Clinical Research Directory

Comparison of 177Lu-PSMA-617 and 225Ac-PSMA-617

There is evidence that Actinium-225 Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (225Ac-PSMA) has a potentially higher level of efficacy than 177 Lutetium Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (177Lu-PSMA) as a radioligand therapy. This single center, pilot study will compare differences in the mechanisms of actinium-225 and lutetium-177 radioligand therapies (RLT) in participants with high or very high risk localized or locoregional prostate cancer planning on undergoing a prostatectomy.

Neoadjuvant ADT + Darolutamide With Pembrolizumab, Followed by Adjuvant Pembrolizumab in Molecularly Stratified High-Risk Prostate Cancer

This is a single-arm, phase II study of neoadjuvant combination therapy of Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT), \[Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH) agonist Leuprolide\], androgen receptor (AR)-antagonist Darolutamide and Pembrolizumab in a stratified high-risk localized prostate cancer cohort, followed by adjuvant treatment with Pembrolizumab (12 cycles) post-radical prostatectomy (RP). Patients with National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) high-risk non-metastatic prostate cancer (localized or locally advanced) (defined as Gleason ≥8, disease stage \>=cT3a, or PSA l \>20 ng/mL) will be risk-stratified at a biopsy using Decipher, a commercial standard-of-care diagnostic assay. Patients satisfying all three criteria of high-risk genomic characteristics listed below as per the Decipher grid results will be enrolled in the study: 1. Decipher Genomic classifier, GC\>0.6 2. AR activity score/AR-output gene signature (ARoS)\>11.0 3. High Luminal B score/ PAM50 subtype signature

COMBINED PSMA-PET/CT AND MRI STAGING IN INTERMEDIATE AND HIGH-RISK PATIENTS PROSTATA-CANCER (COMBINE-P)

This retrospective, multicentre comparative analysis aims to evaluate a new staging method for i) improved detection of intraprostatic index lesions, ii) local T-staging and iii) lymph node (LN) staging in men with clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) at intermediate/high risk by combining prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) imaging using different tracers ((18)F) DCFPyL, Gallium-68, Fluor-18) and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) who subsequently underwent radical prostatectomy (RP). Another secondary endpoint will be the additional value of PSMA-PET/CT in men with unremarkable MRI. Men at intermediate risk (PSA \> 10 ng/ml to 20 ng/ml or Gleason score 7 or cT category 2b) or high risk (PSA \> 20 ng/ml or Gleason score ≥ 8 or cT category 2c) who underwent PSMA-PET/CT and mpMRI followed by RP will be analysed in three different subgroups corresponding to the modalities i) PSMA-PET/CT with 18-F-DCFPyL (subgroup/arm A), ii) Gallium-68 PSMA-PET/CT (subgroup/arm B) and Fluorine-18 PSMA-PET/CT (subgroup/arm C). The validation of the accuracy of the detection of intraprostatic index lesions, local and lymph node staging by MRI and PSMA-PET-CT with different tracers is carried out using the histological radical prostatectomy specimens. In addition, the prediction of the International Society of Urolgenital Pathology (ISUP) graduation group (GG) within intraprostatic index lesions will be determined using the SUV (standardised uptake value) in PSMA-PET-CT and using ADC values (Apparent Diffusion Coefficient of the diffusion-weighted MRI sequence) in MRI (7,8). The ability of PSMA-PET-CT to predict extraprostatic, i.e. capsule-transcending, tumour growth is also analysed in comparison with MRI. In addition, the correlation of tumour localisation (right vs. left) in relation to positive lymph nodes (right vs. left) is analysed. Finally, the added value of PSMAPET-CT in the case of negative, unsuspicious MRI is determined. Overall, our analysis aims to improve patient care by analysing the potential of non-invasive "digital biopsy" in terms of lesion detection and prediction of the histological grading group. In addition, a proof-of-concept for personalised lymph node dissection based on prediction of lymph node metastasis and patient-tailored nerve sparing with accurate prediction of extracapsular extension will be tested based on combined preoperative PSMA-PET and MRI imaging. The results of these two analyses will have a direct impact on clinical practice and the further use of highly specialised imaging. In addition, this multi-centre data analysis will provide the European Prostate Cancer Center of Excellence (EPCCE) group with a proof-of-concept for future projects.

A Platform Study of Epigenetic Therapy Before Prostatectomy in Men With Prostate Cancer

This is an open-label, non-randomized, exploratory platform protocol designed to assess the safety and antitumor activity of epigenetic therapies in participants with localized prostate cancer who are undergoing radical prostatectomy. The epigenetic therapy is intended to increase the sensitivity of the underlying tumor to the patient's immune system. The platform study will evaluate safety, biomarkers, and clinical activity of an epigenetic therapy. The particular details relevant to each module within this platform study will be provided as appendices to the core protocol.

Delayed Pelvic Imaging With [68]Ga-PSMA PET/CT in a Patient With High-risk Prostate Cancer.

Recent evidence suggests that both standard-time and delayed-time \[⁶⁸Ga\]Ga-PSMA PET acquisitions can reveal clinically relevant findings, and neither phase should be excluded a priori in routine practice. This study evaluates a streamlined dual-phase protocol consisting of: * A standard whole-body PET/CT acquisition performed 60 minutes after radiotracer administration. * A delayed pelvic PET-only acquisition performed 90 minutes post-injection, reconstructed using the attenuation-correction CT (CT/AC) obtained from the initial whole-body scan. Because the prostate gland and pelvic lymph nodes exhibit minimal physiological mobility, accurate PET-CT anatomical correspondence can be maintained through careful patient repositioning, without repeating the CT scan. The main advantage of this protocol is a reduction in patient radiation exposure, as the delayed phase does not require a second CT scan. It also reduces in-department time and maintains diagnostic quality of PET interpretation, provided that the PET-CT alignment remains acceptable. This method may additionally enhance workflow efficiency in the Nuclear Medicine Unit by allowing early identification-based on predefined clinical parameters-of patients most likely to benefit from delayed pelvic imaging.

Immunotherapy With N 803, ETBX-071, and M-CENK in Combination With Radiation for Participants With High-Risk Prostate Cancer.

This study tests a new treatment for men with high-risk prostate cancer who can't have surgery. The treatment combines three experimental drugs and radiation therapy. Researchers will track how well the treatment works and how safe it is. The study will last about five years.

Immunotherapy Before and After Surgery

This Phase 2 clinical trial is testing a new immunotherapy combination (N-803, ETBX-071, M-CENK) for men with high-risk prostate cancer before and after prostate surgery. The goal is to see if this treatment improves cancer outcomes and is safe.

FK-PC101 as Adjuvant Therapy for Men With High-Risk Prostate Cancer

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if the vaccine FK-PC101 works to delay or prevent the return of prostate cancer in men who have had surgery to remove their prostate cancer. It will also learn about the safety of FK-PC101. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does FK-PC101 delay or prevent the return of prostate cancer following surgery? What medical problems do participants (subjects) have when taking FK-PC101? Researchers will compare FK-PC101 to current treatment practice to see if FK-PC101 works to prevent or delay the return of prostate cancer following surgery to remove the prostate cancer tumor. Subjects will: Have a sample of the prostate cancer tissue collected at the time of surgery to remove this tissue from the body. This tissue will then be used to create a personalized vaccine that is specific to your prostate cancer. If randomly selected to receive the vaccine, subjects will receive the vaccine up to 7 times over a 6-month period. In addition to the treatment visits for those randomized to receive FK-PC101, there will be up to 4 follow up visits to the clinic over a 22-month (nearly 2 year) period. For subjects randomized to receive current treatment practice, they will be asked to attend up to 8 visits over 22 months to track if there is any detectable cancer. Should their prostate cancer return within a year following surgery, they will be eligible to receive FK-PC101, which already had been produced and thus no additional tumor tissue would need to be obtained. Subjects in both study arms will have regular blood tests and scans to test whether their prostate cancer has returned.