Clinical Research Directory

Optimal Strategy to Correct Stent underexpAnsion in Resistant Lesions

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for in-stent restenosis (ISR) accounts for 5-10% of PCI. ISR may be linked to mechanical complications mainly under-expansion (UE), neointimal hyperplasia and/or neoatherosclerosis. International guidelines recommends non-compliant and very-high-pressure balloons, which lead to sub-optimal angiographic and clinical results. Recently, observational studies have suggested the feasibility and safety of intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) in UE treatment. There are no prospective randomised controlled studies comparing intravascular lithotripsy with balloons in ISR with UE.

Orbital Atherectomy vs Intravascular Lithotripsy for the Treatment of Calcified Coronary Nodules (ORBIT-SHOCK).

The ORBIT-SHOCK pilot study is a multicenter, prospective, randomized clinical trial initiated by investigators. It will include patients diagnosed with atherosclerotic coronary artery disease presenting calcified nodules (CN), identified by optical coherence tomography (OCT), causing significant angiographic stenosis and eligible for revascularization through percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to undergo lesion preparation with either orbital atherectomy (OA) or intravascular lithotripsy (IVL). The ORBIT-SHOCK pilot study is a multicenter, prospective, randomized clinical trial initiated by investigators. It will include patients diagnosed with atherosclerotic coronary artery disease presenting calcified nodules (CN), identified by optical coherence tomography (OCT), causing significant angiographic stenosis and eligible for revascularization through percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to undergo lesion preparation with either orbital atherectomy (OA) or intravascular lithotripsy (IVL). The aim of this pilot trial is to compare PCI outcomes and the incidence of adverse events between both techniques.

Clinical Trial on the Treatment of Stent Underexpansion Caused by Calcification Using Intravascular Lithotripsy

Our aim is to investigate the efficacy and safety of intravascular lithotripsy(IVL) in the treatment of stent underexpansion caused by calcification through a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial. Patients with inadequate stent expansion due to calcification detected by intravascular ultrasound(IVUS) were randomly divided into two groups. The experimental group received IVL in addition to high-pressure balloon post-dilation, while the control group only received high-pressure balloon post-dilation. Follow up for 1 year is conducted to determine the safety and efficacy of IVL application based on the primary efficacy endpoint, key secondary efficacy endpoint, other secondary efficacy endpoint, and safety endpoint.