Clinical Research Directory

Adapting Rehabilitation Delivery for Maximum Impact at Home-2 (ReDI-2)

People who live in rural areas and have hip or knee arthritis can have difficulty receiving physical therapy (PT) close to home. Living with hip or knee arthritis can make doing daily activities and being physically active difficult. This can lead to other health conditions, such as becoming overweight, or lessen enjoyment of life. We will compare 2 programs that allow physical therapists to treat rural residents in their own home to each other and to usual care. Usual care is the care that is typically provided to people living with hip or knee arthritis. For the first 12 weeks, participants will continue usual osteoarthritis (OA) care and then complete the standardized questionnaires again. Then, they will be randomized to either Individual (IPT) or Group-based PT (GPT). Over 12-weeks, therapists will meet virtually with patients using Zoom so that patients and therapists can see each other. The program will be either a class or one-on-one with a therapist. In the class, participants will still receive private one-to-one time with the therapist using a Zoom 'breakout' room. Therapists in both groups will help patients do exercises correctly in their home. Patients can also see and talk to the therapists to discuss their challenges in living with OA and set personalized goals including pain management, participating in valued daily activities, keeping healthy (diet, sleep) and being active. Both programs will allow patients who sometimes cannot access physical therapy to receive care in their home.

Assessing the Time-Course of Dexmedetomidine-Induced Analgesia Via EEG

Objective: To investigate the temporal dynamics of dexmedetomidine's analgesic effects in the brain using EEG. Methods: Eligible patients scheduled for total hip arthroplasty under intrathecal anesthesia received a continuous infusion of DEX at 1.5 μg/(kg·h) for 15 minutes before neuraxial puncture, followed by an additional 15-minute infusion. The study was divided into three phases: Phase 1: Non-dosing phase (Baseline). Phase 2: DEX preemptive analgesia phase (DEX infusion). Phase 3: DEX cessation phase (Post-infusion). Outcomes: Primary safety outcome: EEG spectral analysis at different phases. Secondary outcomes: NRS scores, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), dizziness, agitation, and time to intestinal exhaust within 48 hours. Intraoperative hemodynamics were also monitored.

Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate Versus Triamcinolone Injection For Hip Osteoarthritis

This is a single site, randomized single blinded, two arm study researching the effects of bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) versus Triamcinolone in patients with hip osteoarthritis. The aims and hypothesis are as follows: Specific Aim 1: Evaluate the change in pain and functional scores of a single bone marrow aspirate injection in comparison to triamcinolone in patients with hip osteoarthritis through validated patient reported outcomes scores at baseline to 12 months (6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months). Hypothesis: The investigators hypothesize that triamcinolone and BMAC groups will have pain reduction after each respective intervention. The changes with triamcinolone will be noticeable on the short term. The BMAC changes will take longer to have an effect but will longer duration. The investigators hypothesize that at 6 months and 1 year participants receiving BMAC will have better scores reported on the WOMAC compared to the triamcinolone injection and better than prior to injection. Specific Aim 2: Evaluate the change of bone marrow aspirate injection in comparison to triamcinolone in participant's performance on the 6 minute walk test from baseline to 12 months (6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months). Hypothesis: The investigators hypothesize that there will be higher walking distances on the 6 minute walk test in the participants receiving a BMAC injection in comparison to triamcinolone starting at the 3 months follow-up time. Specific Aim 3: Quantify and correlate cell characterization with patient reported outcomes score. Hypothesis: The investigators hypothesize that there will be better patient reported outcomes in patients who have a higher concentration of mesenchymal stem cells injected. The investigators will enroll 50 patients into each arm. Bone marrow will be aspirated then subsequently concentrated using the Emcyte PureBMC kit. The investigators will test the BMAC viability, rapid sterility, platelet concentration, volume, and total nucleated cell counts prior to injecting. The BMAC will be utilized as a hip injection into the affected hip of the patient. Patients receiving the Triamcinolone will undergo a sham bone needling to simulate the aspiration to keep patients blinded. Both groups will receive their injections under ultrasound guidance.

Z1 Hip System: Post-Market Clinical Follow Up Study

The objectives of this study are to confirm the early to mid- term safety, performance, and clinical benefits of the Z1 Femoral Hip System in hemi- and primary total hip arthroplasty. Cohort 0 The primary endpoint is defined by the survival of the implant system at 2 years, which is based on the absence of removal of the study device and will be evaluated using a one-sample proportion as well as using the Kaplan Meier method. The safety of the system will additionally be assessed by monitoring the frequency and incidence of adverse events, including relation to implant, instrumentation, and/or procedure. The secondary endpoints are defined by the functional performance and clinical benefits of the study device and are assessed by patient-reported clinical outcomes measures (PROMs)(Hip dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (HOOS JR)). Cohort 1 The primary performance endpoint is the assessment of the HOOS JR, specifically the within-patient change from baseline to 2-years post-op. The mean change from baseline will be compared against a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of 9.46 points. The key secondary safety endpoint is defined by the survival of the implant system at 2 years, which is based on the absence of removal of the study device and will be evaluated using a one-sample proportion as well as using the Kaplan Meier method. The safety of the system will additionally be assessed by monitoring the frequency and incidence of adverse events, including relation to implant, instrumentation, and/or procedure. Exploratory outcomes include: * EuroQol 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) * Patient Satisfaction * Radiographic outcomes, where available

Progressive Resistance Training Versus Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With Hip Osteoarthritis

Hip osteoarthritis is associated with joint pain, physical disability, decreased muscle strength and poor health status, and the most common cause for total hip arthroplasty. No studies have investigated the effect of total hip arthroplasty compared to non-surgical treatment in patients with end-stage hip osteoarthritis. This comparison is of upmost importance as it is unknown whether non-surgical treatment may be used as an alternate to surgery. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether total hip arthroplasty followed by standard care is superior to progressive resistance training for improving hip function and pain in patients with end-stage hip osteoarthritis. The hypothesis is that patients treated with total hip arthroplasty will improve more than patients treated with progressive resistance training.

The Ace Avanteon Study - A Randomized Controled Trial

The goal of this randomized controled trial is to compare if using of ancillary screws yields equal results as no use of ancillary screws in the ACE acetabulum cup of a total hip arthroplasty. Further, the migration of the Avanteon stem over time will be assessed. Patients included are patients with hip osteoarthritis from 65-80 years old. The purpose of this study is to compare implant migration and early fixation of a hybrid hip replacement combining the uncemented ACE acetabular component and the cemented Avanteon femoral stem, by using CT based Radiostereometric Analysis, a new innovative method for evaluating implant migration. Our study may predict the long term survival of the implants used. Participants will go through total hip arthroplasty, and be followed by CT-RSA, plain x-rays and patients reported outcome measures.

H1 Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty

This is a prospective, non-randomized, consecutive series, multicentre, observational study to evaluate the clinical outcome of ceramic-on- ceramic hip resurfacing arthroplasty using the ceramic, non-porous, non-cemented H1 Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty. It includes a safety study followed by an efficacy study. Patients will be followed up for 10-years postoperatively. The primary aim is to confirm the safety of the H1 hip resurfacing prosthesis by demonstrating non-inferiority of the H1 device in terms of survivorship. The secondary is to evaluate superiority of the ceramic-on-ceramic H1 hip resurfacing prosthesis compared to Metal-on-Metal (MoM) hip resurfacing in terms of absence of metal ion release.The primary end point is revision for any reason.

Determining the Impact of a Physiotherapist-led Primary Care Model for Hip and Knee Pain - A Cluster Trial

This is a cluster randomized controlled trial to to evaluate the individual and health system impacts of implementing a new physiotherapist-led primary care model for hip and knee pain in Canada.

Intravenous Dexmedetomidine as a Perioperative Autonomic-Immune Neuromodulator

Surgical trauma induces activation of the sympathetic nervous system and triggers a systemic inflammatory response that may adversely affect postoperative recovery. Dexmedetomidine, a highly selective α2-adrenoceptor agonist, has been proposed as a pharmacological neuromodulatory strategy capable of attenuating sympathetic activation and modulating neuroimmune interactions during the perioperative period. However, the extent to which intravenous dexmedetomidine influences perioperative inflammatory biomarkers and clinical recovery in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty under regional anesthesia remains unclear. This prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial aims to evaluate the effects of two doses of intravenous dexmedetomidine administered during spinal anesthesia combined with ultrasound-guided pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block on autonomic regulation, systemic inflammatory response, postoperative pain, opioid consumption, and quality of recovery following elective primary total hip arthroplasty.

Prospective Catalystem CT-RSA

Multi-Centre Study in patients undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty with the Smith+Nephew CATALYSTEM™ Primary Hip System. The primary objective is to establish the mean inferior stem migration (subsidence) of the CATALYSTEM™ stem using CT-RSA over the first two postoperative years.

QIPB vs SI-FICB for Postoperative Analgesia After Total Hip Arthroplasty

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) causes moderate-to-severe postoperative pain. The PROSPECT guideline recommends the supra-inguinal fascia iliaca compartment block (SI-FICB) for THA, whereas evidence for newer quadratus-lumborum-family blocks is limited. The quadro-iliac plane block (QIPB) is a recently described fascial plane block, and no study has compared QIPB with SI-FICB head-to-head in any surgical context. In this prospective, double-blind, patients undergoing elective THA who receive one of the two routinely used preoperative blocks (SI-FICB or QIPB, chosen by the attending anesthesiologist as part of routine care) are systematically observed and compared. The primary objective is to assess whether the postoperative analgesic efficacy of QIPB is non-inferior to SI-FICB, using the resting NRS pain score at 6 hours postoperatively as the primary endpoint (non-inferiority margin Δ = 1.3).

Intravenous Dexamethasone (0 vs 4 vs 8 mg) as an Adjunct to PENG Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Double-Blind Trial

his study will test whether giving dexamethasone through a vein can improve pain control after total hip replacement surgery. Dexamethasone is commonly used to reduce nausea and may also help with pain, but it is not clear which dose works best. Patients will be randomly assigned to receive either no dexamethasone, 4 mg, or 8 mg, in addition to standard anesthesia and a nerve block (PENG block). The main goal is to see how long patients go without needing additional pain medication after surgery. The study will also look at pain levels, use of opioid painkillers, nausea and vomiting, blood sugar levels, and possible side effects.

SII Levels Following PENG Block in Hip Arthroplasty

This randomized controlled trial evaluates the effect of ultrasound-guided Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) block on the Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII) in elderly patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty under spinal anesthesia. SII, calculated as platelet × neutrophil / lymphocyte count, is used as a composite marker of perioperative inflammatory and immune response. The study investigates whether PENG block attenuates the systemic inflammatory reaction to surgical trauma compared to sham block.

PENG Block vs PENG Plus Periarticular Injection vs Periarticular Injection in Older Adults

Pain after hip surgery is common in older adults and may limit early mobilization, increase the need for opioid medications, and contribute to complications such as delirium, nausea, or prolonged hospital stay. Effective postoperative pain management that preserves muscle strength and supports early rehabilitation is especially important in this population. Several analgesic strategies are currently used after hip surgery. Periarticular injection (PAI), administered by the surgeon during the procedure, is commonly used as part of standard care. The pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block is a newer ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia technique that targets the sensory nerves of the hip joint while sparing motor function. It may provide effective pain relief and facilitate early mobilization. However, it is unclear whether PENG block alone is superior to periarticular injection, and whether combining both techniques provides additional benefit. The aim of this randomized controlled clinical study is to compare three postoperative analgesic strategies in older adults undergoing hip surgery: PENG block alone, PENG block combined with periarticular injection, and periarticular injection alone. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three study groups. The primary hypothesis is that regional anesthesia with a PENG block, either alone or combined with periarticular injection, will provide superior postoperative pain control compared with periarticular injection alone. A secondary hypothesis is that the combination of PENG block and periarticular injection will offer additional analgesic benefit compared with PENG block alone. Outcomes assessed in this study will include postoperative pain intensity, need for additional pain medications, time to first mobilization, and the occurrence of adverse events relevant to older adults, such as hypotension, excessive sedation, or postoperative delirium. The results of this study may help determine the most effective and practical analgesic strategy for hip surgery in older adults and support evidence-based optimization of postoperative pain management.

Preoperative Fasting and the Gut Microbiome Before Hip Replacement

Postoperative complications occur in 5-15% of patients undergoing elective primary total hip arthroplasty (THA), including periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), thrombosis, wound healing disorders, and metabolic dysregulation. The gut microbiome and the systemic immune profile have both been implicated as modifiable contributors to perioperative complication risk. Preoperative therapeutic fasting has been shown to remodel the gut microbiome, lower proinflammatory cytokines, and improve metabolic parameters. This single-center, prospective, randomized, two-arm controlled trial at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin investigates whether a structured 20-day preoperative fasting intervention (alternating cycles of the Buchinger Fastenbox and intermittent fasting) modulates two co-primary endpoints - plasma IL-8 (a central proinflammatory marker) and gut microbial alpha-diversity (Shannon index) - compared with standard preoperative care. Secondary endpoints include further immune markers (TNFα, IL-10, T-/B-/NK-cell subsets, activation/exhaustion markers, monocyte HLA-DR), microbiome composition and function, continuous glucose-monitoring and daily metabolic measures, patient-reported outcomes (HOOS, PROMIS-33, infection self-report), and clinical outcomes (postoperative complications per EBJIS criteria, length of stay). Adults aged 18-75 undergoing elective primary THA are stratified by metabolic status (metabolically healthy vs. metabolically unhealthy according to harmonized metabolic-syndrome criteria) and randomized 1:1 to the fasting intervention versus standard care. Stool and whole-blood samples are collected at baseline (Day -21), and at Day +7 post-operatively for shotgun-metagenomic sequencing and multiparameter flow cytometry, with additional cytokine blood samples at Day -1 and 6 h / 24 h / 72 h post-operatively. Continuous glucose monitoring is performed in all participants from Day -21 until surgery. Planned enrollment is 130 participants.

Effectiveness of a Prehabilitation Program for Hip or Knee Arthroplasty Surgery.

We live in an increasingly aging society in which the incidence of osteoarticular diseases increases, among which osteoarthritis (OA) stands out. OA is a degenerative disorder of the different components of the joint leading to a progressive destruction of the same. The hip and knee being the most affected joints, OA presents multiple symptoms such as pain, stiffness and functional limitation, also causing psychological disorders such as anxiety, depression, quality of sleep and poor perception of quality of life. Conventional treatment is aimed at alleviating symptoms, but when conservative therapies fail in the more advanced stages of the disease, total joint replacement surgery or arthroplasty is the therapeutic option of choice. Strength physical exercise (PE) and aerobic training have been shown to be effective in OA, obtaining positive effects on the symptoms and on variables that deteriorate this disease. The concept of pre-habilitation or preoperative rehabilitation has been shown through other studies in different pathologies (cardiopulmonary and musculoskeletal) to have positive effects at a clinical and functional level, however, the planning of a pre-habilitation protocol in hip or knee arthroplasty is still controversial. The purpose of this study is to determine the effect that a prehabilitation program will produce and its possible usefulness in those subjects who are waiting for a hip or knee arthroplasty. It is expected to find favorable results that support this therapy when it comes to reducing postoperative recovery times, functional capacity and other psychological variables of interest. This powerful tool could represent a non-pharmacological and non-invasive therapy, as well as being useful and economical in the management of patients with OA in advanced stages.

Evaluating XPERIENCE™ Advanced Surgical Irrigation

A prospective, multi-center, double-arm, parallel, interventional, randomized, controlled clinical trial to assess the rate of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA), total hip arthroplasty (THA) or hip resurfacing (HR) with XPERIENCE™ (XP) Advanced Surgical Irrigation versus dilute Betadine (DB).

Three Variants of the PENG Block With and Without Perineural Adjuvants in Older Adults

This study will compare three versions of the Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) block in adults aged 65 years and older who are undergoing hip surgery. The PENG block is a regional anesthesia technique used to reduce pain around the hip joint and may improve early recovery after surgery. All patients in the study will receive the PENG block using 20 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine. They will then be randomly assigned to one of three groups: Group 1: PENG block using ropivacaine only (no additional medications). Group 2: PENG block using ropivacaine with 4 mg of dexamethasone injected near the nerves. Group 3: PENG block using ropivacaine with 25 micrograms of dexmedetomidine injected near the nerves. Dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine are medications that may increase the duration and quality of regional anesthesia. It is not known whether adding one of these medications provides longer-lasting or better pain relief compared to using ropivacaine alone. The main purpose of this study is to determine whether the addition of dexamethasone or dexmedetomidine improves the effectiveness of the PENG block in relieving pain after hip surgery. The study will evaluate pain levels, opioid consumption, time to first rescue pain medication, need for additional analgesia, and recovery outcomes. Safety, side effects, and any block-related complications will also be monitored. The investigators hypothesize that adding either perineural dexamethasone or dexmedetomidine will result in longer and more effective pain relief compared with the standard PENG block without an adjuvant. This research may help identify the most effective form of the PENG block for older adults undergoing hip surgery and contribute to improved pain management, reduced opioid use, and better postoperative recovery.

PENG Block and Delirium After Hip Arthroplasty

Postoperative delirium is a common and serious complication in older adults undergoing total hip arthroplasty, associated with prolonged hospitalization, increased morbidity, delayed rehabilitation, and long-term cognitive decline. Modifiable perioperative risk factors include uncontrolled postoperative pain, opioid consumption, impaired early mobilization, and systemic inflammatory response. The Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) block is a regional anesthesia technique targeting the sensory innervation of the anterior hip capsule and may provide effective analgesia while preserving motor function. Improved pain control and opioid reduction may decrease the incidence of postoperative delirium. This prospective, randomized, parallel-group controlled trial aims to evaluate whether the addition of ultrasound-guided PENG block to spinal anesthesia reduces the incidence of postoperative delirium within 72 hours after primary total hip arthroplasty in patients aged 65 years or older. Delirium will be assessed using the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) by blinded outcome assessors. Secondary outcomes include postoperative opioid consumption, pain intensity (NRS), time to first rescue opioid, postoperative nausea and vomiting, time to mobilization, block-related adverse events, and perioperative inflammatory indices (neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio). The study will enroll 144 patients randomized 1:1 to spinal anesthesia alone or spinal anesthesia plus PENG block.

PENG Block Variants With Dexamethasone and Dexmedetomidine in Older Adults

This study will compare three different versions of the Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) block in adults aged 65 years and older who are undergoing surgery for hip conditions. The PENG block is a regional anesthesia technique that can reduce pain after surgery and decrease the need for strong opioid pain medications. All patients in the study will receive the PENG block with 20 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine, but they will be divided into three groups based on the additional medications used: Group 1: PENG block with ropivacaine plus 4 mg of dexamethasone given intravenously. Group 2: PENG block with ropivacaine plus 25 micrograms of dexmedetomidine given near the nerves and 4 mg of dexamethasone given intravenously. Group 3: PENG block with ropivacaine plus 25 micrograms of dexmedetomidine and 4 mg of dexamethasone given near the nerves. Both dexmedetomidine and dexamethasone are medications that may improve the strength and duration of nerve blocks. The main goal of this study is to determine which combination provides the best pain control after hip surgery, reduces the need for opioid medications, and improves patient comfort and recovery. We also aim to evaluate the safety and side-effects of each technique. We hypothesize that adding both dexmedetomidine and dexamethasone near the nerves will provide the longest and most effective pain relief when compared to intravenous administration alone. This trial may help identify the most effective PENG block formula for older adults undergoing hip surgery and could improve pain management, decrease complications related to opioids, and support faster recovery.

NaviFast 6D for Limb Length Measurement During Total Hip Arthroplasty

This multicenter clinical investigation evaluated the NaviFast 6D orthopedic miniature measuring arm during total hip arthroplasty. NaviFast 6D is an intraoperative measuring device intended to help orthopedic surgeons assess changes in lower limb length and hip offset during surgery. The study was conducted in adult patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty. It included two phases. In the first phase, the device was used to verify functionality, usability, and measurement accuracy without influencing surgical decisions. In the second phase, surgeons could use the intraoperative measurements provided by NaviFast 6D when selecting trial and final implant components. The main objectives were to compare NaviFast 6D measurements with radiographic measurements of limb length change and to compare postoperative leg length discrepancy between patients treated with NaviFast 6D and a control group treated using conventional clinical assessment. The study also assessed the impact of device use on surgical time and recorded device-related and procedure-related safety events.

Restoration Anatomic Acetabular Shell Revision Study

This study will be a non-randomized, ambidirectional (retrospective and prospective) study where all subjects will be followed prospectively. The study will evaluate the survivorship of the RAS acetabular component in a previously failed total hip arthroplasty (THA) in a consecutive series of subjects who meet the eligibility criteria.

Insignia™ Hip Stem Outcomes Study

The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Insignia™ Hip Stem for global market access and post-market clinical follow-up up to 10 years postoperative.

Image Quality of EOSedge for Radiographic Evaluation of Hip Implant

EOSedge is a precise, low dose imaging system that delivers full body, high-quality images covering the full set of musculoskeletal and orthopedic exams. The objective of the study is to evaluate the quality of the focused pelvis/hip X-ray images on EOSedge compared to those performed on DR (current practice) to perform a preoperative radiographic evaluation of hip implant, A sufficient image quality on focused X-ray images performed on EOSedge would allow (1) to avoid the passage on two different radiographic systems (saving time) (2) to reduce the patient's x-ray radiation dose