCC

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether adding branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs) to lenvatinib and pembrolizumab improves treatment outcomes in adults with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The study will also evaluate the safety of this combination treatment. The main questions this study aims to answer are: Does the addition of BCAAs improve the time patients live without their cancer getting worse? Does the combination treatment improve tumor response compared with standard treatment alone? What medical problems or side effects do participants experience during treatment? Researchers will compare lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab with BCAAs to lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab alone to see whether adding BCAAs provides additional benefit for patients with unresectable HCC. Participants will: Be randomly assigned to receive lenvatinib and pembrolizumab with or without oral BCAAs Take lenvatinib by mouth every day and receive pembrolizumab by intravenous infusion every 3 weeks Continue treatment until disease progression, unacceptable side effects, or withdrawal from the study Visit the clinic regularly for physical examinations, imaging tests, blood tests, and safety assessments

Surgery vs. Watch-and-Wait Strategy in Complete Responders for Hepatocellular Carcinoma (SWITCH)

The "Surgery versus Maintenance after Conversion-therapy-achieved Complete/Partial Response in Hepatocellular Carcinoma (SWITCH)" study is a multicenter, open-label, prospective non-randomized cohort study with the protocol number SWITCH-01 (Version 0.1, dated October 5, 2025). Sponsored by West China Hospital of Sichuan University and led by Principal Investigator Wu Hong, the study involves 10 participating centers and has completed NCT registration. Its core objective is to evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of two management strategies-surgical resection and maintenance therapy-in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who have achieved complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) after conversion therapy and are deemed eligible for curative liver resection (R0) by a multidisciplinary team (MDT). The study is designed to address the clinical dilemma of optimal management for initially unresectable HCC patients who attain favorable responses to conversion therapy, providing high-level evidence for clinical decision-making.

A Phase 1 Study of TGI-5 as Monotherapy and in Combination With Nivolumab in Subjects With Locally Advanced/Metastatic Solid Tumors

This is a Phase 1, multicenter, open-label, two-parts, FIH study to evaluate the tolerability, safety, PK/PD, and preliminary antitumor activity of TGI-5 as monotherapy and in combination with Nivolumab in subjects with unresectable locally advanced/metastatic solid tumors. The study consists of two parts: TGI-5 monotherapy (Phase 1a: including a dose escalation part and a dose expansion part), TGI-5 in combination with a fixed dose of Nivolumab (Phase 1b: including a dose escalation part and a dose expansion part).

Efficacy and Safety of Radiotherapy Combined With Tislelizumab and Anlotinib in the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Complicated With Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus

For HCC patients with PVTT who the researchers believe can benefit from radiotherapy combined with tislelizumab and anlotinib, informed consent forms will be signed, and then they will receive the study treatment and be followed up. The research design is as follows: First, radiotherapy was administered. Three days ±1 day after the start of radiotherapy, tislelizumab and anlotinib treatment were initiated. Each cycle was three weeks, and the treatment continued until no toxicity was acceptable or clinical benefits were lost (evaluated by the researcher based on imaging, biochemical indicators, and the patient's clinical status).

Needle-based Percutaneous Ablation of Liver Tumors.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if INT001 can ablate liver tumors in adults in an outpatient setting. It will also help us learn about the safety of INT001. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Using a needle under image guidance, the liver tumor is accessed and INT001 is injected. Upon injection into tumor, does INT001 ablate/kill the tumor entirely? 2. What medical problems do participants experience when receiving INT001? Participants will: Receive INT001 on day 1. Visit the clinic day 7, 30 and 90. Receive lab tests during each visit and MRI on day 30 and 90.