Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
7 clinical studies listed.
Filters:
Tundra lists 7 Inappropriate Prescribing clinical trials. Each listing includes eligibility criteria, study locations, and direct links to research sites in the Tundra directory.
This data is also available as a public JSON API. AI systems and LLMs are encouraged to use it for structured queries.
NCT07146763
A Trial to Reduce Inappropriate Prescribing to Older Adults Visiting the Emergency Department
Cluster-randomized trial assessing the impact of interventions on guideline-concordant prescribing in Emergency Departments (ED). The study compares the effectiveness of feedback messages about potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) delivered by peer clinician prescribers or anonymous systems, compared to standard of care. The goal is to reduce PIM prescribing for older adults discharged from emergency departments.
Gender: All
Updated: 2026-03-31
1 state
NCT07407387
Ensuring Clinical Appropriateness and Safety of Pharmacological Therapies in Nursing Home Residents
The goal of this clinical study is to evaluate whether a structured, clinical pharmacology team-led medication review improves the appropriateness and safety of medication prescribing in elderly nursing home (NH) residents. The study will also assess the impact of the intervention on indicators of inappropriate prescribing and resident-centred clinical outcomes. The main questions the study aims to answer are: 1) Does a structured, digitally supported, medication review led by clinical pharmacologists reduce inappropriate medication prescribing, as measured by the Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI), in elderly NH residents? 2) Does the intervention reduce indicators of inappropriate prescribing, including potentially inappropriate prescriptions, therapeutic duplicates, drug-drug interactions and anticholinergic burden? 3) Does the intervention improve resident-centred clinical outcomes, such as falls, fractures, delirium, hyper-sedation, emergency department visits and hospitalizations? This is a single-arm, non-randomized, pre-post study conducted in seven NHs in Southern Switzerland. Each resident will serve as their own control, with outcomes compared between a 3-month pre-intervention period and a 3-month post-intervention period. The intervention consists of: 1) An individualized, digitally supported, medication review conducted by the team of clinical pharmacologists; 2) Face-to-face feedback to NH healthcare professionals responsible for managing residents' medications; 3) Tailored educational sessions addressing common prescribing issues identified during the medication review. Participants will: be aged 65 years or older and reside in participating NHs; have their routinely collected clinical and medication data assessed during a 3-month pre-intervention period; receive the intervention integrated into routine care, with any medication changes implemented by treating clinicians. The study is low-risk, non-invasive, and embedded in routine NH care. The results will provide evidence on the clinical effectiveness of integrating clinical pharmacology expertise into inter-professional medication management in Swiss NHs.
Gender: All
Ages: 65 Years - Any
Updated: 2026-02-27
NCT06129474
Deprescribing Inappropriate Proton Pump Inhibitors
The DROPIT Trial is an interventional, open-labelled, cluster-randomized controlled trial conducted in the Swiss primary care setting. It aims to evaluate an intervention to guide the deprescribing of inappropriate proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs). Therefore, the trial investigates whether the study intervention leads to the deprescribing of inappropriate PPI prescription while ensuring noninferiority safety, in comparison to usual care. Additionally, the trail aims to investigate the intervention's impact on other clinical aspects, as well as addressing features of the implementation of the intervention and its cost-effectiveness.
Gender: All
Ages: 18 Years - Any
Updated: 2026-02-17
NCT07336550
Reduction of Low-value Prescribing Through Audit and Feedback
The objective is to estimate the effect attributable to a primary care pharmacist-led audit and feedback (AF) strategy compared to the currently used AF strategy as a management tool to evaluate healthcare performance focusing on processes and outcomes, for reducing the rate of patients over 65 years of age with potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) of benzodiazepines, proton pump inhibitors and opioids. A closed-cohort stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial will be conducted in nine PC centres from Barakaldo-Sestao Integrated Health Organization, Basque Health Service (Osakidetza). All health centre clusters will start under the control condition, and at each step, some three centres will be randomly assigned to crossover to the intervention, under which they will be exposed to an additional component of AF, namely, primary care pharmacist-led facilitation. Mixed-methods analysis will be performed, gathering quantitative data to assess the results of the implementations at health centre and clinician levels, and qualitative data to assess the feasibility and perceived impact of the de-implementation strategies from the clinicians' perspective, and explore the experience and satisfaction of patients regarding the healthcare received. This study will provide useful knowledge on the effect attributable to a more intensive AF strategy (facilitated AF) compared to standard procedures of AF reports, and of the characteristics of AF that are most effective.
Gender: All
Ages: 65 Years - Any
Updated: 2026-01-13
1 state
NCT05875623
Impact of Medications Review on Potentially Inappropriate Medications and Clinical Outcomes Among Hospitalized Older Adults
The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to assess the effectiveness of a pharmacist-led medication review using the locally developed Malaysian Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing Screening tool in Older Adults (MALPIP), an explicit criteria in hospitalized older adults. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. The effectiveness of the intervention in reducing the number of PIMs and chronic medications after discharge 2. The impact of the intervention on quality of life, falls events, emergency department visits, readmissions and survivals Researchers will compare the control group to see if there is corresponding changes to the outcomes specified above.
Gender: All
Ages: 60 Years - Any
Updated: 2025-05-08
1 state
NCT06640023
The Study in Outpatient Medicine Using Nudges to Improve Sleep
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if electronic health record (EHR) nudges (changes to the EHR that do not restrict freedom of choice or alter incentives) can reduce Z-drug prescribing in primary care clinics for patients with insomnia. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Can Z-drug prescribing be reduced by setting the dispense quantity default of new Z-drug orders in the EHR to 10 pills with 0 refills? 2. Can Z-drug prescribing be reduced by an EHR alert that suggests clinicians remove a Z-drug and/or add an evidence-based behavioral treatment for insomnia, followed by a request to justify their reasoning if the suggestion is not followed? 3. Does combining these two nudges reduce Z-drug prescribing? Researchers will compare each nudge individually and in combination to an guideline education control group to see if each nudge (separately and in combination) can reduce Z-drug prescribing. Clinician-participants will: 1. Complete an introductory educational module about treating insomnia and relevant EHR changes. 2. Complete their routine patient visits. 3. Either experience EHR changes when prescribing Z-drugs, including a Z-drug dispense quantity default of 10 pills for new orders, a prompt to remove or justify Z-drug orders, both, or neither.
Gender: All
Ages: 18 Years - Any
Updated: 2025-04-27
1 state
NCT03689049
SPIDER: A Research & QI Collaboration Supporting Practices in Improving Care for Complex Elderly Patients
Elders living with multiple chronic conditions often take many drugs (polypharmacy); some of the drugs may not benefit them or may be harmful. The Canadian Institute for Health Information has reported that about one-quarter of Canadian seniors are prescribed ten or more different drugs each year. Polypharmacy can result in poorer health, reduced quality of life and high healthcare costs. Choosing Wisely Canada and the Canadian Deprescribing Network have suggested wiser uses for the following four Potentially Inappropriate Prescriptions (PIPs): drugs that reduce stomach acid; reduce anxiety and induce sleep; treat agitation; and treat type 2 diabetes but have a high risk of low blood sugar. To improve care for elderly patients living with polypharmacy, we propose SPIDER: a Structured Process Informed by Data, Evidence and Research. Using quality improvement (QI) and supported by Electronic Medical Record (EMR) data, SPIDER will invite family doctors, nurses, pharmacists and front desk staff to participate in Learning Collaboratives and learn from each other. The practice teams will work with a QI Coach to identify areas to improve, develop strategies and implement changes tailored to the local practice context. The objective of this study is to determine whether SPIDER will reduce PIPs for patients 65 years or older who are on ten or more different drugs. The study will also explore patient experience and provider satisfaction with SPIDER and assess the cost of running SPIDER. The study will first be tested for feasibility in Toronto, Edmonton and Montreal. Findings will then guide a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) in Calgary, Winnipeg, Ottawa, Montreal and Halifax where practices enrolled in the SPIDER intervention will be compared with those in usual care.
Gender: All
Ages: 65 Years - Any
Updated: 2025-03-25
7 states