Tundra Space

Tundra Space

Clinical Research Directory

Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.

3 clinical studies listed.

Filters:

Intrabony Defect

Tundra lists 3 Intrabony Defect clinical trials. Each listing includes eligibility criteria, study locations, and direct links to research sites in the Tundra directory.

This data is also available as a public JSON API. AI systems and LLMs are encouraged to use it for structured queries.

RECRUITING

NCT07339605

Flapless Periodontal Regeneration Using Hyaluronic Acid Versus Enamel Matrix Derivative

The goal of this clinical trial is to radiographically assess the effectiveness of minimally invasive non-surgical technique (MINST) combined with local administration of sodium hypochlorite gel (Perisolv®) and 1.6% cross-linked hyaluronic acid (HA, Hyadent BG®) compared to a neutral formulation of EDTA (Prefgel®) and enamel matrix derivative (EMD, Emdogain® FL) in periodontal regeneration. The main questions it aims to answer are: * ¿Does the combination of MINST with the local administration of sodium hypochlorite gel and 1.6% cross-linked hyaluronic acid show a potential for periodontal regeneration similar to evaluating clinical and radiographic variables compared to a neutral formulation of EDTA and enamel matrix derivative? * ¿What is the patient perception and satisfaction with the received treatment? Researchers will compare A (MINST with Perisolv® + Hyadent BG®), B (MINST with PrefGel® + Emdogain® FL) and C(MINST without any bioactive product). The sample will be distributed according to the following treatments: * Experimental group: Scaling and root planing (SRP), MINST with Perisolv® + Hyadent BG®. * Active comparator group: SRP, MINST with PrefGel® + Emdogain® FL. * Control group: SRP, MINST without any bioactive product. Patients will be screened by a first visit in which they will be assigned their periodontal status. If they meet the eligibility criteria, they will be treated according to the EFP clinical guideline for periodontitis treatment: step I and step II.If the periodontal defect persists at the 12-week re-evaluation, patients will be randomised to treatment A, B or C. After the intervention, all participants will be checked weekly for the first 6 weeks to remove accumulated plaque, and every 3 months for 1 year. Periodontal parameters will be re-evaluated 6 and 12 months after periodontal regenerative intervention.

Gender: All

Ages: 18 Years - Any

Updated: 2026-01-14

1 state

Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal / Methods
Dental Enamel Proteins* / Therapeutic Use
Alveolar Bone Loss* / Therapy
+4
ACTIVE NOT RECRUITING

NCT07261878

Treatment of Intrabony Defect in Patient With Periodontitis Stage III by Using I-PRF and Xenograft

Evaluate of the injectable platelet rich fibrin (I-PRF) with xenograft in Intrabony defects of Periodontitis patient stage III versus Xenograft alone.

Gender: All

Ages: 30 Years - 55 Years

Updated: 2025-12-03

1 state

Intrabony Defect
Intrabony Defects in Chronic Periodontitis
NOT YET RECRUITING

NCT06936605

RGD With Minimally Invasive Non-Surgical Technique in Treatment of Periodontal Intrabony Defect

Periodontal regeneration is a complex process that involves coordinated activities and interactions of many cell types, extracellular matrix, cytokines, and specific growth factors to restore tissue integrity. The most important challenge facing periodontal regeneration is cellular insufficiency. Periodontal defects usually have a limited regenerative capacity due to their bounded surface area which is supposed to provide the wound area with a limited number of viable cells and a limited amount of biologic mediators. Cell recruitment and adhesion into the defect area are essential for cells to survive and secrete collagen. Apoptosis is initiated when failure in adhesion in many different cell types occurs. Some periodontal treatment options failed in the reconstruction of the defect due to failure in wound stabilization and subsequent cell adhesion. Many treatment options have been developed to enhance defect stability and cellular recruitment including the use of GTM and different biologics. However, the treatment outcomes vary considerably depending on the level of the defect cellularity and the degree of cell recruitment into the defect area. For maximum outcomes, enhanced stability, vascularity, and biologics-sustained delivery were suggested. The minimally invasive surgical technique (MIST) suggested by Cortellini et al. offers a suitable level of tissue preservation that could help in defect stability and cellular adhesion. It was suggested to promote flap stability, maintain space, and maintain a greater amount of blood supply at the alveolar crest and papillary levels.

Gender: All

Ages: 18 Years - 55 Years

Updated: 2025-04-20

Intrabony Defect
Periodontal Diseases
Alveolar Bone Loss